Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Winginx VS SimpleHTTPServer

Compare Winginx VS SimpleHTTPServer and see what are their differences

Winginx logo Winginx

Download Winginx · Docs · FAQ · Support · JA · RU · EN · Donate now. Discover a handy tool for web development! Enjoy; PHP 7. 1 (+ 5. 6); MySQL 5.

SimpleHTTPServer logo SimpleHTTPServer

Serve a single directory over HTTP
  • Winginx Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-19
  • SimpleHTTPServer Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-22

Winginx features and specs

  • Comprehensive Integration
    Winginx offers an easy installation of multiple components, including Nginx, MySQL, MongoDB, Node.js, Redis, and PHP, in a single package which ensures seamless integration and saves time for the user.
  • User-friendly Interface
    The interface of Winginx is designed to be intuitive, making it easy for developers, especially beginners, to manage their local development environment without dealing with complex configuration processes.
  • Portable Option
    Winginx offers a portable version, which provides flexibility for developers to carry their working environment on a USB drive and deploy it on different systems without a full installation.
  • Automatic Updates
    Winginx automatically updates its components, ensuring the user always has the latest versions and security patches without manual intervention.

Possible disadvantages of Winginx

  • Windows Only
    Winginx is designed for the Windows operating system, which limits its accessibility and usability for developers using macOS or Linux systems.
  • Limited Community Support
    As Winginx is not as widely used as some other development environments, the community support and available online resources are limited, potentially making troubleshooting more challenging.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running all included components simultaneously in Winginx can be resource-intensive, which might slow down other applications or the operating system itself, particularly on less powerful machines.
  • Lack of Customization
    Winginx's packaged nature might limit users looking for customized configurations or integrating additional components not included by default with Winginx.

SimpleHTTPServer features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    SimpleHTTPServer is extremely easy to use, requiring just a single command to spin up a basic web server, making it ideal for quick testing and development purposes.
  • No Installation Required
    As a standard module in Python 2.7, SimpleHTTPServer does not require any additional installation processes, reducing setup time for developers.
  • Platform Independent
    Being part of Python's standard library, it is platform-independent and can run on any system that supports Python.

Possible disadvantages of SimpleHTTPServer

  • Security
    SimpleHTTPServer lacks security features like HTTPS, authentication mechanisms, and protection against vulnerabilities, which makes it unsuitable for production environments.
  • Limited Functionality
    Designed for serving static files, SimpleHTTPServer lacks advanced functionalities like CGI scripting or integration with databases needed for dynamic content serving.
  • Obsolete
    Being a part of Python 2.7 which is no longer maintained, SimpleHTTPServer is obsolete, and users are encouraged to use Python 3, specifically the http.server module for better functionality and support.
  • Single Threaded
    By default, SimpleHTTPServer handles requests sequentially in a single-threaded manner, which can result in performance bottlenecks when handling multiple requests simultaneously.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Winginx and SimpleHTTPServer)
Web Servers
83 83%
17% 17
Web And Application Servers
Development Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Application Server
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Winginx and SimpleHTTPServer. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Winginx and SimpleHTTPServer

Winginx Reviews

9 Best XAMPP Alternatives Cross Platform Web Server
With the Winginx website testing and launching the website to the main server becomes very easy. The elements of the stack are easy to update. With multiple versions of the same app being supported, you can switch between the versions according to your convenience. Tracking server logs and debugging errors is also incredibly easy with winging.
5 best XAMPP alternatives for local website hosting
It has a to-do system that allows users to manage multiple projects at once and offers a free online store where you can get website templates if you get stuck. Winginx also allows you to monitor server logs and debug applications on the fly. In addition, it has database management tools including phpMyAdmin, Mongo Console Client and RockMongo, etc.
Source: tipsmake.com

SimpleHTTPServer Reviews

We have no reviews of SimpleHTTPServer yet.
Be the first one to post

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Winginx and SimpleHTTPServer, you can also consider the following products

WnMp - Wnmp (pronounced "W-n-m-p") is an open source development environment consisting of a control panel, Nginx, MariaDB, and PHP for Windows. Wnmp was created with a goal to be as simple as possible, while having a powerful Graphical User Interface.

lighttpd - A secure, fast, compliant, and very flexible web-server that has been optimized for high-performance environments

WinNMP - Nginx MariaDB Redis Php development stack for Windows, with Composer, Adminer, LetsEncrypt...

nginx - A high performance free open source web server powering busiest sites on the Internet.

WPN-XM - WPN-XM - is a free and open-source web server solution stack for professional PHP development on...

Apache HTTP Server - Apache httpd has been the most popular web server on the Internet since April 1996