
Virtual Windows 98
Computer Museum
Mac Plus with MacPaint
Windows 96
Win7 Simu
macintosh.js
98.css
Windows 95 in Electron. Runs on macOS, Linux, and Windows.

Decode and verify SSL/TLS certificates online. Extract X.509 details including issuer, validity, SAN, and fingerprint. Fast, secure, and browser-based.

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Windows95 should be more popular than Cert Decoder. It has been mentioned 6 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | github.com | certdecoder.com |
| Pricing | — | |
| Platforms | — | |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of Windows95 yet.
Cert Decoder is a free online tool that helps you decode X.509 SSL/TLS certificates in PEM format. It instantly shows important information like the issuer, expiry date, SAN entries, and fingerprint. All data is processed locally in your browser, so nothing is ever sent or stored elsewhere.
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


No analysis of Windows95 yet.
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing Windows95 and Cert Decoder.
Cert Decoder's answer:
I built certdecoder.com over the weekend for my own needs. Sometimes in my work, I need to verify and check certificate details.
Cert Decoder's answer:
certdecoder.com was built using just JavaScript and HTML—simple, fast, and with all processing happening locally in your browser, so no certificate data is sent to any server
Cert Decoder's answer:
certdecoder.com is primarily built for developers, sysadmins, cybersecurity enthusiasts, and DevOps engineers.
Cert Decoder's answer:
Simple, fast, and reliable. Some similar tools can’t even decode basic certificates. I rigorously tested my tool with many real-world certificates and covered several edge cases where competitors fall short.
Cert Decoder's answer:
certdecoder.com is primarily built for developers, sysadmins, cybersecurity enthusiasts, and DevOps engineers.
Share your experience with using Windows95 and Cert Decoder. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Windows 95 can be run inside of an app. Source: about 3 years ago
I use a program called Revo Uninstaller found here. There is a paid and free version, I use the free version and it works fine. When you select a program to uninstall through Revo, it will launch the program's uninstaller first, then it... Source: over 3 years ago
If the problem to solve is piping an emacs buffer to a Windows 95 text mode binary and replace the buffer with the text output, the solution could be 1. Run Windows 95 in an emulator, maybe a webassembly one. 2. Generate the mouse clicks... - Source: Hacker News / almost 4 years ago
Why? Because I built certdecoder.com and couldn’t find a decent place to submit it. So I said screw it — I’ll build my own. With blackjack and hookers. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
When comparing Windows95 and Cert Decoder, you can also consider the following products.
Use Windows 98 in your browser
Compare Virtual Windows 98 to Windows95 or Cert Decoder:

A blast from the Mac's past, running in your browser.
Compare Mac Plus with MacPaint to Windows95 or Cert Decoder:

Windows 96 is a recreation of Windows 98 in the browser.
Compare Windows 96 to Windows95 or Cert Decoder:

Experience the nostalgic Windows 7 right from your fingertips
Compare Win7 Simu to Windows95 or Cert Decoder:

A 1991 Macintosh in an app - for Windows, Linux, and macOS
Compare macintosh.js to Windows95 or Cert Decoder: