Windows95
Mac Plus with MacPaint
98.css
Ruffle
The Restart Page
Medium
Hacker News Search
Use Windows 98 in your browser

Decode and verify SSL/TLS certificates online. Extract X.509 details including issuer, validity, SAN, and fingerprint. Fast, secure, and browser-based.

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Virtual Windows 98 seems to be a lot more popular than Cert Decoder. While we know about 76 links to Virtual Windows 98, we've tracked only 1 mention of Cert Decoder.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
VW
Virtual Windows 98
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | copy.sh | certdecoder.com |
| Pricing | ||
| Platforms | — | |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

No description of Virtual Windows 98 yet.
Cert Decoder is a free online tool that helps you decode X.509 SSL/TLS certificates in PEM format. It instantly shows important information like the issuer, expiry date, SAN entries, and fingerprint. All data is processed locally in your browser, so nothing is ever sent or stored elsewhere.
What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Possible disadvantages
Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

As answered by people managing Virtual Windows 98 and Cert Decoder.
Cert Decoder's answer:
I built certdecoder.com over the weekend for my own needs. Sometimes in my work, I need to verify and check certificate details.
Cert Decoder's answer:
certdecoder.com was built using just JavaScript and HTML—simple, fast, and with all processing happening locally in your browser, so no certificate data is sent to any server
Cert Decoder's answer:
certdecoder.com is primarily built for developers, sysadmins, cybersecurity enthusiasts, and DevOps engineers.
Cert Decoder's answer:
Simple, fast, and reliable. Some similar tools can’t even decode basic certificates. I rigorously tested my tool with many real-world certificates and covered several edge cases where competitors fall short.
Cert Decoder's answer:
certdecoder.com is primarily built for developers, sysadmins, cybersecurity enthusiasts, and DevOps engineers.
Share your experience with using Virtual Windows 98 and Cert Decoder. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Some of these are runnable in the browser, for example here: https://copy.sh/v86/. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
Here! a way to play this on copy.sh so that people can play this in their browser: https://copy.sh/v86/?profile=haiku. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
I don't think v86 [1] is based on qemu, but it's a javascript (well javascript + rust->wasm) virtual PC. Not my project, it's super lovely for hobby os demos though. (And they've taken a couple of my PRs!) [1] https://copy.sh/v86/... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
Why? Because I built certdecoder.com and couldn’t find a decent place to submit it. So I said screw it — I’ll build my own. With blackjack and hookers. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
When comparing Virtual Windows 98 and Cert Decoder, you can also consider the following products.

Windows 95 in Electron. Runs on macOS, Linux, and Windows.
Compare Windows95 to Virtual Windows 98 or Cert Decoder:

A blast from the Mac's past, running in your browser.
Compare Mac Plus with MacPaint to Virtual Windows 98 or Cert Decoder:

A design system for building faithful recreations of old UIs
Compare 98.css to Virtual Windows 98 or Cert Decoder:


Geek nostalgia at its best
Compare The Restart Page to Virtual Windows 98 or Cert Decoder:

Welcome to Medium, a place to read, write, and interact with the stories that matter most to you.
Compare Medium to Virtual Windows 98 or Cert Decoder: