Wikipedia
Fandom
Encyclopรฆdia Britannica
Miraheze
Editthis
Everipedia
WikiSpooks.com
Oppia
ForthWrite
ReclaimAI
Superhuman
Shortwave
Serif AI
Gemini
Gmail
LIAM
ForthWrite is an AI email writing assistant for Gmail and Outlook that learns your writing style from your real sent mail. The more you use it, the more it sounds like you. Get smart drafts in seconds, auto-draft replies before you open your inbox, and maintain your personal voice at scale. Free to start, no credit card required. Works inside Gmail and Outlook on the web.
How it works
ForthWrite captures your tone, sentence rhythm, and sign-offs from your actual sent emails, then uses that profile to generate drafts that match how you write, not a generic AI voice. Every draft you edit or send improves the model over time.
Key features
Who uses it
Professionals who send high volumes of relationship-critical email: lawyers, financial advisors, recruiters, account executives, founders, and anyone who wants their inbox handled without sounding like a chatbot wrote it.
Pricing
Free tier includes 10 drafts per week with no credit card required. Paid plans start at $12/month and include unlimited drafts, custom persona prompts, and auto-draft.
Wikipedia ForthWriteNo ForthWrite videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
ForthWrite's answer:
Next.js, React, Supabase, Anthropic Claude, OpenAI, Stripe, Vercel, Chrome Extensions API
ForthWrite's answer:
ForthWrite learns your writing style from your actual sent mail, not a generic prompt. Every draft sounds like you wrote it because it was trained on how you actually write. It also auto-drafts replies before you open your inbox, so your email is partially handled before your day starts.
ForthWrite's answer:
Most AI email tools give you a blank box and a "write for me" button. ForthWrite builds a voice profile from your sent history and gets more accurate with every draft you edit or send. Unlike ChatGPT or Gemini, it works natively inside Gmail and Outlook with no copy-paste. Unlike Lavender, it writes the draft, not just scores it.
ForthWrite's answer:
Professionals who send high volumes of relationship-critical email and cannot afford to sound generic: lawyers, financial advisors, recruiters, account executives, consultants, and founders managing their own inbox.
ForthWrite's answer:
Built out of frustration with AI writing tools that produce text that sounds nothing like the person sending it, and as a way to handle large amounts of daily email. The core insight was that your sent mail is the best training data you already have, and no tool was using it.
I built ForthWrite because I kept sending emails that sounded like they came from the same generic AI as everyone else. After launching it, I still use it for my own inbox every day, which is about the most honest endorsement I can give.
The Chrome extension lives inside Gmail and Outlook on the web. Open a thread, hit Alt+Shift+D, and a draft comes back in your voice, not a template. The free tier is real: 10 drafts per week, no API key, no credit card. Voice matching is included on free, because that is the point.
What keeps it useful compared to Gemini or a chat tab: it learns from what you actually send. Every edit you make before hitting send becomes a signal. Over time the drafts drift closer to how you really write, and the dashboard shows the improvement curve so you can see it happening.
The web compose surface lets you draft from forthwrite.ai without installing anything, useful for people who want to try before committing to the extension.
Standard adds recipient-aware and intent-aware drafting plus AI coaching. Pro adds auto-draft (replies waiting when you open Gmail), batch replies, and Prompt Lab for version-controlling your prompts. Teams adds a shared persona and seat-level analytics.
ForthWrite is not for everyone. If you just need quick replies and tone does not matter, Gemini is free and already in your inbox. ForthWrite is for people where tone does matter: client communication, relationship-driven threads, external correspondence where sounding off costs something real.
Disclosure: I am the founder and use it daily. Happy to answer questions in the comments.
Based on our record, Wikipedia seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 131 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
# Laravel's homepage through the years Wayback-video https://laravel.com --scroll --interval year --crossfade 0.4 # Wikipedia, month by month, over its first decade Wayback-video https://wikipedia.org --scroll --interval month --from 2001 --to 2010 # Fast mode: Wayback's pre-captured PNGs only, no browser needed Wayback-video https://mozilla.org --wayback-screenshot year --scroll. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
From DrissionPage import ChromiumPage # Create browser instance Page = ChromiumPage() # Navigate to URL Page.get('https://wikipedia.org') # Find and interact with elements Page('#search-input').input('Hello World') Page('#submit-btn').click(). - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
From helium import * # Start browser and navigate Start_chrome("https://wikipedia.org") # Type into the search box Write("Python programming", into=S("input[name='search']")) # Click the search button Click(Button("Search")) # Check if text exists If Text("Python").exists(): print("Found Python article!") # Close browser Kill_browser(). - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
> that is like skim reading or basic introductions No? How do you learn stuff you don't know? Are you really telling me you enroll in a graduate course or buy a textbook for everyone one? Like, can you give an example of a "deep dive" research project of yours that does not begin with an encyclopedia-style treatment? And then, maybe, check the Wikipedia page to see if it's actually worse than whatever... - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
Does anyone have any suggestions for fixing an issue I've been having with the Wikiwand extension? I haven't been able to get the link previews working the way they used to, and it's super frustrating and annoying when it works with the regular wikipedia.org page just fine. I'm unaware of any other extensions that I have that would be interacting (and I've tried on MS Edge with the same issue). Example pics... Source: over 2 years ago
Fandom - The entertainment site where fans come first.
ReclaimAI - Helps users prioritize their work and personal calendars
Encyclopรฆdia Britannica - Explore the fact-checked online encyclopedia from Encyclopaedia Britannica with hundreds of thousands of objective articles, biographies, videos, and images from experts.
Superhuman - Superhuman is an email management tool.
Miraheze - Miraheze is a wiki farm (hosts wikis) for free and with no ads, it also provides custom domains...
Shortwave - Email smarter & faster with a reinvented experience for your Gmail