Table of contents
Comprehensive Coverage
Wikipedia provides information on an enormous range of topics, often in great detail. This makes it an invaluable resource for quick fact-checking, general research, and gaining a surface-level understanding of a subject.
Free Access
Wikipedia is free to use for anyone with internet access, reducing barriers to information and supporting educational equality.
Collaborative Editing
Articles on Wikipedia can be edited by anyone, allowing for a collaborative and dynamic creation and updating process. This can lead to quick corrections and diverse perspectives.
Citations and Sources
Many articles on Wikipedia include citations and references to external sources, which can be useful for further research and verification of the information provided.
Multilingual
Wikipedia is available in numerous languages, which helps make information accessible to a global audience.
Promote Wikipedia. You can add any of these badges on your website.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if Wikipedia is good.
Check the traffic stats of Wikipedia on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of Wikipedia on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of Wikipedia's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of Wikipedia on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about Wikipedia on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
Does anyone have any suggestions for fixing an issue I've been having with the Wikiwand extension? I haven't been able to get the link previews working the way they used to, and it's super frustrating and annoying when it works with the regular wikipedia.org page just fine. I'm unaware of any other extensions that I have that would be interacting (and I've tried on MS Edge with the same issue). Example pics... Source: almost 2 years ago
Without there being any client connected to the AP, it independently carries out DNS queries (Type: A, Plain DNS) to two addresses every few seconds (!): amazon.com and wikipedia.org. Source: almost 2 years ago
However some good came from this as we see from wikipedia.org. Source: over 2 years ago
This list was compiled by charles webster baer on june 11 , 2023 using information from wikipedia.org. Source: over 2 years ago
Forgive me if this is a exhausting question, but I did search both this and r/Portland and didn't find many answers. Anyway, for the past few years I've been juggling moving to Portland (or Denver) against how comfortable I am now. I love (LOVE) the weather here (barring anytime it's 110 or higher), but to my surprise Portland is reasonably temperate. (At least from what I see on weather.com and wikipedia.org) A... Source: over 2 years ago
It was long ago a well known fact that FBI took the domain, had the server "in their hands". Not sure about the mirrors (but normally `agencies` run everywhere, including tor nodes) so tldr is not to trust any site/mirror and that includes not to fully trust everything is on wikipedia.org. Maybe some facts are missing. Source: over 2 years ago
For a new player who knows nothing about Minecraft, they may be confused about what an item that they find is. I believe that it would be a great improvement to add an explanation of the item to help them and make sure that Minecraft is accessible to everyone. The creative inventory in the old console edition was a start, but I feel that they are not detailed or helpful enough. Luckily, there is a freely... Source: over 2 years ago
The fact that you're able to traceroute and ping wikipedia.org through ICMP doesn't necessarily mean that's NOT blocked. ISPs here have recently gone through measures where blocking a website doesn't necessarily greet you with the official 'Blocked in UAE' landing page, instead they're simply blacked out with a DSN error, similar to what we are seeing in the case of wikipedia.org. Source: over 2 years ago
Anyone using the DU Home Internet (Fiber network) unable to access wikipedia.org ? Checked over Etisalat cellular data and it works fine. Source: over 2 years ago
I know that some think the error is related to robots.txt (that is the file that prevents accessing certain files). But that can't be the cause. All visited web sites are listed in the drop down menu and for me the "Click failed" messages came for pages like cnn.com and wikipedia.org. These do not exclude their pages via robots.txt. And also: The pages worked a few hours later when I repeated the same prompt with... Source: over 2 years ago
At the end of the day there is no authority on open source things like bitcoin wallets or wikipedia.org. Do some research and get a feel for a consensus. If it's too good to be true then it probably is. Source: over 2 years ago
Art Film: a movie made primarily for aesthetic reasons rather than commercial profit, often of an experimental nature. Typically an independent film, aimed at a niche market rather than a mass market audience. (Dictionary.com , wikipedia.org ). Source: over 2 years ago
Import requests From bs4 import BeautifulSoup Res = requests.get("http://wikipedia.org") Print(type(res)) Soup = BeautifulSoup(res.text, "lxml") Print(soup). Source: over 2 years ago
I tried the question posed on birds and got an answer that was almost exclusively sourced from wikipedia.org site. I asked the question again with the instruction to exclude wikipedia.org as a source which it did except for one reference. Given the volume of data on such a topic I am surprised that the answer utilized wikipedia.org over other sources and struggled with an answer without it. Source: over 2 years ago
Wikipedia.org and other sites tourist books Or go home. Source: over 2 years ago
According to wikipedia.org, Japan's per capita rate of automobile ownership is lower than Germany, France, Spain or Italy. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_vehicles_per_capita. Source: over 2 years ago
Uff, that's an interesting filter ... :D wikipedia.org blocked in a school ... Might not be the brightest idea IMO. Source: over 2 years ago
So, you install your favorite Linux distro (or a specific Windows distro that you know is not compromised) on your computer, then go to https://wikipedia.org. Either you get through, or you don't. Source: over 2 years ago
Data: wikipedia.org. Language/Country pairs with at least 100 AFINN charged words. Source: over 2 years ago
Story sorta checks out. Wikipedia landing page for 'Penthouse' gives OP a link for the apartment and the magazine right next to eachother, easy misclick - but it still puts you on wikipedia.org with a pretty tame cover (I've seen more skin at the beach) so OP would be fine in that case, assuming their employer had monitoring that even cares. Source: over 2 years ago
From wikipedia.org: " Paxos was founded in 2012 and is based in New York City, with offices in London and Singapore. As of April 2021, the company has received $540 million in funding. ... In 2015, the company changed its legal name from itBit to Paxos Trust Company. At the same time, the Department of Financial Services of New York granted Paxos a limited-purpose trust charter, making it the first company in the... Source: over 2 years ago
Wikipedia (https://www.wikipedia.org) remains a highly regarded and frequently used resource across the globe, firmly identified within the product categorization of content collaboration, wikis, and note-taking domains. It employs the MediaWiki software, an open-source server-based engine that bolsters its robust and scalable framework, enabling users to edit content efficiently through a straightforward wiki-text format without needing advanced technical knowledge.
Accessibility and Usability: Public opinion consistently highlights Wikipedia's user-friendly interface, enabling a broad user base to access and contribute information without needing advanced technical skills. This accessibility is noted even in discussions where Wikipedia's data serves as a foundational resource or reference point — notably illustrated in examples like gig rankings or art film terminologies. Whether for casual inquiries or serious research, Wikipedia's wealth of information fosters significant reliance on its entries.
Information Depth and Breadth: Users often cite Wikipedia's detailed and comprehensive coverage of a vast array of topics as one of its critical strengths. Fora like Reddit have members regularly referring to Wikipedia for learning, fact-checking, and gaining insights into a variety of subjects, from geographical data to historical facts. Wikipedia is frequently referenced as a primary source in many discussions, signifying its widespread acceptance and utilization.
Accuracy and Trust: Despite its robust depth, Wikipedia has been subject to scrutiny over the trustworthiness of its content, mainly because it is a user-edited platform. Instances of concern have surfaced regarding the accuracy of information, notably where a user suggests not to "fully trust" information on Wikipedia, implying the potential for misinformation or incomplete facts.
Technical Issues and Accessibility Blocks: There are reported occurrences where Wikipedia access has been problematic due to technical or administrative reasons. For instance, within certain networks and geographical locations, users have faced blocks or errors, impacting its availability and accessibility. Moreover, technical issues have been noted in connection with extensions, as seen with the Wikiwand extension not working correctly, underscoring occasional technical hurdles users may encounter.
Community and Contribution Model: The open nature of Wikipedia fosters collaborative editing, yet this model can also lead to concerns regarding the management and quality control of contributions. The user-generated aspect sometimes leads to debates on the reliability of the information, as shown by discussions involving site access in politically sensitive contexts or culturally diverse issues.
Competitively, Wikipedia stands alongside a mix of resources like Fandom, Miraheze, and traditional counterparts like Encyclopædia Britannica. However, what distinctly sets Wikipedia apart is its open-source, user-driven architecture as opposed to the more controlled or commercial models of its competitors. This approach not only supports broad user involvement but simultaneously poses challenges regarding supervision and content validation.
In summary, Wikipedia continues to capitalize on its strengths in accessibility and comprehensive information availability while addressing issues pertaining to content verification and technical accessibility. As user engagement with digital information continues to evolve, Wikipedia's adaptability and robust community-driven model ensure its sustained relevance in the information landscape.
Do you know an article comparing Wikipedia to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is Wikipedia good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss Wikipedia here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.
