Software Alternatives & Startups

WhoGoes VS CodeinCloud

Compare WhoGoes VS CodeinCloud and see what are their differences

WhoGoes

Trade Show & Event Attendee Lists. With Proof.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Free $29 (200 credits)
CodeinCloud

CodeinCloud is the comprehensive IDE on the cloud by which you can connect your Live Servers through SSH Connection and your hosting directories with FTP access and Enjoy the Live Developments with beautifully designed code :)

Rating
0 reviews
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

WhoGoes
CodeinCloud
Website whogoes.co codeincloud.net
Pricing
Free $29 (200 credits) Official pricing
Company Startup from the United States · 1 - 9 employees · 2026 —
Listed in —

About WhoGoes and CodeinCloud

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

WhoGoes
CodeinCloud

WhoGoes: Trade Show & Event Attendee Lists. With Proof. WhoGoes is a trade show attendee data platform for B2B sales and marketing teams. It turns public LinkedIn posts into verified contact lists for 1,200+ events worldwide, covering tech (CES, Dreamforce, INBOUND), healthcare (HIMSS, RSNA),...

Read more about WhoGoes

No description of CodeinCloud yet.

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

WhoGoes 13 features
CodeinCloud 5 features
  • Events covered
    1,200+ trade shows and conferences worldwide
  • Contact database
    850K+ verified attendee contacts
  • Proof of attendance
    LinkedIn post linked to every contact, verifiable in one click
  • Email accuracy
    95%+ deliverability, validated via ZeroBounce
  • Data fields
    Verified work email, job title, company, LinkedIn URL
  • Free preview
    5 real contacts visible per event, no signup needed
  • Free tier
    20 credits on signup, no credit card required
  • Pricing
    Pay-per-contact from $29 for 200 contacts, no contracts
  • Credits
    Never expire, no minimums, no monthly fees
  • Export format
    CSV. Works with Salesforce, HubSpot, Outreach, Apollo, Salesloft, Instantly, Smartlead
  • Update cadence
    New events added within 48 hours of announcement
  • Coverage by vertical
    Tech, healthcare, retail, logistics, cybersecurity, finance
  • Data source
    Public LinkedIn posts, enriched via multiple email providers
  • Cloud-based development
    CodeinCloud offers a cloud-based coding environment, allowing developers to write, run, and manage code from anywhere without needing to set up a local development environment.
  • Accessibility
    Being web-based, the platform can be accessed from various devices and locations, making it convenient for remote work and collaboration across teams.
  • No local setup required
    Users can start coding quickly without installing IDEs, compilers, or dependencies on their own machines, which lowers the barrier to entry for beginners.
  • Potential for collaboration
    Cloud platforms often support real-time collaboration features, enabling multiple developers to work together on the same codebase efficiently.
  • Scalability
    Cloud infrastructure can typically scale resources up or down based on project needs, which is helpful for handling varying workloads.

Possible disadvantages

  • Internet dependency
    As a cloud-based service, it requires a stable internet connection to function, which can be a limitation in areas with poor connectivity or during outages.
  • Limited information available
    There is relatively little publicly available detail about the platform's specific features, pricing, and reliability, making it harder to evaluate thoroughly.
  • Data privacy concerns
    Storing code and projects on a third-party cloud raises potential security and privacy considerations, especially for sensitive or proprietary projects.
  • Potential performance limitations
    Cloud-based environments may experience latency or performance constraints compared to a powerful local development setup, depending on the service tier.
  • Vendor lock-in
    Relying on a specific cloud platform may make it difficult to migrate projects elsewhere, creating dependency on the provider's continued operation and pricing.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

WhoGoes
CodeinCloud

Overall verdict

  • WhoGoes appears to be a niche or lesser-known service, and without verified, up-to-date information about its features, pricing, and user reviews, it's not possible to confidently confirm its quality or reliability. I'd recommend researching current user reviews, checking for business legitimacy, and testing any free tier before committing.

Why this product is good

  • Insufficient verified information available about this specific product's features and performance
  • Cannot confirm current business legitimacy or operational status
  • No access to recent user reviews or ratings to assess real-world satisfaction
  • Unable to verify pricing, customer support quality, or data security practices

Recommended for

  • Users willing to do independent due diligence before signing up
  • Those comfortable trying newer or lesser-known services with caution
  • Individuals who can verify legitimacy through direct research, reviews, and trial periods

Overall verdict

  • I don't have verified, up-to-date information about CodeinCloud (codeincloud.net) to confidently assess its quality, reliability, or reputation. I cannot find reliable details about its features, pricing, user reviews, or business legitimacy in my training data, and I'm unable to browse the internet to check current information.

Why this product is good

  • Insufficient verified information available about this specific service to make reliability claims
  • No confirmed data on user reviews, uptime, customer support quality, or pricing structure
  • Cannot verify company legitimacy, ownership, or how long it has been operating
  • Unable to confirm security practices, data handling policies, or compliance certifications

Recommended for

  • Not able to provide a recommendation without additional verified information
  • Suggest checking independent review sites like Trustpilot, G2, or Reddit for user experiences
  • Consider verifying through domain registration lookups (e.g., WHOIS) for company transparency
  • Look for verifiable customer testimonials, uptime guarantees, and clear refund/support policies before committing
  • If considering this service, test with a small trial or free tier first if available before committing to a paid plan

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
WhoGoes
CodeinCloud
100% 100%
0% 0%
100% 100%
0% 0%
100% 100%
0% 0%
100% 100%
0% 0%

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing WhoGoes and CodeinCloud.

What makes your product unique?

WhoGoes's answer

Every contact comes with a clickable LinkedIn post showing the person publicly said they're attending the event. Open the post. Confirm the record. That single proof layer doesn't exist on any other attendee data platform. Bombora and 6sense give you anonymous account-level intent signals, list resellers sell historical data with no source attribution, and badge scraping at the booth gives you data weeks after the show floor has already closed. WhoGoes gives you named individuals with verified work emails sourced from posts published about upcoming events, available before the show opens. Free to browse. No login needed.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

WhoGoes's answer

Three reasons. Lower price, real proof, faster timing.

On price: $29 for 200 contacts versus Bombora at $25,000 per year and 6sense at $50,000 per year. No contracts. No minimums.

On proof: every record links to the public LinkedIn post where the contact said they're attending, so any rep on your team can verify a contact in under 10 seconds before sending a single email. PullAList and VisitorsList don't offer that sourcing transparency.

On timing: data is sourced from posts about upcoming events instead of historical lists from prior years, which means SDRs and field marketers can build pre-event outreach lists weeks before the show opens rather than getting badge-scrape data after the floor closes.

How would you describe the primary audience of your product?

WhoGoes's answer

B2B sales and marketing teams who need to reach trade show attendees before the show happens. That's the core ICP. Pretty narrow.

SDRs and BDRs at SaaS and services companies run pre-event outreach campaigns to reach attendees before the booth goes up, opening with real context pulled from the prospect's own LinkedIn post instead of a cold pitch. Field marketers and event marketers book meetings and dinners before the show floor opens. Exhibitors and sponsors check whether target accounts are actually attending before committing $15,000 to a booth.

Smaller teams without intent data budgets get the most value, since $29 unlocks the same kind of named-contact data that Bombora and 6sense gate behind $25,000 to $50,000 annual contracts.

What's the story behind your product?

WhoGoes's answer

Sales reps had been manually digging through LinkedIn before every trade show, copy-pasting names from posts about CES, HIMSS, and Dreamforce into spreadsheets, then hunting down work emails one by one. Hours per event. Most quit halfway.

The fix was obvious. If the data is sitting in public posts, automate the extraction, verify the emails, link every record back to the source post for proof, and price it so a single SDR can buy it without a procurement cycle.

WhoGoes launched in 2023 from San Francisco, US. The bet was that pay-as-you-go pricing plus public source attribution would beat the $25,000-a-year platforms for teams who don't need anonymous account intent and would rather have named individuals with verifiable proof.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

WhoGoes's answer

WhoGoes runs on a modern TypeScript stack. Serverless throughout. No legacy code.

  • Frontend: Next.js 16 (App Router), React 19, TypeScript, TailwindCSS v4
  • Backend: Supabase (PostgreSQL, Auth, Row-Level Security)
  • Hosting: Vercel
  • Email validation: ZeroBounce
  • Payments: Razorpay
  • Email automation: Loops.so
  • Data enrichment: Multiple email providers
  • Content/SEO: MDX blog, JSON-LD structured data, IndexNow

The whole stack is serverless and pay-as-you-grow, which keeps unit economics tight enough to offer $29 starter credits without bleeding margin and lets the product ship new features without a DevOps team or an SRE pager rotation.

User comments

Share your experience with using WhoGoes and CodeinCloud. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Alternatives to WhoGoes and CodeinCloud

When comparing WhoGoes and CodeinCloud, you can also consider the following products.