Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login
w

weborf VS lighttpd

Compare weborf VS lighttpd and see what are their differences

LibHunt
LibHunt tracks mentions of software libraries on relevant social networks. Based on that data, you can find the most popular projects and their alternatives. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

weborf logo weborf

Weborf is a lightweight webserver designed to rapidly share directories. Runs on POSIX systems.

lighttpd logo lighttpd

A secure, fast, compliant, and very flexible web-server that has been optimized for high-performance environments
  • weborf Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-09-09
  • lighttpd Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-28

weborf features and specs

  • Lightweight
    Weborf is designed to be a lightweight web server, consuming minimal resources which makes it suitable for use on low-powered devices or systems with limited resources.
  • Easy Setup
    The server can be set up quickly with minimal configuration required, making it accessible for users who need a simple solution without complex setup processes.
  • Single Executable
    Weborf runs as a single executable file, reducing the complexity involved in deployment and ensuring ease of use.
  • Directory Listing
    It provides automatic directory listing functionalities, which can be useful for quickly sharing files over a network.
  • CGI Support
    Weborf supports CGI (Common Gateway Interface), allowing dynamic content generation, which enhances its usability for simple application hosting.

Possible disadvantages of weborf

  • Limited Features
    Compared to more established web servers like Apache or Nginx, Weborf offers limited features, which might not be suitable for complex web applications.
  • Security Concerns
    Being lightweight and less feature-rich means it may lack advanced security features, making it less suitable for deployment in environments where security is a major concern.
  • Less Documentation
    The available documentation and community support for Weborf are limited, which can be a barrier for new users seeking guidance and troubleshooting assistance.
  • Performance Bottlenecks
    While suitable for light traffic, Weborf might not handle heavy loads efficiently, posing potential performance issues if not properly managed.
  • Niche Usage
    Weborf is targeted at a specific niche of users who need a simple and lightweight web server, which limits its adoption in mainstream or enterprise environments.

lighttpd features and specs

  • Low Memory Footprint
    Lighttpd is known for its low memory usage, making it ideal for environments where memory resources are limited.
  • High Performance
    It is designed to handle large numbers of parallel connections efficiently, making it suitable for high-traffic websites.
  • Easy to Configure
    Lighttpd offers straightforward configuration files that are easy to understand and modify.
  • Supports FastCGI, SCGI, and CGI
    It has built-in support for various interfaces like FastCGI, SCGI, and CGI, allowing it to interact with different types of applications.
  • Event-Driven Architecture
    The event-driven design allows for non-blocking and asynchronous operations, contributing to its speed and efficiency.

Possible disadvantages of lighttpd

  • Limited Module Support
    Lighttpd has fewer third-party modules and plugins compared to more popular web servers like Apache and Nginx.
  • Community Support
    The community around Lighttpd is smaller, which might result in slower updates and fewer tutorials or examples.
  • Learning Curve
    New users might find the initial setup and configuration challenging compared to more widely-used web servers.
  • Compatibility Issues
    Some applications or tools that are designed with Apache or Nginx in mind might not work seamlessly with Lighttpd.
  • Less Frequent Updates
    The development and release cycle for Lighttpd updates may not be as frequent as for more popular web servers.

Analysis of lighttpd

Overall verdict

  • Overall, lighttpd is a highly recommended choice for those needing a lightweight and efficient web server, especially where system resources are constrained.

Why this product is good

  • Lighttpd is often considered a good web server because it is designed to be fast, secure, and very lightweight. It effectively handles large volumes of traffic, supports important features like FastCGI, SCGI, Auth, Output Compression, URL Rewriting, and is highly configurable. Its asynchronous architecture allows it to serve multiple requests simultaneously, making it suitable for environments with high concurrency.

Recommended for

    Lighttpd is especially suited for situations where low resource usage is a priority, such as on embedded systems or servers with limited hardware capabilities. It is also useful for hosting static content, serving as a reverse proxy, or when hosting web applications with specific performance requirements.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to weborf and lighttpd)

weborf

lighttpd

Web Servers
9 9%
Web Servers
91% 91
Web And Application Servers
8 8%
Web And Application Servers
92% 92
Application Server
9 9%
Application Server
91% 91
HTTP/2 Web Server
100 100%
HTTP/2 Web Server
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using weborf and lighttpd. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare weborf and lighttpd

weborf Reviews

We have no reviews of weborf yet.
Be the first one to post

lighttpd Reviews

13 Best XAMPP Alternatives
Lighttpd is a simple and lightweight web server that allows you to do very fast static file serving. It can also be used as a content cache, a reverse proxy, or an HTTP accelerator. Lighttpd is not only lightning-fast but also straightforward to set up; in many cases, you only need one configuration file to work. Lighttpd has been around for some time now, so there are...
Source: thetechtian.com
Top 5 open source web servers
Great article Robin. Most of my experience is with Apache. I first started using it on Windows about 1998 or 1999. When I got into using Linux in 2001 I switched my previous install to that OS and have since deployed it many times. I have tried NGINX and lighttpd but never in production.
Source: opensource.com
Alternative web servers compared: Lighttpd, Nginx, LiteSpeed and Zeus
The huge leap for Lighttpd in January-March of 2007 is most likely due to one or more web hosting or domain registration companies switching over to Lighttpd either for their regular pages, or for parked pages, or both. If anyone knows what happened there in more detail, please feel free to let us know in the comments.
Source: www.pingdom.com

What are some alternatives?

When comparing weborf and lighttpd, you can also consider the following products

Apache HTTP Server - Apache httpd has been the most popular web server on the Internet since April 1996

LiteSpeed Web Server (LSWS) - LiteSpeed Web Server Documentation - Server General

Microsoft IIS - Internet Information Services is a web server for Microsoft Windows

nginx - A high performance free open source web server powering busiest sites on the Internet.

Apache Tomcat - An open source software implementation of the Java Servlet and JavaServer Pages technologies

webfs - webfs is a simple HTTP server for mostly static content.

Loading...