Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login
w

webfs VS LiteSpeed Web Server (LSWS)

Compare webfs VS LiteSpeed Web Server (LSWS) and see what are their differences

Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

webfs logo webfs

webfs is a simple HTTP server for mostly static content.

LiteSpeed Web Server (LSWS) logo LiteSpeed Web Server (LSWS)

LiteSpeed Web Server Documentation - Server General
  • webfs Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-05
  • LiteSpeed Web Server (LSWS) Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-05-30

webfs features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

LiteSpeed Web Server (LSWS) features and specs

  • High Performance
    LiteSpeed Web Server is known for its high performance and speed, especially under high traffic conditions. It uses event-driven architecture which helps handle thousands of connections with minimal resource usage.
  • HTTP/3 Support
    LSWS offers full HTTP/3 support, which is beneficial for improved load times and performance by utilizing new protocol advantages over older versions like HTTP/1.1 and HTTP/2.
  • Built-in Caching
    LiteSpeed includes built-in server-side caching mechanisms such as LiteSpeed Cache, which significantly boosts loading times and reduces server load.
  • Security Features
    LSWS provides robust security features, including DDoS protection, support for mod_security rules, and features like reCAPTCHA for login pages.
  • Compatibility with Apache
    LiteSpeed is designed to be a drop-in replacement for Apache, and it is compatible with Apache configuration files (.htaccess), making migration smooth and easy.

Possible disadvantages of LiteSpeed Web Server (LSWS)

  • License Cost
    Unlike some alternatives like Apache or Nginx, LiteSpeed Web Server is a paid software, which means there are licensing costs associated with its use.
  • Administration Complexity
    For those unfamiliar with it, configuring and managing LiteSpeed might present a learning curve, especially for people accustomed to using free, widely-used software like Apache.
  • Limited Open-Source Contributions
    As LiteSpeed is not open-source, it has a smaller community of developers and limited third-party contributions compared to open-source alternatives.
  • Compatibility Issues
    While LSWS is highly compatible with Apache, certain extensions or modules may not be fully supported, leading to potential compatibility issues with some applications.
  • Resource Usage
    Although LiteSpeed is optimized for high performance, it may appear to utilize more resources than needed when not configured correctly, especially in smaller or low-traffic environments.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to webfs and LiteSpeed Web Server (LSWS))

webfs

LiteSpeed Web Server (LSWS)

Application Server
42 42%
Application Server
58% 58
Web Servers
38 38%
Web Servers
62% 62
Web And Application Servers
38 38%
Web And Application Servers
62% 62
HTTP/2 Web Server
50 50%
HTTP/2 Web Server
50% 50

User comments

Share your experience with using webfs and LiteSpeed Web Server (LSWS). For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing webfs and LiteSpeed Web Server (LSWS), you can also consider the following products

Apache HTTP Server - Apache httpd has been the most popular web server on the Internet since April 1996

nginx - A high performance free open source web server powering busiest sites on the Internet.

lighttpd - A secure, fast, compliant, and very flexible web-server that has been optimized for high-performance environments

Caddy - The HTTP/2 Web Server with Automatic HTTPS

Microsoft IIS - Internet Information Services is a web server for Microsoft Windows

H2O HTTP server - H2O is a new generation HTTP server that provides quicker response to users with less CPU, memory bandwidth utilization when compared to older generation of web servers.

Loading...