Software Alternatives & Reviews

Web Components VS ClojureScript

Compare Web Components VS ClojureScript and see what are their differences

Web Components logo Web Components

Native/Vanilla web components.

ClojureScript logo ClojureScript

A Clojure compiler targeting JavaScript
  • Web Components Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-11-04
  • ClojureScript Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-06

Web Components videos

Web Components: The Secret Ingredient Helping Power The Web

More videos:

  • Review - React vs Web Components?
  • Review - A Review of Web Components in 2020 - Bit.dev

ClojureScript videos

How to use NPM Packages in ClojureScript

More videos:

  • Review - ClojureScript - Chris Houser
  • Review - ClojureScript Release - Rich Hickey

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Web Components and ClojureScript)
Personal Finance
27 27%
73% 73
Financial Planner
38 38%
62% 62
Android
40 40%
60% 60
Cryptocurrencies
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Web Components and ClojureScript. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, ClojureScript seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 17 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Web Components mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Web Components yet. Tracking of Web Components recommendations started around Mar 2021.

ClojureScript mentions (17)

  • jQuery v4.0.0 Beta
    LISP in the browser! You end up having to shit a large runtime with your app but it all transpiles to vanilla JS. https://clojurescript.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • Ask HN: Why don't browsers just build a non-JS interpreter?
    JS isn't perfect, but it's good enough. And there is ongoing effort to make it even better. Also, many other languages compile to JS (without WASM). Notably: - https://www.typescriptlang.org/ - https://coffeescript.org/ - https://clojurescript.org/ - https://www.transcrypt.org/ I wrote https://multi-launch.leftium.com, which is only 6% JS. The majority is Svelte (65%) + TypeScript (27%). ( - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • Implement functional programming in Sass
    A few years ago, I started learning the ClojureScript language and quickly became fascinated with functional programming. One day, I wondered if it would be possible to implement a similar programming style in Sass, allowing for anonymous functions and threading macros. After conducting some experiments, I came up with the following Sass functions:. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
  • HTMX is the future
    I also didn't cheat by transpiling Clojure into JavaScript. (see ClojureScript). - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Which dialect to choose.
    Clojure has also a mature compiler to JavaScript. https://clojurescript.org/. Source: about 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Web Components and ClojureScript, you can also consider the following products

Fay - A proper subset of Haskell that compiles to JavaScript - faylang/fay

ReasonML - ReasonML is a new face to OCaml that--when coupled with BuckleScript--makes web development easy...

GHCJS - Haskell to JavaScript compiler, based on GHC. Contribute to ghcjs/ghcjs development by creating an account on GitHub.

PureScript - PureScript is a small strongly typed programming language that compiles to JavaScript.

Mint - Free personal finance software to assist you to manage your money, financial planning, and budget planning tools. Achieve your financial goals with Mint.

Haste - Decreases ping in video games.