Software Alternatives & Reviews
Register | Login

GHCJS VS Web Components

Compare GHCJS VS Web Components and see what are their differences

ComplyCube
Verify your customers in under 15 seconds anywhere in the world with a cutting-edge SaaS & API platform for Identity Verification and AML/KYC compliance. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

GHCJS logo GHCJS

Haskell to JavaScript compiler, based on GHC. Contribute to ghcjs/ghcjs development by creating an account on GitHub.

Web Components logo Web Components

Native/Vanilla web components.
  • GHCJS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-10
  • Web Components Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-11-04

GHCJS videos

No GHCJS videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Web Components videos

+ Add

Web Components: The Secret Ingredient Helping Power The Web

More videos:

  • Review - React vs Web Components?
  • Review - A Review of Web Components in 2020 - Bit.dev

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to GHCJS and Web Components)

GHCJS

Web Components

Personal Finance
64 64%
Personal Finance
36% 36
Financial Planner
57 57%
Financial Planner
43% 43
Android
53 53%
Android
47% 47
iPhone
59 59%
iPhone
41% 41

User comments

Share your experience with using GHCJS and Web Components. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, GHCJS seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 4 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

GHCJS mentions (4)

  • Secretly introduced rust in my company, now they love it!
    There is a fork that compiles to js https://github.com/ghcjs/ghcjs compiler, and I believe the official glasgow compiler is working towards also supporting js/wasm (although I don't think they are supported as of yet). Source: about 1 year ago
  • Is GHCJS stuck on GHC 8.6.5?
    Default branch on ghcjs github is 8.6. 8.10 is a wip with commit from around a month ago. Source: about 3 years ago
  • Why Do We Need Transpilation into JavaScript?
    At present, here at Typeable we develop frontend in Haskell and use the web framework Reflex and the functional reactive programming (FRP). The source code in Haskell is transpiled into the JavaScript code using GHCJS. - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago
  • Why supporting all programming languages is a bad idea
    In theory it is possible to write applications that run in the web browser in Java or C# or C++. There are compilers to compile Java to JavaScript or C++ to JavaScript/WebAssembly and a C# runtime that runs in the browser. In practice these technologies are very niche and only used for very few applications. The Cardano Wallet Daedalus is written in JavaScript even though most of the software for Cardano is... Source: about 3 years ago

Web Components mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Web Components yet. Tracking of Web Components recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing GHCJS and Web Components, you can also consider the following products

ReasonML - ReasonML is a new face to OCaml that--when coupled with BuckleScript--makes web development easy...

Fay - A proper subset of Haskell that compiles to JavaScript - faylang/fay

Mint - Free personal finance software to assist you to manage your money, financial planning, and budget planning tools. Achieve your financial goals with Mint.

Scala.js - Build robust front-end web applications in Scala with Scala.js

PureScript - PureScript is a small strongly typed programming language that compiles to JavaScript.

Haste - Decreases ping in video games.

Loading...