Vana Reviews

1. Volodymyr

   · Working at Hata · over 2 years ago
   Volodymyr

   This app brings me joy by enabling the creation of a virtual self.

   👍 Pros:    Well designed|Powerful
2. Taharob

   over 2 years ago
   Excellent vana

   I'm thrilled to share my thoughts on Vana after experiencing it firsthand. This app is truly remarkable and sets a new standard in innovation. The way it integrates your personality traits into a mini version of yourself adds a captivating dimension to the overall user experience. Seeing the mini version of yourself engage in conversations and exhibit behavior similar to yours is both entertaining and thought-provoking. It provides a distinct opportunity for self-reflection as you witness how your traits are portrayed in digital form.

3. Sabbir

   · Manager at null · over 2 years ago
   Vana: My Ideal Digital Twin

   All is good

   🏁 Competitors: Zendesk

   👍 Pros:    Create a personalized mini-you ("gotchi"): craft a unique digital twin mirroring your voice, appearance, and data for a personalized self-exploration journey. tailored interactions: receive customized games, simulations, and ai assistant tools based on your gotchi's characteristics, enhancing the user experience. self-discovery: engage in meaningful conversations and explore diverse facets of yourself through interactive sessions with your gotchi.

   👎 Cons:    Ethical considerations: address potential privacy concerns and biases in the ai development process to ensure responsible and ethical use. unclear target audience: the broad appeal to "everyone" may necessitate clearer value propositions for different user groups, enhancing market relevance and engagement.

GitHub Copilot Reviews

1. Stan

   · Founder at SaaSHub · over 2 years ago
   Indispensable

   It definitely increases my productivity.

   🏁 Competitors: Tabnine

Vana mentions (0)

GitHub Copilot mentions (388)

• Test smarter with Snagly: 30 open-source QA skills for AI coding agents

  Snagly is a free, MIT-licensed set of 30 skills for AI coding agents — GitHub Copilot, Claude Code, Cursor, Codex and 70+ others — that turn "an AI that can drive a browser" into "an AI that tests like a QA professional." A skill, if you haven't met them yet, is a reusable instruction set that teaches the agent a specific working method — when to use it, what rigor it requires, what evidence to capture, and what... - Source: dev.to / 5 days ago

• I almost credited llms.txt for a Google AI Mode win. Then I read what Google actually says.

  Where llms.txt genuinely gets read is a different layer: coding and agent tooling — Cursor, Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Windsurf — pulling a documentation site's pages with less token waste, plus emerging agent protocols like OpenAI's Agents SDK. That's real, and it's growing fast. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago

• GitHub Copilot for Engineers: Getting Better Results

  You need an active GitHub Copilot subscription. Plans are available at individual, business, and enterprise tiers at github.com/features/copilot. Once active, all tools use your GitHub account credentials. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago

• Agentic: Which App/Harness Is Best for Angular Development?

  For over a decade PhpStorm (starting in my WordPress era) and later WebStorm have been my main IDEs for web development. So when GitHub Copilot launched, it was a natural choice to try it out in WebStorm. It was one of the first AI coding tools I used, and it had a big impact on how I thought about AI-assisted coding. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago

• Your Design System Needs An MCP Server

  Before we get into it, there are some things about AI usage worth addressing. I've had my fair share of scepticism in the past, but recent model releases have made it increasingly difficult to argue that AI isn't a viable tool for the majority of workstreams, including building user interfaces. Most large language models are trained on public data scraped from the internet, which means your internal design system... - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago