
DISQUS
giscus
Cusdis
ReplyBox
talkatv
HashOver
Remark42
A lightweight comments widget built on GitHub issues.

DogQ.io
Testpine
Cypress.io
TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)
TestSprite
Octomind.run
ACCELQ
Just get it tested. End-to-end web testing without code.

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, utterances seems to be a lot more popular than DoesQA. While we know about 53 links to utterances, we've tracked only 1 mention of DoesQA.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | utteranc.es | does.qa |
| Pricing | ||
| Platforms | — | |
| Company | — | 2023 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of utterances yet.
DoesQA is the most powerful web test automation tool: end-to-end testing for every web journey, from sign-up to checkout, with no code to write or maintain. Write steps in plain language or branch real user forks on a visual canvas. Built-in email and real MFA tokens reach the paths coded suites...
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
No analysis of DoesQA yet.
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
SEMANTICS-7: Utterances, Sentences & Propositions
DoesQA - Just get it tested
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing utterances and DoesQA.
DoesQA's answer:
DoesQA simplifies test creation and improves reliability while keeping the tester in control. With unlimited concurrency as standard there's no faster way to create or run your tests.
DoesQA's answer:
DoesQA is the only solution which supports branching tests, API requests and Lighthouse Audits. DoesQA was built by experienced SDETs to make testing simpler, faster and more cost-effective while allowing all the power which comes with a traditional code-based solution.
DoesQA's answer:
Engineering teams who want powerful web end-to-end automation tests without the costs typically associated with building a test framework and running tests remotely.
DoesQA's answer:
Everyone's endlessly wasting money building their own test framework.
Share your experience with using utterances and DoesQA. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Utterances: **The primary inspiration for giscus. It uses **GitHub Issues instead of Discussions to store comments. It is extremely lightweight but does not support threaded replies as natively as giscus. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
Title: [TIL][Jekyll] Removing Disqus and switching to utteranc to use github issue as article comments Published: false Date: 2021-05-14 00:00:00 UTC Tags: Canonical_url:... - Source: dev.to / over 5 years ago
'use client'; Import { useEffect, useRef } from 'react'; Const Comments = ({ issueTerm }) => { const commentsSection = useRef(null); useEffect(() => { const script = document.createElement('script'); script.src =... - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
Hey, DoesQA here, we have a compatible set of steps as WebdriverIO but as a codeless test automation tool. Source: over 3 years ago
When comparing utterances and DoesQA, you can also consider the following products.

Disqus is a global comment system that improves discussion on websites and connects conversations across the web.
Compare DISQUS to utterances or DoesQA:

No-code tests in cloud for web developers with all skill levels
Compare DogQ.io to utterances or DoesQA:

A comments system powered by GitHub Discussions. Let visitors leave comments and reactions on your website via GitHub!
Compare giscus to utterances or DoesQA:

No Code Test Automation for Web & Mobile and Test Management
Compare Testpine to utterances or DoesQA:

Open-source, lightweight comment system for your website
Compare Cusdis to utterances or DoesQA:

Slow, difficult and unreliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Install Cypress in seconds and take the pain out of front-end testing.
Compare Cypress.io to utterances or DoesQA: