utterances VS CrossBrowserTesting

utterances

A lightweight comments widget built on GitHub issues.

CrossBrowserTesting

Browser Testing made simple! Run automated, visual, and manual tests on 1500+ real browsers and mobile devices. Test more browsers, in less time.

Landing page //
2022-03-30

Landing page //
2023-10-23

utterances

Website: utteranc.es
Pricing URL: -
$ Details

Edit details

CrossBrowserTesting

Website: crossbrowsertesting.com
Pricing URL: Official CrossBrowserTesting Pricing
$ Details: -

Edit details

utterances features and specs

GitHub Authentication
Utterances uses GitHub issues for comments, meaning users authenticate via GitHub. This can reduce spam and ensures that commenters have a verified identity.
Lightweight and Fast
Utterances is designed to be lightweight and load quickly, benefiting site performance and user experience.
Markdown Support
Since it leverages GitHub issues, users can write comments in Markdown, which many developers and technical users appreciate.
GitHub Integration
Comments are managed through GitHub issues, making them easy to track, moderate, and integrate into your development workflow.
Open Source
Utterances is open source, allowing developers to review the code, contribute, and customize it to their needs.

Possible disadvantages of utterances

Dependency on GitHub
Comments are entirely reliant on GitHub's infrastructure, which means any downtime or issues with GitHub services can affect the commenting system.
Limited to GitHub Users
Only users with GitHub accounts can comment, which may exclude or discourage participation from users who are not developers or familiar with GitHub.
No Anonymity
Because commenting requires a GitHub account, users cannot comment anonymously, which might be a drawback for some communities.
Moderation Complexity
Moderating comments requires managing GitHub issues, which can be cumbersome compared to dedicated comment moderation tools.
Feature Limitations
Utterances is relatively simple and lacks advanced features found in other commenting systems, like rich media support, voting, or detailed analytics.

CrossBrowserTesting features and specs

Wide Range of Browsers and Devices
CrossBrowserTesting offers a large selection of browsers and devices, allowing developers to test their applications in various environments to ensure compatibility.
Live Testing
Users can perform live interactive testing on real devices, enabling them to manually verify the behavior of their application and catch issues that automated tests might miss.
Automated Testing Integration
The platform provides integration with popular testing frameworks and tools such as Selenium, Appium, and others, facilitating automated testing workflows.
Visual Testing
CrossBrowserTesting offers visual testing capabilities, allowing users to compare screenshots from different browsers to identify design inconsistencies.
Comprehensive Reports
Detailed test reports with screenshots and logs are generated, helping users to quickly identify and address issues found during testing.
Parallel Testing
The service supports parallel testing, enabling users to run multiple tests simultaneously, significantly reducing the overall testing time.
Easy-to-Use Interface
The user interface is intuitive and user-friendly, making it easy for both beginners and experienced testers to navigate and utilize the platform effectively.

Possible disadvantages of CrossBrowserTesting

Cost
CrossBrowserTesting can be expensive, especially for small teams or individual developers who might find the subscription plans to be cost-prohibitive.
Performance
Tests on real devices can sometimes be slow due to the availability and network constraints, which can affect the overall efficiency of the testing process.
Limited Mobile Devices
While the platform includes a variety of devices, the selection might not cover all the latest models or less common devices, potentially limiting testing coverage.
Learning Curve for Advanced Features
Some advanced features and integrations might require a learning curve, which could be challenging for users who are not familiar with automated testing or the specific tools supported.
Test Timeout Issues
Occasional issues with test timeouts have been reported, which can disrupt the testing process and require reruns or additional troubleshooting.

Analysis of utterances

Overall verdict

Utterances is generally considered a good option for integrating a commenting system.

Why this product is good

It is lightweight and doesn't add significant loading time to web pages.
Utterances uses GitHub issues to store comments, which integrates well for projects already using GitHub for version control.
Installation is straightforward, making it easy to implement on static sites, particularly those generated with Jekyll or Hugo.
The comments are stored on GitHub's infrastructure, which is reliable and robust.

Recommended for

Developers and bloggers already using GitHub for project hosting.
Technical blogs and sites generated with static site generators like Jekyll or Hugo.
Users who prefer a minimalistic and efficient commenting system over more feature-rich alternatives.
Those looking for an open-source, privacy-friendly commenting solution.

Analysis of CrossBrowserTesting

Overall verdict

CrossBrowserTesting is generally regarded as a good solution for cross-browser testing needs, particularly for teams that require real-time testing and robust automation capabilities. Its ease of use, extensive browser/device coverage, and integration options make it a strong choice for many development and QA teams.

Why this product is good

CrossBrowserTesting is considered a valuable tool because it provides a cloud-based platform for testing websites and mobile applications across different browsers, devices, and operating systems. It enables developers and QA teams to ensure that their applications function correctly on various platforms without needing to maintain a complex setup of physical devices. The platform offers real-time debugging, automated screenshot testing, and integration with various CI/CD tools, which streamlines the testing process.

Recommended for

This service is highly recommended for software development teams, QA engineers, and web developers who need to ensure compatibility and functionality of their web applications across multiple browsers and devices. It is particularly useful for organizations with a focus on maintaining high-quality user experiences across various platforms.

utterances videos

+ Add

SEMANTICS-7: Utterances, Sentences & Propositions

CrossBrowserTesting videos

+ Add

Cross Browser Testing Tool Comparison – LambdaTest vs. CrossBrowserTesting

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to utterances and CrossBrowserTesting)

utterances

CrossBrowserTesting

Social Networks

100 100%

Social Networks

0% 0

Website Testing

0 0%

Website Testing

100% 100

Project Management

73 73%

Project Management

27% 27

Browser Testing

0 0%

Browser Testing

100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using utterances and CrossBrowserTesting. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, utterances should be more popular than CrossBrowserTesting. It has been mentiond 53 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

utterances mentions (53)

Adding Giscus Comments to Next.js Blog Pages
Utterances: **The primary inspiration for giscus. It uses **GitHub Issues instead of Discussions to store comments. It is extremely lightweight but does not support threaded replies as natively as giscus. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
[TIL][Jekyll] Replacing Disqus with utterances for GitHub issue comments
Title: [TIL][Jekyll] Removing Disqus and switching to utteranc to use github issue as article comments Published: false Date: 2021-05-14 00:00:00 UTC Tags: Canonical_url: http://www.evanlin.com/jekyll-remove-disqus/ --- ![](http://www.evanlin.com/images/2021/github_comment.jpg) ## Preface: ![](https://jekyllrb.com/img/jekyll-og.png) The escalation of the pandemic disrupted the original travel plans, but... - Source: dev.to / about 5 years ago
Add Utterances Comment System in Next.js App in App Router
'use client'; Import { useEffect, useRef } from 'react'; Const Comments = ({ issueTerm }) => { const commentsSection = useRef(null); useEffect(() => { const script = document.createElement('script'); script.src = 'https://utteranc.es/client.js'; script.async = true; script.crossOrigin = 'anonymous'; script.setAttribute('repo', 'shade-cool/article'); script.setAttribute('issue-term',... - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
Converting BlogCFC blog to Eleventy
Handling New Comments: There are excellent lightweight comment utilities available for managing comments on your eleventy blog. I personally use Utterances, but Giscus is also a great alternative. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
Unleash Your Dev Blog: Write More with GitHub Issues as Your CMS
We can use utteranc.es, a lightweight comment widget built on GitHub Issues to integrate authed comments in our blog. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago

CrossBrowserTesting mentions (6)

How can I test my site on safari if I don't have a Mac ?
Yeah I moved on pretty quick from browserstack, but it seems to be the most popular. I've tried crossbrowsertesting.com but at the moment I really like app.lambdatest.com. Source: almost 4 years ago
great list of "cool" sites from hnews
Https://geizhals.de/ - this is a german site but the UI is nice and you can find a lot of stuff. Https://www.gsmarena.com/search.php3? - a phone search site. When I was at https://crossbrowsertesting.com we used this site a lot Https://www.howacarworks.com/ - how a car works Https://www.mcmaster.com/ - the UI here is so nice. Those illustrations Https://ciechanow.ski/mechanical-watch/ - how does a mechanical... - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago
Learn How To Create, Test and Deploy a Single Page App with Vue 3 + Vite and Pinia
Fortunately we don’t need to install, nor configure, any other tools, unless maybe some fancy reporters, but for now we can get everything we need in terms of end-to-end automated testing out of Nightwatch. Besides Chrome, Nightwatch has built-in support for all major browsers, including Firefox, Edge, and Safari, all thanks to its integration with the W3C Webdriver API and Selenium. It also allows you to use... - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago
Free for dev - list of software (SaaS, PaaS, IaaS, etc.)
Crossbrowsertesting.com - Manual, Visual, and Selenium Browser Testing in the cloud - free for Open Source. - Source: dev.to / about 5 years ago
How do y’all test responsiveness of website?
Professionally, I do basically the same for dev testing. We also have various devices on different platforms/versions in the office when needed, and our QA team primarily uses Cross Browser Testing Tool. If I need to check something specific, I usually use CBT. Source: over 5 years ago