Software Alternatives & Startups

Usetiful VS CrossBrowserTesting

Compare Usetiful VS CrossBrowserTesting and see what are their differences

Usetiful

Fight user churn with great user onboarding. Interactive product tours and smart tips significantly improve your user retention.

Rating
4.5 · 2 reviews
Pricing
Freemium Free trial €29 / Monthly
CrossBrowserTesting

Browser Testing made simple! Run automated, visual, and manual tests on 1500+ real browsers and mobile devices. Test more browsers, in less time.

Rating
0 reviews
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, CrossBrowserTesting seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 6 times since March 2021.

social mentions
0 vs 6
User Onboarding And Engagement popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
120 vs 132

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Usetiful
CrossBrowserTesting
Website usetiful.com crossbrowsertesting.com
Pricing
Freemium Free trial €29 / Monthly Official pricing
Platforms
Web Browser Google Chrome Cross Platform JavaScript Mobile React Native +4
—
Company Startup from the Czech Republic —
Listed in

About Usetiful and CrossBrowserTesting

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

Usetiful
CrossBrowserTesting

Usetiful bridges the gap between users and digital systems. Guided tours and smart tips allow users to master any software system from day one. Usetiful provides interactive product tours and smart tips into your application, improving user adoption and conversions instantly.

Read more about Usetiful

No description of CrossBrowserTesting yet.

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Usetiful 12 features
CrossBrowserTesting 7 features
  • Product Tours
    interactive guided tours
  • Checklists
    user onboarding checklists
  • Hotspot beacons
    pulsating elements to draw user's attention without being intrusive
  • Microsurveys
    gather user feedback seamlessly
  • Smart Tips
    contextual guidance and validation
  • Assistant widget
    customer self help
  • Easy to Set-up and use
    less than 5 min setup
  • Employee onboarding
    employee tutorials and checklist
  • Knowledge Base portal
    public self-help portal
  • Native mobile guides
    support for native mobile
  • Feature tracking
    tracking of feature adoption by user segments or individual users
  • Integrations
    connect onboarding flows to wider company operations
  • Wide Range of Browsers and Devices
    CrossBrowserTesting offers a large selection of browsers and devices, allowing developers to test their applications in various environments to ensure compatibility.
  • Live Testing
    Users can perform live interactive testing on real devices, enabling them to manually verify the behavior of their application and catch issues that automated tests might miss.
  • Automated Testing Integration
    The platform provides integration with popular testing frameworks and tools such as Selenium, Appium, and others, facilitating automated testing workflows.
  • Visual Testing
    CrossBrowserTesting offers visual testing capabilities, allowing users to compare screenshots from different browsers to identify design inconsistencies.
  • Comprehensive Reports
    Detailed test reports with screenshots and logs are generated, helping users to quickly identify and address issues found during testing.
  • Parallel Testing
    The service supports parallel testing, enabling users to run multiple tests simultaneously, significantly reducing the overall testing time.
  • Easy-to-Use Interface
    The user interface is intuitive and user-friendly, making it easy for both beginners and experienced testers to navigate and utilize the platform effectively.

Possible disadvantages

  • Cost
    CrossBrowserTesting can be expensive, especially for small teams or individual developers who might find the subscription plans to be cost-prohibitive.
  • Performance
    Tests on real devices can sometimes be slow due to the availability and network constraints, which can affect the overall efficiency of the testing process.
  • Limited Mobile Devices
    While the platform includes a variety of devices, the selection might not cover all the latest models or less common devices, potentially limiting testing coverage.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    Some advanced features and integrations might require a learning curve, which could be challenging for users who are not familiar with automated testing or the specific tools supported.
  • Test Timeout Issues
    Occasional issues with test timeouts have been reported, which can disrupt the testing process and require reruns or additional troubleshooting.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Usetiful
CrossBrowserTesting

Overall verdict

  • Usetiful is considered a good solution for businesses looking to optimize user onboarding and enhance the customer experience. Its features cater well to both small startups and larger organizations needing to provide seamless user guidance.

Why this product is good

  • Usetiful is a digital adoption platform designed to help users onboard, train, and guide through applications with ease. It is known for its intuitive interface, customizable onboarding flows, and interactive product tours. This tool can enhance user engagement, reduce churn, and improve the learning curve for new software users.

Recommended for

    Usetiful is recommended for product managers, customer success teams, and training departments in companies that deploy software applications and seek to improve user onboarding, reduce support requests, or boost user satisfaction and retention.

Overall verdict

  • CrossBrowserTesting is generally regarded as a good solution for cross-browser testing needs, particularly for teams that require real-time testing and robust automation capabilities. Its ease of use, extensive browser/device coverage, and integration options make it a strong choice for many development and QA teams.

Why this product is good

  • CrossBrowserTesting is considered a valuable tool because it provides a cloud-based platform for testing websites and mobile applications across different browsers, devices, and operating systems. It enables developers and QA teams to ensure that their applications function correctly on various platforms without needing to maintain a complex setup of physical devices. The platform offers real-time debugging, automated screenshot testing, and integration with various CI/CD tools, which streamlines the testing process.

Recommended for

    This service is highly recommended for software development teams, QA engineers, and web developers who need to ensure compatibility and functionality of their web applications across multiple browsers and devices. It is particularly useful for organizations with a focus on maintaining high-quality user experiences across various platforms.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Usetiful 5 videos + Add
CrossBrowserTesting 1 video + Add

Embedded Banners

More videos

  • - Create product tours without coding with Usetiful
  • - User Onboarding Checklists by Usetiful
  • - Usetiful - Visual Editor Demo
  • - Usetiful Introduction Video

Cross Browser Testing Tool Comparison – LambdaTest vs. CrossBrowserTesting

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Usetiful
CrossBrowserTesting
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing Usetiful and CrossBrowserTesting.

What makes your product unique?

Usetiful's answer

  • Usetiful works with native mobile - serving clients on all of their platforms
  • Usetiful is affordable - offering a free-forever plan and scalable business offerings
  • Usetiful "just works" - supporting wide range of corner cases, including exotic Single Page Applications or iFrames
  • Usetiful is secure - not only ISO27001 certified, HIPAA and GDPR compliant. But also able to run on-premise for security-intense clients

Who are some of the biggest customers of your product?

Usetiful's answer

-Audi -DHL -DPD -Konica Minolta -Foodora -e27 -Nanyang Technological University -iChef

User comments

Share your experience with using Usetiful and CrossBrowserTesting. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Usetiful 4.5 · 2 reviews
CrossBrowserTesting no reviews yet

View more

We have no reviews of CrossBrowserTesting yet. Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Usetiful 0 mentions
CrossBrowserTesting 6 mentions

Tracking Usetiful since Mar 2021.

  • How can I test my site on safari if I don't have a Mac ?
    Yeah I moved on pretty quick from browserstack, but it seems to be the most popular. I've tried crossbrowsertesting.com but at the moment I really like app.lambdatest.com. Source: almost 4 years ago
  • great list of "cool" sites from hnews
    Https://geizhals.de/ - this is a german site but the UI is nice and you can find a lot of stuff. Https://www.gsmarena.com/search.php3? - a phone search site. When I was at https://crossbrowsertesting.com we used this site a... - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago
  • Learn How To Create, Test and Deploy a Single Page App with Vue 3 + Vite and Pinia
    Fortunately we don’t need to install, nor configure, any other tools, unless maybe some fancy reporters, but for now we can get everything we need in terms of end-to-end automated testing out of Nightwatch. Besides Chrome, Nightwatch has... - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago

View more

Alternatives to Usetiful and CrossBrowserTesting

When comparing Usetiful and CrossBrowserTesting, you can also consider the following products.