TrafficMonitor VS Smart HTTPS

• Open Source
  Since TrafficMonitor is hosted on GitHub, its source code is available to the public, allowing for community audits, transparency, and contributions.
• Lightweight
  The application is designed to be lightweight, consuming minimal system resources while monitoring network activity.
• Customizable Interface
  Users can personalize the appearance and data display according to their preferences, enhancing the user experience.
• Portable
  The software is portable, meaning it can be run without installation, making it convenient for use on multiple systems.
• Multi-language Support
  TrafficMonitor supports multiple languages, making it accessible to a broader audience globally.

Possible disadvantages

• Windows Only
  TrafficMonitor is only available for the Windows operating system, limiting its usability for macOS and Linux users.
• Manual Updates
  Users may need to manually check for and download updates from the GitHub repository, which can be less convenient compared to automatic updates.
• User Support
  Being a community-driven open-source project, professional customer support is not available; users rely on community forums and documentation for help.
• Basic Features
  While it covers essential functions, TrafficMonitor may lack some advanced features found in more comprehensive paid network monitoring solutions.
• Security Concerns
  As with any open-source software, users need to be cautious about the potential for security vulnerabilities introduced by third-party contributions.

• Automatic Redirection to HTTPS
  Smart HTTPS automatically changes HTTP protocol to HTTPS, which enhances the security of your browsing by ensuring that the connection is encrypted.
• Fallback to HTTP
  In cases where an HTTPS version of the site is not available, it can automatically revert back to HTTP, ensuring you can still access the website instead of facing a disruption.
• Whitelist Feature
  Allows users to maintain a whitelist of websites that should always be accessed using HTTP, providing flexibility and control over the browsing experience.
• Improved Privacy
  By automatically using HTTPS, it helps in protecting user data from eavesdroppers and enhances privacy while browsing the web.

Possible disadvantages

• Compatibility Issues
  Some websites may not function correctly over HTTPS, leading to potential misbehavior or broken features when accessed using Smart HTTPS.
• Potential for Increased Loading Times
  Sometimes, redirecting to HTTPS can result in slightly longer loading times, especially if the server's configuration is not optimal for HTTPS.
• Resource Intensive
  The addon might consume additional resources to check for HTTPS versions of every site, which could impact browser performance, especially on older systems.
• Limited Control Over Redirection
  Users might have limited ability to control which sites are redirected to HTTPS if they haven't preemptively whitelisted specific HTTP sites.

No analysis of Smart HTTPS yet.

Tracking TrafficMonitor since Mar 2021.

• “We don’t track you … except for when we get paid for it.”

  Smart HTTPS, site This tries to send you to https sites instead of http sites. Using http sites makes you venerable to man in the middle attacks. (dont use http on public wifis if possible). Source: over 4 years ago

• question about non secure websites

  I'd recommend using Smart HTTPS which automatically makes your site's HTTPS if it can offer it so it will reduce these situations. Here's the site where you can choose whichever browser you use. https://mybrowseraddon.com/smart-https.html. Source: over 4 years ago