Software Alternatives & Startups

FreeMeter VS Smart HTTPS

Compare FreeMeter VS Smart HTTPS and see what are their differences

FreeMeter

Monitor network bandwidth (C#.NET 2k/XP+). Desktop and Systray graph.

Rating
0 reviews
Smart HTTPS

Automatically changes HTTP addresses to the secure HTTPS, and if loading encounters error, reverts...

Rating
0 reviews
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Smart HTTPS seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 2 times since March 2021.

social mentions
0 vs 2
Monitoring Tools popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
53 vs 15

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

FreeMeter
Smart HTTPS
Website miechu.pl mybrowseraddon.com
Company Startup from Poland
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

FreeMeter 4 features
Smart HTTPS 4 features
  • Lightweight
    FreeMeter is a lightweight application, which means it does not consume significant system resources, making it suitable for older systems or those with limited resources.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The application has a simple and intuitive interface, which makes it easy for users to monitor their system resources without needing extensive technical knowledge.
  • Real-time Monitoring
    FreeMeter provides real-time monitoring of system resources, allowing users to keep track of various metrics such as CPU usage, memory usage, and network activity.
  • Customizable Alerts
    The software allows users to set customizable alerts for different metrics, helping them to take timely actions when resource usage exceeds specified thresholds.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited Feature Set
    FreeMeter lacks some of the more advanced features found in other monitoring tools, which may not satisfy users looking for in-depth analysis or comprehensive system management.
  • Windows Only
    The application is designed to run only on Windows systems, limiting its usability for users who operate on other operating systems like macOS or Linux.
  • Outdated Design
    The application interface may appear outdated, which might not be appealing to users who prefer modern design aesthetics.
  • No Active Development
    There is little evidence of active development or regular updates, which could lead to potential security vulnerabilities or compatibility issues with new Windows versions.
  • Automatic Redirection to HTTPS
    Smart HTTPS automatically changes HTTP protocol to HTTPS, which enhances the security of your browsing by ensuring that the connection is encrypted.
  • Fallback to HTTP
    In cases where an HTTPS version of the site is not available, it can automatically revert back to HTTP, ensuring you can still access the website instead of facing a disruption.
  • Whitelist Feature
    Allows users to maintain a whitelist of websites that should always be accessed using HTTP, providing flexibility and control over the browsing experience.
  • Improved Privacy
    By automatically using HTTPS, it helps in protecting user data from eavesdroppers and enhances privacy while browsing the web.

Possible disadvantages

  • Compatibility Issues
    Some websites may not function correctly over HTTPS, leading to potential misbehavior or broken features when accessed using Smart HTTPS.
  • Potential for Increased Loading Times
    Sometimes, redirecting to HTTPS can result in slightly longer loading times, especially if the server's configuration is not optimal for HTTPS.
  • Resource Intensive
    The addon might consume additional resources to check for HTTPS versions of every site, which could impact browser performance, especially on older systems.
  • Limited Control Over Redirection
    Users might have limited ability to control which sites are redirected to HTTPS if they haven't preemptively whitelisted specific HTTP sites.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
FreeMeter
Smart HTTPS
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
58% 58%
42% 42%

User comments

Share your experience with using FreeMeter and Smart HTTPS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

FreeMeter 0 mentions
Smart HTTPS 2 mentions

Tracking FreeMeter since Mar 2021.

  • “We don’t track you … except for when we get paid for it.”
    Smart HTTPS, site This tries to send you to https sites instead of http sites. Using http sites makes you venerable to man in the middle attacks. (dont use http on public wifis if possible). Source: over 4 years ago
  • question about non secure websites
    I'd recommend using Smart HTTPS which automatically makes your site's HTTPS if it can offer it so it will reduce these situations. Here's the site where you can choose whichever browser you use. https://mybrowseraddon.com/smart-https.html. Source: over 4 years ago

Alternatives to FreeMeter and Smart HTTPS

When comparing FreeMeter and Smart HTTPS, you can also consider the following products.