Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Traefik VS Apache

Compare Traefik VS Apache and see what are their differences

Traefik logo Traefik

Load Balancer / Reverse Proxy

Apache logo Apache

Home page of The Apache Software Foundation
  • Traefik Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-13
  • Apache Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-04

Traefik features and specs

  • Dynamic Configuration
    Traefik allows for dynamic configuration changes without needing restarts, making it easy to manage in rapidly evolving environments.
  • Kubernetes Integration
    Traefik has native support for Kubernetes, simplifying the process of managing ingress controllers and load balancing in containerized environments.
  • Service Discovery
    It supports automatic service discovery via various backends, including Docker, Consul, and Kubernetes, making it easy to integrate into many architectures.
  • HTTPS Support
    Traefik can automatically obtain and renew SSL/TLS certificates using Let's Encrypt, ensuring secure communications.
  • Middleware
    It supports middleware for handling tasks such as authentication, rate limiting, and retries, offering more control over traffic management.
  • Dashboard
    Traefik includes a built-in dashboard for monitoring and visualizing the routing configuration and health of services.

Possible disadvantages of Traefik

  • Complexity
    The flexibility and range of features can make Traefik complex to configure and understand for beginners.
  • Performance Overhead
    The additional abstraction layer can introduce some performance overhead, which might be a concern in high-performance environments.
  • Limited Advanced Features
    Although Traefik covers many standard use cases, it may lack some advanced features that are found in more specialized load balancers.
  • Documentation
    While improving, the documentation can sometimes be lacking in depth or clarity, which can lead to difficulties in configuration and troubleshooting.
  • Community Support
    Although there is an active community, it may not be as vast or responsive as that of some other more established software like NGINX or HAProxy.
  • Proprietary Features
    Some advanced features are only available in the enterprise edition, which might be a constraint for users looking for a completely open-source solution.

Apache features and specs

  • Open Source
    Apache HTTP Server is an open-source software, so it is free to use, modify, and distribute according to the terms of the Apache License. This provides flexibility and cost savings for developers and organizations.
  • Community Support
    There is a large community of developers and users who contribute to Apache HTTP Server, providing extensive documentation, forums, and support. This makes troubleshooting and finding resources easier.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    Apache HTTP Server is compatible with a wide range of operating systems, including UNIX, Linux, MacOS, and Windows, allowing for flexibility in deployment environments.
  • Highly Configurable
    Apache is highly configurable through its numerous modules which can be used to extend its capabilities and customize its behavior to meet specific needs.
  • Proven Stability and Security
    Apache has been around for a long time and is known for its stability and reliability. Regular security updates and patches help maintain its robust security posture.

Possible disadvantages of Apache

  • Resource Intensive
    Apache can be more resource-intensive than other lightweight web servers, potentially leading to higher memory and CPU usage on large-scale deployments.
  • Complex Configuration
    The configuration of Apache can be complex, requiring significant expertise to optimize performance and ensure security in more comprehensive deployment scenarios.
  • Performance
    In some situations, especially with static content, Apache can be outperformed by newer web servers like Nginx, which may offer better speed and efficiency under high loads.
  • Thread-Based Architecture
    Apache’s thread-based architecture can be less efficient in handling a large number of concurrent connections compared to event-driven architectures.

Traefik videos

Traefik: A Scalable and Highly Available Edge Router by Damien Duportalt

More videos:

  • Review - Playing around with Traefik
  • Review - Rocket.Chat on Amazon EKS with Traefik. By Aaron Ogle, Lead Cloud Architect

Apache videos

2021 TVS Apache RTR 160 Complete & Honest Review with new price update | Pearl White Apache 160 ⚡⚡⚡

More videos:

  • Review - 2020 New TVS Apache RTR 160 4V (BS6) Detailed Review | New Changes | Walkaround | Price | Features⚡⚡
  • Review - TVS Apache 160 2v BS6 Review - High On Price !!!
  • Review - TVS Apache RTR 310 Realtime Review after Testing - Things to know |Who can buy?
  • Review - Experience the FIREPOWER of the AH-64 Apache!
  • Review - Yamaha MT-15 V2 vs TVS Apache RTR 200 4V Comparison Review: The Best Beginner Sporty Street Bike

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Traefik and Apache)
Web Servers
91 91%
9% 9
Web And Application Servers
Load Balancer / Reverse Proxy
Application Server
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Traefik and Apache. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Traefik and Apache

Traefik Reviews

Top 5 Open Source Load Balancers in 2024
Traefik's prowess extends beyond the conventional, equipped with a robust set of middlewares that elevate its capabilities. Going beyond load balancing and reverse proxy roles, Traefik serves as a comprehensive solution for modern cloud-native applications, including API gateway, orchestrator ingress, east-west service communication, and more.
10 Awesome Open Source Load Balancers
Traefik is a reverse proxy and L7 load balancer. Written in Go, it’s designed to support microservices and container-powered services in a distributed system. It has native support for Docker Swarm and Kubernetes orchestration, as well as service registries such as etcd or Consul. It also offers extensive support for WebSocket, HTTP/2, and gRPC services. Traefik integrates...
Top 5 Open-Source Load Balancers 2021
The modern and efficient, Traefik is an open-source reverse proxy and load balancer that provides a simple routing platform without engaging any complexities. Most popular among the Github Fanclub, Traefik owns approximately 27.7k Github stars.
Source: linuxways.net
The 5 Best Open Source Load Balancers
Traefik bills itself as the “cloud native edge router.” It’s a modern microservices-focused application load balancer and reverse proxy written in Golang. With its emphasis on support for several modern container orchestration platforms, batteries-included logging, and several popular metric formats, Traefik is a top choice for container-based microservices architectures.
Source: logz.io

Apache Reviews

Apache, IIS, NGINX, GWS : What’s Your Choice?
Utilizing a specific type of virtual or physical server determines the type of web server software you use. If you prefer Microsoft, then you will prefer to use IIS (Internet Information Services / Server) by Microsoft as your primary web server application solution. If you use Linux distribution, you have other alternatives like Apache, NGINX and LiteSpeed.
Source: www.milesweb.in
FOSS | Top 15 Web Servers 2021
According to W3Techs, the most popular web server is the Apache HTTP Server, which is used by 34.1% of websites as of March 2021. The BuiltWith Internet services corporation has 62,624,313 live websites that use Apache. ZenTao uses Apache to start its server for ALM project management tool users.
Source: www.zentao.pm
What Is the Most Popular Web Server Application in 2021?
Despite being bundled with most modern Microsoft software, IIS loses out to Apache on its own devices. The main selling point here is performance. While IIS has kept up with Apache in recent times, Apache has historically been performing much better, which still gives it an edge over IIS.
Top Linux Web Servers: Pros and Cons
Now that we know their advantages and disadvantages, which web server is the best? The answer depends on your use case. Nginx is a very fast and powerful option, Apache is a great general-purpose web server, while LiteSpeed represents a premium alternative. Caddy works great if you need simplicity, while Lighthttpd works best when resources are low.
Source: bigstep.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Traefik should be more popular than Apache. It has been mentiond 38 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Traefik mentions (38)

  • Adventures in Homelabbing: From Cloud Obsession to Self-Hosted Shenanigans
    I began to self-host a Minecraft server using Crafty Controller, an Excalidraw instance, Docmost to replace Notion, Plane to replace Jira, and Penpot to replace Figma. To be able to access them from the internet, I used Nginx Proxy Manager to set up reverse proxies with SSL. You can use Traefik or Caddy instead, but I enjoyed the ease-of-use of NPM. For a dashboard solution, I started with Homarr, but later... - Source: dev.to / 26 days ago
  • Nginx vs Traefik: Which Reverse Proxy is Right for You?
    Before diving into the specifics of Nginx and Traefik, let’s quickly define what a reverse proxy is. A reverse proxy sits between the client (browser or other services) and your backend services (web servers or applications). It handles incoming requests, routes them to the appropriate backend service, and forwards the response to the client. Reverse proxies are typically used for:. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Opening Pandora's Container - How Exposing the Docker Socket Paves the Way to Host Control (Part 1)
    You may wonder why one would even want to expose the Docker socket when there are clearly risks involved. A popular usecase besides accessing remote Docker daemons (which you can actually expose over a TCP socket) are applications that either need control of the daemon to manage other containers, like for example Portainer, or tools that need information about containers for auto discovery purposes, like Traefik.... - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • The Home Server Journey - 3: An Actually Global "Hello"
    I emphasize usually because K3s is different and comes with a Traefik-based ingress controller by default. Taking that into account, as much as I like NGINX outside the container's world, I'd rather keep things simple and use what's already in place. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • Running Docker based web applications in Hashicorp Nomad with Traefik Load balancing
    In previous post, we discussed creating a basic Nomad cluster in the Vultr cloud. Here, we will use the cluster created to deploy a load-balanced sample web app using the service discovery capability of Nomad and its native integration with the Traefik load balancer. The source code is available here for the reference. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
View more

Apache mentions (23)

  • Navigating the Future: Sustainable Funding for Open Source
    Non-Profit Foundations: Foundations like the Apache Software Foundation and the Linux Foundation pool resources to support critical open source projects. These organizations ensure the proper allocation of funds and provide necessary infrastructure and governance. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Install Apache on Windows in a Few Simple Steps
    The Apache Software Foundation offers open source software used around the world, with over 8,400 committers contributing to more than 320 active projects [https://apache.org/]. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • Shades of Open Source - Understanding The Many Meanings of "Open"
    It's this kind of certainty that underscores the vital role of the Apache Software Foundation (ASF). Many first encounter Apache through its pioneering project, the open-source web server framework that remains ubiquitous in web operations today. The ASF was initially created to hold the intellectual property and assets of the Apache project, and it has since evolved into a cornerstone for open-source projects... - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
  • Why Do I Love Open Source?
    Back in 2015, Java was owned by Sun Microsystems (now part of Oracle) and along with MySQL had a thriving open-source community and ecosystem. A lot of this was under the Apache and Eclipse Foundations. I fondly remember projects such as Tomcat, BERT, the Eclipse IDE, Maven, and so forth. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Tarsnap has given 2^18 dollars to open source
    That might be an issue for smaller projects but at larger scales there is often an associated charity. For example https://apache.org/ and https://numfocus.org/community/mission are both 501(c)(3) registered charitable organizations. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Traefik and Apache, you can also consider the following products

nginx - A high performance free open source web server powering busiest sites on the Internet.

AWS Elastic Load Balancing - Amazon ELB automatically distributes incoming application traffic across multiple Amazon EC2 instances in the cloud.

LiteSpeed Web Server - LiteSpeed Web Server (LSWS) is a high-performance Apache drop-in replacement.

Haproxy - Reliable, High Performance TCP/HTTP Load Balancer

lighttpd - A secure, fast, compliant, and very flexible web-server that has been optimized for high-performance environments

Google Cloud Load Balancing - Google Cloud Load Balancer enables users to scale their applications on Google Compute Engine.