Software Alternatives & Startups

TradingView VS QuickJS

Compare TradingView VS QuickJS and see what are their differences

TradingView

The best charting tool for crypto and stocks

Rating
5.0 · 4 reviews
QuickJS

Application and Data, Build, Test, Deploy, and JavaScript Compilers

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, TradingView should be more popular than QuickJS. It has been mentioned 258 times since March 2021.

social mentions
258 vs 46
Finance popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
240+ vs 44

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

TradingView
QuickJS
Website tradingview.com bellard.org
Pricing
Open source
Company Startup from the United Kingdom · 100 - 249 employees
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

TradingView 6 features
QuickJS 6 features
  • User-friendly Interface
    TradingView offers a clean and intuitive interface that is easy for both beginners and experienced traders to navigate.
  • Comprehensive Charting Tools
    The platform provides a wide range of charting tools, including indicators, drawing tools, and customizable chart types to conduct in-depth technical analysis.
  • Cloud-based Platform
    Being cloud-based, TradingView allows users to access their charts and settings from any device with internet access, ensuring flexibility and convenience.
  • Social Community
    TradingView has a strong community aspect where users can share ideas, analysis, and strategies, fostering a collaborative environment.
  • Data Coverage
    The platform supports data from a variety of global markets, including stocks, forex, cryptocurrencies, and commodities, providing broad market coverage.
  • Pine Script
    TradingView offers its own scripting language, Pine Script, which allows users to create custom indicators and strategies.

Possible disadvantages

  • Subscription Cost
    While TradingView offers a free tier, advanced features and additional data require a subscription that may be costly for some users.
  • Limited Broker Integration
    The number of brokers integrated with TradingView for direct trading is limited, which may be a drawback for users whose preferred brokers are not supported.
  • Data Delays
    Free tier users may experience delays in data feeds, which can be critical during fast market movements.
  • Customization Restrictions
    Some advanced customization options for charts and tools are restricted to higher subscription levels.
  • Learning Curve for Pine Script
    Although powerful, Pine Script has a learning curve, which may be challenging for users who are not familiar with coding.
  • Lightweight
    QuickJS is designed to be lightweight with a small footprint, making it easy to embed in applications and suitable for resource-constrained environments.
  • Fast Startup Time
    QuickJS offers very fast startup times, which can be beneficial for applications that require quick script execution without a long initialization period.
  • Full ES2020 Support
    QuickJS supports the full ES2020 specification, providing modern JavaScript features and syntax, which is advantageous for developers who want to use the latest JavaScript features.
  • Embeddability
    Being easy to integrate into other applications or systems, QuickJS provides a simple C API, which facilitates embedding it in various software and platforms.
  • Single File Distribution
    QuickJS can be distributed as a single file, simplifying packaging and distribution without needing external dependencies.
  • Memory Efficiency
    Its memory efficient design allows QuickJS to run scripts in environments with limited memory resources, making it suitable for IoT devices and embedded systems.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited Ecosystem
    QuickJS, being a relatively new and niche project, has a smaller ecosystem compared to more established JavaScript engines like V8, which means fewer libraries and community resources are available.
  • Performance
    While QuickJS is efficient, it may not deliver the same high-performance execution as more mature engines like V8, especially in applications requiring intensive computational processing.
  • Lack of Long-term Support
    QuickJS may not have the same level of long-term support and ongoing development as larger projects maintained by large companies or communities.
  • Single-threaded
    QuickJS runs in a single thread, which can be a limitation for applications that require multithreading support for parallel processing.
  • Limited Debugging Tools
    Compared to more popular JavaScript engines, QuickJS has fewer debugging tools and integrations, which might make development and troubleshooting more challenging.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

TradingView 3 videos + Add
QuickJS 1 video + Add

TRADINGVIEW REVIEW

More videos

  • - Why I Switched From MetaTrader to TradingView - TradingView Review
  • - My Trading Set-up | Thinkorswim and Tradingview

QuickJS - IO, axios, redaxios, fetch

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
TradingView
QuickJS
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using TradingView and QuickJS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

TradingView 5.0 · 4 reviews
QuickJS no reviews yet

View more

We have no reviews of QuickJS yet. Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

TradingView 258 mentions
QuickJS 46 mentions
  • Going from paper trading to real money. Best way to go about this?
    What is my best option here to move forward and play with $10 on tradingview.com. Source: about 3 years ago
  • Daily Discussion Thread | July 11
    Maybe get on tradingview.com? Thats my favorite charting system outside of TOS. Its limited in the free version though. Source: about 3 years ago
  • Big news for our BTC loyalists 📈
    According to data from TradingView.com, BTC has officially reached 50% market dominance for the first time in 2 years. Source: about 3 years ago

View more

  • Vim 9.2 Released
    You don't need V8 for running JS for scripting, you have quickjs[1] or mquickjs[2] for example. You might have problems importing npm packages, but as we can see from lua plugins you don't even need support for package managers.... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • Fabrice Bellard Releases MicroQuickJS
    - QuickJS: https://bellard.org/quickjs/ Legendary. - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
  • Building a JavaScript Runtime from Scratch using C
    For those who would like a true "from scratch" implementation of JavaScript, Fabrice Bellard's QuickJS [1] is clean, readable and approachable. It's a full implementation of modern JavaScript in a straightforward project, not nearly as... - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago

View more

Alternatives to TradingView and QuickJS

When comparing TradingView and QuickJS, you can also consider the following products.