Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Trac VS Apache Subversion

Compare Trac VS Apache Subversion and see what are their differences

Sugarbug
Connect your tools into a living knowledge graph. Sugarbug captures every signal to deliver compounding insights and unified context. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. ยป Base Details
  2. ยป Videos
  3. ยป Reviews
  4. ยป Alternatives

Trac logo Trac

Trac is a project management and bug/issue tracking system. Provides an interface to Subversion and an integrated wiki.

Apache Subversion logo Apache Subversion

Mirror of Apache Subversion. Contribute to apache/subversion development by creating an account on GitHub.
  • Trac Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-09
  • Apache Subversion Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-27

Trac features and specs

  • Integrated Wiki
    Trac includes a built-in wiki which allows for seamless documentation and collaborative editing. This feature helps keep all project-related information in one place, enhancing accessibility and coordination.
  • Issue Tracking
    Trac offers robust issue tracking capabilities. Users can create, update, and manage tickets, providing a streamlined way to manage tasks, bugs, and improvements.
  • Subversion Integration
    Trac has native support for Subversion (SVN), making it easy to integrate version control with project management. This feature simplifies change tracking and ensures that all code modifications are documented.
  • Customizable Reports
    The tool allows for the generation of customizable reports based on ticket data. This enables teams to extract valuable insights and measure project performance effectively.
  • Plugins and Extensions
    Trac is highly extensible, with a range of available plugins to add or enhance functionality. This extensibility makes it adaptable to various project needs and workflows.
  • Open Source
    Being an open-source tool, Trac is free to use and modify. This provides flexibility and cost savings, especially for small to medium-sized teams and organizations.

Possible disadvantages of Trac

  • Outdated User Interface
    Trac's user interface is considered dated by modern standards, which can result in a less appealing and less intuitive user experience. This may discourage new users or make onboarding more challenging.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    New users may find Trac complex to set up and use, particularly if they are not familiar with version control systems like Subversion. This can lead to an initial investment in training and time.
  • Limited Native Integrations
    Trac has limited out-of-the-box integrations with other popular tools and services commonly used in modern development pipelines, such as GitHub, Jenkins, or Slack. This requires additional configuration or plugin installations.
  • Performance Issues
    For larger projects with extensive data and a high number of tickets, Trac can experience performance bottlenecks, leading to slower response times and decreased efficiency.
  • Sparse Documentation
    Although Trac includes a built-in wiki for user documentation, the official documentation is often considered sparse or outdated, making it difficult for users to find solutions or best practices.

Apache Subversion features and specs

  • Centralized Version Control
    Apache Subversion (SVN) uses a centralized repository model, which makes it easy to manage and control all project files in one place. All history and versions are stored on the server, making backup and repository management straightforward.
  • Atomic Commits
    Subversion ensures that commits are atomic operations. This means that either all changes in a commit are applied, or none are, helping to maintain the integrity of the repository.
  • Comprehensive Authorization
    SVN offers fine-grained authentication and authorization models. It can integrate with various authentication systems and allows granular access control on a per-directory and per-user basis.
  • Binary File Handling
    SVN handles binary files more efficiently compared to some other version control systems, reducing the size of repositories and improving performance when large files are committed.
  • Mature and Stable
    SVN has been around since 2000 and is widely used in enterprise settings. It is stable, well-documented, and has a vast community for support.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Subversion

  • Limited Branching and Merging
    SVNโ€™s branching and merging capabilities are more cumbersome compared to distributed version control systems (DVCS) like Git. Merging in SVN can be complex and time-consuming.
  • Single Point of Failure
    As a centralized version control system, the SVN repository server becomes a single point of failure. If the server goes down, no commits can be made until it is back up.
  • Performance Overhead
    Working with a remote central repository can introduce latency and performance overhead, especially with large projects and many users.
  • Less support for Offline Work
    SVN generally requires network access to the central repository for most operations. This makes it less flexible for developers needing to work offline, compared to DVCS where local copies are complete repositories.
  • Complex Repository Management
    Managing SVN repositories, particularly for large projects, can become complex and may require significant administrative effort to handle repositories, backups, and access controls.

Analysis of Trac

Overall verdict

  • Trac is a good choice for teams looking for a simple and effective system for managing software development projects, particularly those using Subversion or needing a highly customizable solution that can be extended through plugins.

Why this product is good

  • Trac is a widely-used open-source project management and issue tracking tool. It is particularly popular due to its integration with Subversion, though it also supports other SCMs, and its lightweight nature compared to other full-fledged project management tools. It allows for customizable workflows, wiki documentation, and ticket management, making it suitable for small to medium-sized projects. The simplicity and extendibility through plugins make it an attractive choice for development teams familiar with Python and those who prefer a minimalistic approach.

Recommended for

  • Software development teams using Subversion or other SCMs looking for a lightweight issue tracker and project management tool.
  • Teams that need customizable workflows for tracking issues, features, and project progress.
  • Organizations preferring open-source solutions with a strong community and plugin support.
  • Businesses looking for an integrated wiki, roadmap, and milestone tracking to assist with project documentation and planning.

Analysis of Apache Subversion

Overall verdict

  • Apache Subversion is a solid choice for projects that require a centralized version control system with robust access controls and support for large file handling. While it may not offer the distributed features and branching flexibility of systems like Git, it remains a reliable and efficient tool for many development environments.

Why this product is good

  • Apache Subversion (SVN) is a centralized version control system that provides a simple model for versioning, which can be easier to understand for users who prefer a linear, sequential history of changes. It ensures a single source of truth and is well-suited for teams that require tight access control over the repository. SVN is also known for handling large files and binary files better than some distributed systems.

Recommended for

  • Organizations with strict version control policies
  • Teams that need centralized control over versioning
  • Projects with large binary files that need versioning
  • Users who are more comfortable with a sequential workflow

Trac videos

+ Add

2008 Ford Explorer SportTrac Review - Kelley Blue Book

More videos:

  • Review - A Review of the 2005 Ford Explorer Sport Trac, Why I Like It, and Why It Will Be a Collectible
  • Review - FORD SPORT TRAC REVIEW (WELCOME TO THE SPORT TRAC FAMILY) PROS AND CONS, COMMON ISSUES TO LOOK FOR

Apache Subversion videos

+ Add

Setting Up Apache Subversion on Windows

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Trac and Apache Subversion)

Trac

Apache Subversion

Project Management
100 100%
Project Management
0% 0
Git
0 0%
Git
100% 100
Task Management
100 100%
Task Management
0% 0
Code Collaboration
0 0%
Code Collaboration
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Trac and Apache Subversion. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Trac seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 16 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Trac mentions (16)

  • Right to be Forgotten and Open Source
    So next up is the issue tracker. Previously we were using Edgewall Trac for issues and documentation via it's WIKI functionality. We made this read-only years ago because it is abandon-ware now and wasn't scaling to the needs of the project. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • What is the name of the function? I know it does exist... but do not know where to look for...
    For instance, when I enter Trac-2345, logseq knows that it must be replaced by a link to the ticket number 2345 in my Trac ticket system. Source: about 3 years ago
  • Building GitHub with Ruby and Rails | The GitHub Blog
    Before there was Github, I used this software called Trac since it worked with subversion. It was so cool to be able to view source code and commits on the web. Then around 2007 or so I started using git and then in 2009 I created a Github account...so proud of Github and Rails. Thanks for the writeup! Source: about 3 years ago
  • Good free knowledge base software for internal IT documentation
    If you want more functionality, such as a ticketing system and the ability to manage source code repos, look at Redmine (https://www.redmine.org/) which also has a wiki feature. Trac is older but also has a wiki (https://trac.edgewall.org/). Source: over 3 years ago
  • Selfhosted support ticket system
    Try Trac, I've used it before without issues. Source: over 3 years ago
View more

Apache Subversion mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Apache Subversion yet. Tracking of Apache Subversion recommendations started around May 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Trac and Apache Subversion, you can also consider the following products

Redmine - Flexible project management web application

Git - Git is a free and open source version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. It is easy to learn and lightweight with lighting fast performance that outclasses competitors.

Jira - The #1 software development tool used by agile teams. Jira Software is built for every member of your software team to plan, track, and release great software.

Mercurial SCM - Mercurial is a free, distributed source control management tool.

Trello - Infinitely flexible. Incredibly easy to use. Great mobile apps. It's free. Trello keeps track of everything, from the big picture to the minute details.

Atlassian Bitbucket Server - Atlassian Bitbucket Server is a scalable collaborative Git solution.

Loading...