
CodeAnt AI
CodeRabbit
DeepSource
GitLab Duo
qodo.ai
CodeReviewBot AI
CodeReviewr
AI-Powered Code Reviews for GitLab, GitHub & Azure DevOps&Bitbucket - Instant Analysis, Security Detection & Conversational Copilot& Review agents. Zero Setup Required. Open Source.
Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Scratch seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 579 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | thinkreview.dev | scratch.mit.edu |
| Pricing | ||
| Platforms | — | |
| Company | Startup from the United Kingdom · 1 - 9 employees · 2025 | 2007 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


ThinkReview is a browser extension for AI-assisted code reviews on GitHub, GitLab, Azure DevOps, and Bitbucket. It combines fast review summaries, security and best-practice findings, and structured code suggestions with a practical reviewer workflow: reviewers keep control, can copy/edit...
No description of Scratch yet.
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing ThinkReview and Scratch.
ThinkReview's answer
Its biggest differentiator is the zero-configuration setup. Unlike many competitors, ThinkReview works instantly as a browser extension without needing complex CI/CD integration, setup tokens, or granting access to your entire GitLab/GitHub project. It enhances the developer's existing workflow directly in the browser.
ThinkReview's answer
You should choose ThinkReview for its simplicity and speed. It's the fastest way to start with AI code reviews—install the extension, and you're done. It empowers individual developers to improve their reviews immediately, without the overhead and enterprise-level pricing of deeply integrated tools.
ThinkReview's answer
Our primary audience consists of individual developers and small to medium-sized teams using GitLab. It's perfect for developers and team leads who want to improve code quality and efficiency without a complex, top-down implementation process.
ThinkReview's answer
The story is simple: it was born from the founder's frustration with code reviews being a slow, repetitive bottleneck. The goal was to create a tool that was easy to install, worked out of the box, and acted as a true AI copilot to assist the human reviewer, not just an automated bot.
ThinkReview's answer
The core of the product is a browser extension built with JavaScript, HTML, and CSS. It communicates securely with major AI and Large Language Model (LLM) APIs to provide its intelligent feedback.
ThinkReview's answer
As a recently launched tool, our primary user base consists of individual developers and growing teams who have adopted ThinkReview to streamline their personal and team workflows. We are focused on building this grassroots support before targeting large enterprise customers.
Share your experience with using ThinkReview and Scratch. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.


We have no reviews of ThinkReview yet. Be the first one to post
Scratch lets students create interactive stories, games, and animations. The coding projects allow students to experiment and express their ideas, developing 21st-century skills like computational thinking and...
It can even permit anyone to access its junior program through which kids can learn how to make any app by taking their focus on the study related to programming. Scratch also comes with facilitating users with the...
Scratch, created by MIT students, teaches coding by allowing students to create tales, games, and animations using programming blocks. There is a vibrant online community as well as a step-by-step tutorial to assist...
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Tracking ThinkReview since Oct 2025.
Here's how teaching kids goes without scratch: "This is python, we use it to do professional development work. Here's VS code, we use it to do professional development work. Let's learn them." 6 year olds: "Okay!" Proceeds to mangle... - Source: Hacker News / 3 days ago
What I wonder is: why has nobody noticed that code editors lack a concept of 0? When you're writing code, you can express any concept except that of an unfilled hole. We've rearranged every part of the coding process in a twisted-up way,... - Source: Hacker News / 19 days ago
Sounds like Scratch: https://scratch.mit.edu/. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
When comparing ThinkReview and Scratch, you can also consider the following products.

AI code reviewer that helps teams cut manual code review time and bugs by 50%. Start your 14-days free trial today!
Compare CodeAnt AI to ThinkReview or Scratch:

Code.org is a non-profit whose goal is to expose all students to computer programming.
Compare Code.org to ThinkReview or Scratch:

Unleash AI on Your Code Reviews with CodeRabbit
Compare CodeRabbit to ThinkReview or Scratch:

Feature-packed 2D and 3D open source game engine.
Compare Godot Engine to ThinkReview or Scratch:

Automated code reviews with static analysis.
Compare DeepSource to ThinkReview or Scratch:

GDevelop is an open-source game making software designed to be used by everyone.
Compare GDevelop to ThinkReview or Scratch: