
Scratch
Codecademy
Free Code Camp
Hacker News
W3Schools
Tutorialspoint
SoloLearn
Code.org is a non-profit whose goal is to expose all students to computer programming.

CodeAnt AI
CodeRabbit
DeepSource
GitLab Duo
qodo.ai
CodeReviewBot AI
CodeReviewr
AI-Powered Code Reviews for GitLab, GitHub & Azure DevOps&Bitbucket - Instant Analysis, Security Detection & Conversational Copilot& Review agents. Zero Setup Required. Open Source.

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Code.org seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 385 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | code.org | thinkreview.dev |
| Pricing | — | |
| Platforms | — | |
| Company | 2012 | Startup from the United Kingdom · 1 - 9 employees · 2025 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of Code.org yet.
ThinkReview is a browser extension for AI-assisted code reviews on GitHub, GitLab, Azure DevOps, and Bitbucket. It combines fast review summaries, security and best-practice findings, and structured code suggestions with a practical reviewer workflow: reviewers keep control, can copy/edit...
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
Programming For Kids: Scratch vs Code.org
More videos
ThinkReview Gitlab MR Copilot
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing Code.org and ThinkReview.
ThinkReview's answer:
Its biggest differentiator is the zero-configuration setup. Unlike many competitors, ThinkReview works instantly as a browser extension without needing complex CI/CD integration, setup tokens, or granting access to your entire GitLab/GitHub project. It enhances the developer's existing workflow directly in the browser.
ThinkReview's answer:
You should choose ThinkReview for its simplicity and speed. It's the fastest way to start with AI code reviews—install the extension, and you're done. It empowers individual developers to improve their reviews immediately, without the overhead and enterprise-level pricing of deeply integrated tools.
ThinkReview's answer:
Our primary audience consists of individual developers and small to medium-sized teams using GitLab. It's perfect for developers and team leads who want to improve code quality and efficiency without a complex, top-down implementation process.
ThinkReview's answer:
The story is simple: it was born from the founder's frustration with code reviews being a slow, repetitive bottleneck. The goal was to create a tool that was easy to install, worked out of the box, and acted as a true AI copilot to assist the human reviewer, not just an automated bot.
ThinkReview's answer:
The core of the product is a browser extension built with JavaScript, HTML, and CSS. It communicates securely with major AI and Large Language Model (LLM) APIs to provide its intelligent feedback.
ThinkReview's answer:
As a recently launched tool, our primary user base consists of individual developers and growing teams who have adopted ThinkReview to streamline their personal and team workflows. We are focused on building this grassroots support before targeting large enterprise customers.
Share your experience with using Code.org and ThinkReview. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.


Code.org is an online marketplace that can empower students, specifically students, to get detailed knowledge regarding the principles of the computer sciences. This platform can let its users access the free coding...
Nevertheless, the platform has the stats to prove its dependability. More than 67 million people use Code.org, including over two million teachers. In addition, the platform records over 208 million projects so far.
Code.org is much easier to use than Thunkable.First of all names say everything.Second,it has more modes than just "drag-and-drop".
We have no reviews of ThinkReview yet. Be the first one to post
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Code.org uses an extremely outdated version of javascript, It's so hard to access data in array, im basically forced to do this. Cant wait to ditch this shit. Source: almost 3 years ago
I'm not sure if your 4.5yo is old enough to try Scratch[1] but nothing is too young these days. My elder got into Scratch around that time. These days, my younger one is into https://code.org and she make things go around, do stuffs,... - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
So I am using code.org to make a platforming game, and if I am halfway off of a platform I slide off of it. Idk if this is a quirk with code.org or if I did something wrong. You can check the hitboxes by pressing debug sprites in the... Source: almost 3 years ago
Tracking ThinkReview since Oct 2025.
When comparing Code.org and ThinkReview, you can also consider the following products.

Scratch is the programming language & online community where young people create stories, games, & animations.
Compare Scratch to Code.org or ThinkReview:

AI code reviewer that helps teams cut manual code review time and bugs by 50%. Start your 14-days free trial today!
Compare CodeAnt AI to Code.org or ThinkReview:

Learn the technical skills you need for the job you want. As leaders in online education and learning to code, we’ve taught over 45 million people using a tested curriculum and an interactive learning environment.
Compare Codecademy to Code.org or ThinkReview:

Unleash AI on Your Code Reviews with CodeRabbit
Compare CodeRabbit to Code.org or ThinkReview:

Learn to code by helping nonprofits.
Compare Free Code Camp to Code.org or ThinkReview:

Automated code reviews with static analysis.
Compare DeepSource to Code.org or ThinkReview: