Software Alternatives & Startups

Things VS ProcessMaker

Compare Things VS ProcessMaker and see what are their differences

Things

Things is an easy to use task manager.

Rating
0 reviews
ProcessMaker

ProcessMaker is a top-notch Low Code BPM platform used by dozens of businesses worldwide to design and deploy complex processes.

Rating
0 reviews

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Things seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 58 times since March 2021.

social mentions
58 vs 0
Task Management popularity
100% vs 0%

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Things
ProcessMaker
Website culturedcode.com processmaker.com
Pricing
Company Startup from Germany —
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Things 7 features
ProcessMaker 9 features
  • User Experience
    Things is known for its clean, intuitive, and beautifully designed user interface, making it easy to use.
  • Integration with Apple Ecosystem
    Seamlessly integrates with macOS and iOS devices, offering features like Handoff and deep Apple Calendar integration.
  • Powerful Task Management
    Supports projects, areas, headings, and tags, providing a robust system for managing complex tasks and workflows.
  • Quick Entry
    Provides a quick entry function allowing users to capture tasks efficiently, which can later be categorized and detailed.
  • Updates and Support
    Regularly updated with new features and enhancements, backed by reliable customer support.
  • Keyboard Shortcuts
    Offers extensive keyboard shortcuts for power users to navigate and manage tasks quickly.
  • Natural Language Processing
    Allows users to input tasks using natural language, which is then intelligently parsed and scheduled.

Possible disadvantages

  • Cost
    Things requires a one-time purchase for each platform (macOS, iOS), making it relatively expensive compared to some subscription-based competitors.
  • Platform Limitation
    Only available on Apple devices (macOS and iOS), making it inaccessible for users on Windows, Android, or other platforms.
  • No Collaboration Features
    Lacks built-in collaboration tools, which can be a drawback for teams looking to share and manage tasks collectively.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    While the basic interface is user-friendly, fully utilizing advanced features can require time and a deeper understanding.
  • Limited Automation
    Offers fewer automation options and integrations compared to some competitors like Todoist or Microsoft To Do.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    ProcessMaker offers a drag-and-drop interface that simplifies the design of workflows and business processes for users with minimal coding expertise.
  • Rapid Deployment
    The low-code nature of ProcessMaker allows for faster implementation of business processes, enabling quicker transformation and adaptation to business needs.
  • Cost-Effective
    By allowing users to develop applications with minimal coding, ProcessMaker can reduce the need for extensive IT resources, leading to cost savings.
  • Integration Capabilities
    ProcessMaker supports integration with various third-party applications, which helps create seamless workflows across different systems.
  • Scalability
    ProcessMaker's cloud-based architecture supports scalability, allowing businesses to grow without major changes to their process management systems.
  • Extensive Integration Capabilities
    ProcessMaker supports integration with a wide array of third-party applications and services, including ERP systems, CRM systems, and web services. This allows for seamless data flow between different systems.
  • Agentic AI Workflows
    ProcessMaker supports Agentic AI, allowing users to create autonomous agents that can execute workflows, make decisions, and interact with systems—without human intervention.
  • Process Documentation
    Ensure your workflows are properly documented with little effort. AI documentation will create explanations for your entire process including all of its steps and assets. Or start with the documentation: explain your process first in your own words and generate functional workflow automations from scratch.
  • Robust Reporting and Analytics
    The platform offers extensive reporting and analytics capabilities. Users can generate various reports to track the performance of workflows and gain insights into operational bottlenecks, improving overall efficiency.

Possible disadvantages

  • Customization Limitations
    While ProcessMaker is powerful, there may be some advanced customization needs that require additional coding, which could be a limitation for complex processes.
  • Learning Curve
    For users who are not familiar with BPM or low-code platforms, there can be an initial learning curve that may require training.
  • Performance Issues
    Some users have reported performance issues, particularly when dealing with very large workflows or significant data loads.
  • Dependency on Vendor
    Reliance on ProcessMaker for ongoing updates and support could be a concern if the vendor's priorities change or if they discontinue support.
  • Limited Offline Functionality
    Since ProcessMaker is cloud-based, its functionality is limited when offline, which might be a drawback for some mobile or remote scenarios.
  • Cost of Premium Features
    While the open-source version is free, many advanced features and capabilities are only available in the paid enterprise version. Organizations may incur significant costs if they require these premium features.
  • Scalability Issues
    Some users have reported performance issues and scalability limitations when handling very large or complex workflows. This can be a concern for large enterprises with extensive process automation needs.
  • Limited Customization in UI
    Although ProcessMaker is highly customizable in terms of workflow logic, the customization options for the user interface are somewhat limited compared to other BPM tools. This can be limiting for organizations wanting a highly tailored user experience.
  • Dependency on Third-Party Plugins
    The tool often relies on third-party plugins to extend its functionality. While this makes it versatile, it also introduces potential dependency issues and can complicate the upgrade and maintenance processes.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Things
ProcessMaker

Overall verdict

  • Things is widely regarded as an excellent productivity tool, especially for Apple ecosystem users. It combines elegance with functionality, making it a top choice for those who prefer a minimalist but powerful task manager.

Why this product is good

  • Things by Cultured Code is highly acclaimed for its clean, intuitive design and effective task management features. It provides a seamless user experience with its natural language input, powerful integration with macOS and iOS, and features like projects, areas, deadlines, and reminders that help users organize their tasks efficiently. The app is particularly praised for its focus on simplicity and ease of use, which allows users to focus on their tasks without being overwhelmed by features.

Recommended for

    Things is ideal for individuals who are deeply integrated into the Apple ecosystem and appreciate a minimalist design approach. It's perfect for users who prefer a straightforward, no-frills task management system that emphasizes ease of use, efficiency, and aesthetic appeal.

No analysis of ProcessMaker yet.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Things 3 videos + Add
ProcessMaker 3 videos + Add

Brandon's Cult Movie Reviews: THINGS

More videos

  • - Things 3: Full Review (2019)
  • - OmniFocus vs. Things 3 review: which is best for you?

ProcessMaker's Transfer Credit Evaluation

More videos

  • - Process Intelligence Explainer
  • - ProcessMaker Platform Explainer

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Things
ProcessMaker
100% 100%
0% 0%
60% 60%
40% 40%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%

User comments

Share your experience with using Things and ProcessMaker. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Things no reviews yet
ProcessMaker no reviews yet
  • 11 Ayanza Alternatives

    Things 3 is a multi-award-winning personal task manager that assists you in keeping track of your tasks. The environment of the application is attractive with a fresh new look, delightful integrations, and powerful...

  • Five of the Best To-Do Apps for iOS
    www.macrumors.com · Feb 2020

    Things 3 is one of the few to-do apps that's not subscription based, and it costs $9.99 to purchase. Things 3 is also available for Mac and iPad, though each app must be purchased individually.

View more

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Things 58 mentions
ProcessMaker 0 mentions
  • We don't need startups, we need Digital-Mittelstand
    Correct: https://culturedcode.com/things/ Looks like the different apps (desktop, mobile, iPad) have different prices, but all are one-time payments of $10-$50. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Essential Software for Mac Users: Three Recommended Efficient Tools
    Things 3is an award-winning task management application known for its clean, elegant interface and intuitive usability. It employs a minimalist design style, allowing users to easily add, organize, and view tasks, helping individuals... - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
  • Show HN: I built a task manager that separates "Do" & "Due" dates
    How badly do Twos want to SEO rank on searches for Things? https://culturedcode.com/things/. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago

View more

Tracking ProcessMaker since Jul 2021.

Alternatives to Things and ProcessMaker

When comparing Things and ProcessMaker, you can also consider the following products.