Software Alternatives & Startups

Things VS PostSharp

Compare Things VS PostSharp and see what are their differences

Things

Things is an easy to use task manager.

Rating
0 reviews
PostSharp

Add design patterns to C# and VB without boilerplate code with PostSharp. Choose from ready-made design patterns for C# and VB or create your own.

Rating
0 reviews
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Things seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 58 times since March 2021.

social mentions
58 vs 0
Task Management popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
240+ vs 2

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Things
PostSharp
Website culturedcode.com postsharp.net
Pricing
Company Startup from Germany
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Things 7 features
PostSharp 5 features
  • User Experience
    Things is known for its clean, intuitive, and beautifully designed user interface, making it easy to use.
  • Integration with Apple Ecosystem
    Seamlessly integrates with macOS and iOS devices, offering features like Handoff and deep Apple Calendar integration.
  • Powerful Task Management
    Supports projects, areas, headings, and tags, providing a robust system for managing complex tasks and workflows.
  • Quick Entry
    Provides a quick entry function allowing users to capture tasks efficiently, which can later be categorized and detailed.
  • Updates and Support
    Regularly updated with new features and enhancements, backed by reliable customer support.
  • Keyboard Shortcuts
    Offers extensive keyboard shortcuts for power users to navigate and manage tasks quickly.
  • Natural Language Processing
    Allows users to input tasks using natural language, which is then intelligently parsed and scheduled.

Possible disadvantages

  • Cost
    Things requires a one-time purchase for each platform (macOS, iOS), making it relatively expensive compared to some subscription-based competitors.
  • Platform Limitation
    Only available on Apple devices (macOS and iOS), making it inaccessible for users on Windows, Android, or other platforms.
  • No Collaboration Features
    Lacks built-in collaboration tools, which can be a drawback for teams looking to share and manage tasks collectively.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    While the basic interface is user-friendly, fully utilizing advanced features can require time and a deeper understanding.
  • Limited Automation
    Offers fewer automation options and integrations compared to some competitors like Todoist or Microsoft To Do.
  • Aspect-Oriented Programming (AOP)
    PostSharp allows developers to implement AOP in .NET projects, which helps in separating cross-cutting concerns like logging, error handling, or validation, making the code cleaner and easier to maintain.
  • Code Reusability
    By using aspects, developers can write code that can be easily reused across different parts of an application, reducing redundancy and improving efficiency.
  • Maintainability
    PostSharp helps to create a more modular codebase. With cross-cutting concerns handled separately, it becomes easier to manage and modify without affecting the core business logic.
  • Performance
    PostSharp weaves aspects into compiled code at build time, which generally leads to better runtime performance compared to other AOP approaches that might involve reflection or dynamic proxies.
  • Rich Library of Aspects
    It provides a comprehensive library of pre-built aspects like caching, threading, and security, which can accelerate development by reducing the need to implement common functionalities from scratch.

Possible disadvantages

  • Learning Curve
    For developers unfamiliar with AOP, there might be a steep learning curve to understand and effectively leverage PostSharp's capabilities.
  • Debugging Complexity
    The abstraction layer introduced by aspects can make debugging more challenging as it might not be immediately clear where certain behaviors or errors originate from.
  • Cost
    PostSharp is a commercial product with licensing fees, which might be a concern for small projects or organizations with limited budgets.
  • Build Time Overhead
    The process of weaving aspects into the code can increase the time taken for builds, which might be noticeable and frustrating for very large projects.
  • Vendor Lock-in
    Relying heavily on PostSharp-specific features might lead to challenges if there's a need to switch to a different AOP framework or if PostSharp's development ceases.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Things
PostSharp

Overall verdict

  • Things is widely regarded as an excellent productivity tool, especially for Apple ecosystem users. It combines elegance with functionality, making it a top choice for those who prefer a minimalist but powerful task manager.

Why this product is good

  • Things by Cultured Code is highly acclaimed for its clean, intuitive design and effective task management features. It provides a seamless user experience with its natural language input, powerful integration with macOS and iOS, and features like projects, areas, deadlines, and reminders that help users organize their tasks efficiently. The app is particularly praised for its focus on simplicity and ease of use, which allows users to focus on their tasks without being overwhelmed by features.

Recommended for

    Things is ideal for individuals who are deeply integrated into the Apple ecosystem and appreciate a minimalist design approach. It's perfect for users who prefer a straightforward, no-frills task management system that emphasizes ease of use, efficiency, and aesthetic appeal.

Overall verdict

  • PostSharp is a mature, well-established aspect-oriented programming (AOP) framework for .NET that helps developers reduce boilerplate code through compile-time weaving of cross-cutting concerns like logging, caching, validation, and thread safety. It's a solid choice for teams looking to enforce coding patterns and reduce repetitive code, though it comes with a learning curve and licensing costs for commercial use.

Why this product is good

  • Reduces boilerplate code by automating cross-cutting concerns like logging, caching, and INotifyPropertyChanged implementation
  • Compile-time weaving means better performance compared to runtime-based AOP solutions
  • Strong Visual Studio integration with real-time code visualization of aspects
  • Mature product with many years of development and a stable codebase
  • Includes pre-built pattern libraries for common scenarios (design by contract, multithreading, architecture validation)
  • Helps enforce consistent coding patterns across large teams and codebases
  • Good documentation and support from the vendor

Recommended for

  • Enterprise .NET development teams working on large codebases
  • Teams wanting to enforce architectural patterns and coding standards automatically
  • Projects requiring extensive logging, caching, or validation logic applied consistently
  • Developers familiar with aspect-oriented programming concepts
  • Organizations willing to invest in commercial tooling for productivity gains
  • Teams dealing with legacy code who want to add cross-cutting concerns without heavy refactoring
  • C# and VB.NET developers on the .NET Framework or .NET Core/5+ platforms

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Things 3 videos + Add
PostSharp 3 videos + Add

Brandon's Cult Movie Reviews: THINGS

More videos

  • - Things 3: Full Review (2019)
  • - OmniFocus vs. Things 3 review: which is best for you?

Aspect Oriented Programming with PostSharp | Pluralsight

More videos

  • - Less Boilerplate Code with Metalama by PostSharp
  • - Postsharp - Advanced Aspects Programming

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Things
PostSharp
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%

User comments

Share your experience with using Things and PostSharp. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Things no reviews yet
PostSharp no reviews yet
  • 11 Ayanza Alternatives

    Things 3 is a multi-award-winning personal task manager that assists you in keeping track of your tasks. The environment of the application is attractive with a fresh new look, delightful integrations, and powerful...

  • Five of the Best To-Do Apps for iOS
    www.macrumors.com · Feb 2020

    Things 3 is one of the few to-do apps that's not subscription based, and it costs $9.99 to purchase. Things 3 is also available for Mac and iPad, though each app must be purchased individually.

We have no reviews of PostSharp yet. Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Things 58 mentions
PostSharp 0 mentions
  • We don't need startups, we need Digital-Mittelstand
    Correct: https://culturedcode.com/things/ Looks like the different apps (desktop, mobile, iPad) have different prices, but all are one-time payments of $10-$50. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Essential Software for Mac Users: Three Recommended Efficient Tools
    Things 3is an award-winning task management application known for its clean, elegant interface and intuitive usability. It employs a minimalist design style, allowing users to easily add, organize, and view tasks, helping individuals... - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
  • Show HN: I built a task manager that separates "Do" & "Due" dates
    How badly do Twos want to SEO rank on searches for Things? https://culturedcode.com/things/. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago

View more

Tracking PostSharp since Mar 2021.

Alternatives to Things and PostSharp

When comparing Things and PostSharp, you can also consider the following products.