Things Reviews

GPTZero Reviews

Things mentions (58)

• We don't need startups, we need Digital-Mittelstand

  Correct: https://culturedcode.com/things/ Looks like the different apps (desktop, mobile, iPad) have different prices, but all are one-time payments of $10-$50. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

• Essential Software for Mac Users: Three Recommended Efficient Tools

  Things 3is an award-winning task management application known for its clean, elegant interface and intuitive usability. It employs a minimalist design style, allowing users to easily add, organize, and view tasks, helping individuals efficiently manage daily affairs. While Things 3 does not support team collaboration features, it provides a smooth user experience on macOS as a personal task management tool. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago

• Show HN: I built a task manager that separates "Do" & "Due" dates

  How badly do Twos want to SEO rank on searches for Things? https://culturedcode.com/things/. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago

• Ask HN: What macOS apps/programs do you use daily and recommend?

  Alfred - Productivity App for macOS [1] iTerm2 - macOS Terminal Replacement [2] Dropshare App - upload anything anywhere on macOS [3] Mimestream - A native macOS email client for Gmail [4] Things - To-Do List for Mac & iOS [5] [1] https://www.alfredapp.com [2] https://iterm2.com [3] https://dropshare.app [4] https://mimestream.com [5] https://culturedcode.com/things. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago

• Ready to advance from Evernote, looking at Obsidian

  Currently, I use Things (https://culturedcode.com/things/) for tasks and Evernote for notes, and experimented with Freeform (I love the visual aspect and simplicity). At work, I've used Notion, Mural, Miro, LucidChart, Quip, and many other collaboration-based knowledge systems. I never researched the best of personal knowledge systems until now. Source: almost 3 years ago

GPTZero mentions (75)

• Optimize an AI agent to sound human, judged by an AI detector

  AI-likeness is the target, and it's the one judge that has to live in code, because it isn't an LLM. You score the reply with GPTZero, an AI detector. The score is 1 - P(human): near 0 when GPTZero reads the reply as human, which is your goal, and near 1 for AI or mixed text. Lower is better, so the bootstrap marks the judge inverted and the optimizer drives the score down. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago

• Shifts in U.S. Social Media Use, 2020–2024: Decline, Fragmentation, Polarization

  Obvious AI tells abound in the text and in the GitHub repo, which is clearly 100% vibe coded. If you cannot see this, then I don't know what to tell you. Actually, I do. For the text of the paper, paste any section after the "Introduction" section into https://gptzero.me/. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago

• Detecting AI Slop: Techniques & Red Flags

  GPTZero - Commercial AI detection service with free tier. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago

• Why every Rust crate feels like a research paper on abstraction

  Was curious, so I tried it in several different AI detectors to see what they returned. Most seemed to believe it was approximately 2/3 AI generated text. Primarily the first several paragraphs. Last, and second to last scored the best as "human". ZeroGPT said it was only 5% likely AI written. Couple sentences. Not sure if that means its actually AI written, cause there's lots of argument about false... - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago

• America's top companies keep talking about AI – but can't explain the upsides

  For the benefit of external observers, you can stick the comment into either https://gptzero.me/ or https://copyleaks.com/ai-content-detector - neither are perfectly reliable, but the comment stuck out to me as obviously LLM-generated (I see a lot of LLM-generated content in my day job), and false positives from these services are actually kinda rare (false negatives much more common). But if you want to get a... - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago