Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Things VS Crystal (programming language)

Compare Things VS Crystal (programming language) and see what are their differences

PrivacyNotes
Zero-knowledge encrypted notes, tasks, journals, files, and passwords in one app. Your keys never leave your device. One-time price, no subscription. Hosted in Switzerland. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. ยป Base Details
  2. ยป Videos
  3. ยป Reviews
  4. ยป Alternatives

Things logo Things

Things is an easy to use task manager.

Crystal (programming language) logo Crystal (programming language)

Programming language with Ruby-like syntax that compiles to efficient native code.
  • Things Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-17
  • Crystal (programming language) Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-01-26

Things features and specs

  • User Experience
    Things is known for its clean, intuitive, and beautifully designed user interface, making it easy to use.
  • Integration with Apple Ecosystem
    Seamlessly integrates with macOS and iOS devices, offering features like Handoff and deep Apple Calendar integration.
  • Powerful Task Management
    Supports projects, areas, headings, and tags, providing a robust system for managing complex tasks and workflows.
  • Quick Entry
    Provides a quick entry function allowing users to capture tasks efficiently, which can later be categorized and detailed.
  • Updates and Support
    Regularly updated with new features and enhancements, backed by reliable customer support.
  • Keyboard Shortcuts
    Offers extensive keyboard shortcuts for power users to navigate and manage tasks quickly.
  • Natural Language Processing
    Allows users to input tasks using natural language, which is then intelligently parsed and scheduled.

Possible disadvantages of Things

  • Cost
    Things requires a one-time purchase for each platform (macOS, iOS), making it relatively expensive compared to some subscription-based competitors.
  • Platform Limitation
    Only available on Apple devices (macOS and iOS), making it inaccessible for users on Windows, Android, or other platforms.
  • No Collaboration Features
    Lacks built-in collaboration tools, which can be a drawback for teams looking to share and manage tasks collectively.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    While the basic interface is user-friendly, fully utilizing advanced features can require time and a deeper understanding.
  • Limited Automation
    Offers fewer automation options and integrations compared to some competitors like Todoist or Microsoft To Do.

Crystal (programming language) features and specs

  • Performance
    Crystal is designed to have the performance of C, thanks to its compilation to efficient native code. Its static type system and low-level memory management capabilities allow optimized execution.
  • Syntax
    Crystal offers a syntax that is heavily inspired by Ruby, making it intuitive and familiar for Ruby developers. This can significantly reduce the learning curve and improve developer productivity.
  • Type Inference
    Crystal provides powerful type inference, enabling developers to write less boilerplate code while still benefiting from the safety and performance of a statically-typed language.
  • Concurrency
    Crystal supports lightweight concurrency with fibers, which allows developers to write efficient and scalable concurrent programs with a simpler syntax compared to traditional threading models.
  • Community and Ecosystem
    Crystal has an active and growing community. It also boasts a rich ecosystem with libraries and tools, making it easier for developers to find resources and support.

Possible disadvantages of Crystal (programming language)

  • Maturity
    Crystal is still a relatively young language compared to more established languages like Python or Java. This can mean fewer resources, libraries, and tools, as well as potential instability in certain areas.
  • Compilation Time
    Crystal's compilation times can be slower compared to interpreted languages, particularly for larger codebases. This can impact development workflows and iteration speed.
  • Binary Size
    Compiled Crystal programs tend to generate larger binary sizes compared to other compiled languages like Go or Rust. This can be a consideration for resource-constrained environments.
  • Platform Support
    Being less mature, Crystal may have fewer options for platform-specific optimizations and integrations, which could limit its use in certain specialized applications.
  • Tooling
    Although the situation is improving, Crystal's tooling ecosystem is not as mature as those of older languages. This can affect the availability and quality of IDE support, debugging tools, and other development aids.

Analysis of Things

Overall verdict

  • Things is widely regarded as an excellent productivity tool, especially for Apple ecosystem users. It combines elegance with functionality, making it a top choice for those who prefer a minimalist but powerful task manager.

Why this product is good

  • Things by Cultured Code is highly acclaimed for its clean, intuitive design and effective task management features. It provides a seamless user experience with its natural language input, powerful integration with macOS and iOS, and features like projects, areas, deadlines, and reminders that help users organize their tasks efficiently. The app is particularly praised for its focus on simplicity and ease of use, which allows users to focus on their tasks without being overwhelmed by features.

Recommended for

    Things is ideal for individuals who are deeply integrated into the Apple ecosystem and appreciate a minimalist design approach. It's perfect for users who prefer a straightforward, no-frills task management system that emphasizes ease of use, efficiency, and aesthetic appeal.

Analysis of Crystal (programming language)

Overall verdict

  • Crystal is considered a good choice for developers who appreciate the syntax and flexibility of Ruby but require the performance and safety of a compiled language. Its balance of readability and efficiency makes it ideal for projects where high performance is critical but developer productivity cannot be sacrificed. However, potential users should consider the relatively smaller community compared to more established languages.

Why this product is good

  • Crystal is designed to combine the elegance and productivity of Ruby with the performance and efficiency of a compiled language. It offers a syntax that is close to Ruby, making it easy to read and write, while its compiler produces highly optimized native code. The language features static type checking, which helps catch errors at compile time, and it comes with powerful concurrency support through lightweight fibers. Additionally, Crystal's extensive standard library and growing ecosystem make it suitable for a wide range of applications.

Recommended for

  • Developers who enjoy Ruby's syntax but need better performance.
  • Projects that require strong concurrency support.
  • Applications where native code performance is a priority.
  • Developers willing to explore a language with a smaller ecosystem.

Things videos

+ Add

Brandon's Cult Movie Reviews: THINGS

More videos:

  • Review - Things 3: Full Review (2019)
  • Review - OmniFocus vs. Things 3 review: which is best for you?

Crystal (programming language) videos

No Crystal (programming language) videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Things and Crystal (programming language))

Things

Crystal (programming language)

Task Management
100 100%
Task Management
0% 0
Programming Language
0 0%
Programming Language
100% 100
Project Management
100 100%
Project Management
0% 0
Generic Programming Language
0 0%
Generic Programming Language
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Things and Crystal (programming language). For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Things and Crystal (programming language)

Things Reviews

11 Ayanza Alternatives
Things 3 is a multi-award-winning personal task manager that assists you in keeping track of your tasks. The environment of the application is attractive with a fresh new look, delightful integrations, and powerful features. It has been completely effective to boost efficiency with easy to use and is attractive to the eye. The themes are a creative and powerful feature that...
Source: www.justalternativeto.com
Five of the Best To-Do Apps for iOS
Things 3 is one of the few to-do apps that's not subscription based, and it costs $9.99 to purchase. Things 3 is also available for Mac and iPad, though each app must be purchased individually.
Source: www.macrumors.com

Crystal (programming language) Reviews

We have no reviews of Crystal (programming language) yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Crystal (programming language) should be more popular than Things. It has been mentiond 123 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Things mentions (58)

  • We don't need startups, we need Digital-Mittelstand
    Correct: https://culturedcode.com/things/ Looks like the different apps (desktop, mobile, iPad) have different prices, but all are one-time payments of $10-$50. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Essential Software for Mac Users: Three Recommended Efficient Tools
    Things 3is an award-winning task management application known for its clean, elegant interface and intuitive usability. It employs a minimalist design style, allowing users to easily add, organize, and view tasks, helping individuals efficiently manage daily affairs. While Things 3 does not support team collaboration features, it provides a smooth user experience on macOS as a personal task management tool. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Show HN: I built a task manager that separates "Do" & "Due" dates
    How badly do Twos want to SEO rank on searches for Things? https://culturedcode.com/things/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Ask HN: What macOS apps/programs do you use daily and recommend?
    Alfred - Productivity App for macOS [1] iTerm2 - macOS Terminal Replacement [2] Dropshare App - upload anything anywhere on macOS [3] Mimestream - A native macOS email client for Gmail [4] Things - To-Do List for Mac & iOS [5] [1] https://www.alfredapp.com [2] https://iterm2.com [3] https://dropshare.app [4] https://mimestream.com [5] https://culturedcode.com/things. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • Ready to advance from Evernote, looking at Obsidian
    Currently, I use Things (https://culturedcode.com/things/) for tasks and Evernote for notes, and experimented with Freeform (I love the visual aspect and simplicity). At work, I've used Notion, Mural, Miro, LucidChart, Quip, and many other collaboration-based knowledge systems. I never researched the best of personal knowledge systems until now. Source: almost 3 years ago
View more

Crystal (programming language) mentions (123)

  • Ruby for Good
    Which can include type assertions but also a lot more. The agents seem to do well with this. I've also had good results using agents to write Crystal https://crystal-lang.org/ which is Ruby-like but does have the static types and produces blazing fast static binaries. Might be a sweet spot for coding agents if you're building some backend services. But I'd still pick Ruby on Rails for a new full stack project. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
  • Ask HN: What Are You Working On? (May 2026)
    Sounds a lot like Crystal, which is also similar to Ruby and features a green fiber runtime: https://crystal-lang.org/#concurrency. - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago
  • A Grand Vision for Rust
    > 1. Go with a better type system. A compiled language, that has sum types, no-nil, and generics. I was looking for something like that and eventually found Crystal (https://crystal-lang.org) as a closest match: LLVM compiled, strong static typing with explicit nulls and very good type inference, stackfull coroutines, channels etc. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Response to Ruby Is Not a Serious Programming Language
    Wondering why https://crystal-lang.org/ hasn't been mentioned in the comments. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
  • Show HN: รœ Programming Language
    > What kind of code snippets could you suggest? Anything really! Some websites that do this currently: https://ziglang.org, https://crystal-lang.org and https://www.ruby-lang.org/en > I have a comparison table mentioning features Yes - I did see this in the README. Maybe worth adding it, or something similar to the website. - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Things and Crystal (programming language), you can also consider the following products

Todoist - Todoist is a to-do list that helps you get organized, at work and in life.

Nim (programming language) - The Nim programming language is a concise, fast programming language that compiles to C, C++ and JavaScript.

TickTick - TickTickis a cross-platform to-do list app & task manager helps you to get all things done and make life well organized.

Go Programming Language - Go, also called golang, is a programming language initially developed at Google in 2007 by Robert...

Remember The Milk - Remember The Milk is a task and time management application for mobile devices.

V (programming language) - Simple, fast, safe, compiled language for developing maintainable software.

Loading...