thinBasic VS pikaur

• Simplicity
  thinBasic offers a straightforward syntax that is easy to learn for beginners, making it an accessible choice for those new to programming.
• Rapid Development
  Due to its simplicity and focus on procedural programming, thinBasic allows for quick prototyping and development of small to medium-sized programs.
• Rich Feature Set
  Despite its simplicity, thinBasic provides a wide range of features and modules, including support for graphics, sound, file manipulation, and more.
• Community Support
  thinBasic has an active user community and forums, where users can share scripts, discuss problems, and get support for their projects.

Possible disadvantages

• Limited Object-Oriented Support
  thinBasic is primarily a procedural language and offers limited support for object-oriented programming, which may not meet the needs of developers accustomed to modern OOP languages.
• Platform Dependency
  thinBasic is primarily designed for Windows, which can be a restriction for developers seeking cross-platform compatibility.
• Performance Constraints
  As an interpreted language, thinBasic might not be suitable for applications that require high performance or computational efficiency.
• Niche Use Case
  The language is somewhat niche and not as widely adopted in the industry, which could result in a limited job market and fewer resources compared to more popular programming languages.

• AUR Helper
  Pikaur is an Arch User Repository (AUR) helper, which simplifies the process of installing and managing AUR packages on Arch Linux systems.
• Interactive Search
  It provides an interactive search feature that allows users to easily find and select packages using a command-line interface.
• Dependency Management
  Automatically resolves and manages package dependencies, making installation and updates easier for users.
• User-friendly Interface
  Offers a user-friendly interface that improves the overall experience of managing packages compared to using standard pacman commands.
• Sudo Privilege Management
  Manages sudo privileges efficiently, requiring fewer password prompts during package operations.

Possible disadvantages

• Limited to Arch-based Systems
  Pikaur is specifically designed for Arch Linux and its derivatives, limiting its use to those systems.
• Dependency on Python
  Requires Python, meaning users need to ensure Python is installed and properly configured on their system.
• Potential for AUR Package Issues
  Since AUR packages are user-generated, there can be inconsistencies or issues with package scripts that might affect installations.
• Security Risks
  As with other AUR helpers, users may inadvertently install potentially harmful or insecure software from the AUR.
• Learning Curve
  New users may face a learning curve when first using Pikaur compared to more graphical or traditional package managers.

No thinBasic videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Pikaur et Wish, deux successeurs potentiels à Pacaur ?

Tracking thinBasic since Mar 2021.

• Using pikaur, how would I disable asking me "Do you want to edit PKGBUILD for <package_name> package? [Y/n]"

  Have a look here. Did you not search for the answer? That's part of the Arch(based) ethos. We tend to like to learn by reading whatever is required. :). Source: over 3 years ago

• Nala v0.10.0 - Nala's A Legible Apt

  I was also looking for something nicer for Arch, but haven't found anything as nice as Nala. For now, I switched to pikaur, which at least displays updates in a much clearer way. Source: over 4 years ago

• I created a tool to install AUR packages in 1 click from the website: Aurin

  Nice, but this definately needs a dependency resolver, otherwise it can only install a fraction of the available AUR packages. Since you're already using python, you may adapt your whole code on top a another python-based AUR helper like... Source: over 4 years ago

View more