
Fast.com
Speedtest.net
SpeedOf.Me
LibreSpeed
Speed Test by Cloudflare
nPerf
OpenSpeedTest
Accurately test your Internet connection speed with this powerful broadband speed test. Improve your bandwidth speed with the truth.

Bump.sh
Spectral
Optic
Contract-change decisions with signed, offline-verifiable receipts: a change to an API or MCP contract merges only with a grant bound to that exact change.

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Testmy.net seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 175 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | testmy.net | coderifts.com |
| Pricing | — | |
| Platforms | — | |
| Company | — | 2026 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of Testmy.net yet.
CodeRifts decides whether a change to an API or MCP contract may merge, and signs the decision. A GitHub App and a GitHub Action post two checks on every pull request that touches a contract file: CodeRifts / issuer and CodeRifts / contract-gate. Require both in branch protection, and a breaking...
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
This tool is particularly recommended for individuals who require consistent and accurate monitoring of their internet speed, such as gamers, remote workers, and tech enthusiasts who need to troubleshoot connectivity issues effectively.
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
Speed Test at testmy.net
No CodeRifts videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing Testmy.net and CodeRifts.
CodeRifts's answer:
A field rename broke a POS system across 19 restaurants for a week. The PR passed review, tests were green, nobody checked the contract. CodeRifts started as the check that catches this before merge. Then the author of the change stopped being a person: AI agents now propose and execute contract changes, and the question became not just "is this safe" but "was this authorized, and can you prove it later" — which is what the signed, offline-verifiable gate answers.
CodeRifts's answer:
Node.js and Express; Ed25519 signatures with a pinned public keyring; PostgreSQL on Railway; an MCP server with three tools listed in the official MCP Registry; the GitHub Apps and Checks API for merge enforcement; a JavaScript and Python receipt verifier (MIT); Cloudflare Pages for the site. Verified live with npx @coderifts/conformance.
CodeRifts's answer:
Every decision CodeRifts makes is an Ed25519-signed receipt that anyone can verify offline — no API key, no account, no CodeRifts server in the loop. The verdict is a named state (CONTINUE, CONTINUE_WITH_MONITORING, REQUEST_APPROVAL, STOP), not a score, and it ships with its own published limits: the "does not prove" statements served live at /.well-known/coderifts.json. Where authorization cannot be established, the answer is never an assumed yes.
CodeRifts's answer:
Diff tools tell you what changed in a contract. CodeRifts decides whether an AI agent may proceed with that change, spends a single-use grant on execution, and keeps the GitHub required check red until the grant exists — and the evidence survives us: the receipt verifies against a pinned key snapshot with a public MIT verifier. If your question is "who allowed that, and can I prove it without trusting the vendor's database", that is the difference.
CodeRifts's answer:
Three people. The one who runs AI agents in production and needs "who allowed that change" to be more than a log line they also control. The one adding a gate to an agent runtime who needs a state to branch on, not a score. And the one an auditor will ask, who needs evidence that survives the vendor. If none of these is you yet, you probably do not need this today.
CodeRifts's answer:
Share your experience with using Testmy.net and CodeRifts. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Hello! Ever since moving into a new house, I've haven't been getting the speeds I've expecting. Specifically, videos and websites will fail to load or load extremely slowly most of the time. The odd thing is, when running a speed test... Source: almost 3 years ago
Another speed test site is https://testmy.net The site claims superior accuracy (which I can't confirm but probably someone here can evaluate one way or the other). The site offers a number of test options and other amenities. I'll have... - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
T-Mobile - 5G WI-FI decently priced... If it only worked! Below I'll post my results from a few hours of a test I did today using Testmy.net. This is an every day occurrence. You could be watching a YouTube video at a nice 1080p60, but... Source: over 3 years ago
Tracking CodeRifts since Mar 2026.
When comparing Testmy.net and CodeRifts, you can also consider the following products.

Quickly test your internet speed with this fast-loading speed test powered by Netflix.
Compare Fast.com to Testmy.net or CodeRifts:

Much more than stunning docs. For all your APIs.
Compare Bump.sh to Testmy.net or CodeRifts:

Test your Internet connection bandwidth to locations around the world with this interactive broadband speed test from Ookla
Compare Speedtest.net to Testmy.net or CodeRifts:

Spectral is an experimental Sinclair ZX Spectrum emulator from the 80s, which has been randomly assembled since the pandemic days. Accuracy and performance are long-term goals, but the primary focus is just having fun with this thing.
Compare Spectral to Testmy.net or CodeRifts:

SpeedOf.Me is an HTML5 Internet speed test. No Flash or Java needed!
Compare SpeedOf.Me to Testmy.net or CodeRifts:
