Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Substack VS arXiv

Compare Substack VS arXiv and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Substack logo Substack

With Substack, anyone can start a publication that combines a personal website, blog, and email newsletter or podcast. It's quick and simple.

arXiv logo arXiv

arXiv is a free distribution service and an open-access archive for scholarly articles.
  • Substack Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-10-26
  • arXiv Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-23

Substack features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Substack offers a user-friendly interface that makes it easy for writers to publish and monetize their newsletters.
  • Built-in Monetization
    Writers can easily charge readers for subscriptions, allowing for straightforward monetization.
  • Direct Audience Connection
    Substack allows writers to build a direct relationship with their audience via email, which can lead to a more engaged readership.
  • Discovery and Community
    Features like staff picks and recommendations help writers get discovered by new readers.
  • No Upfront Costs
    Substack does not charge upfront fees; instead, it takes a percentage of subscription revenues, making it easier to start.
  • Content Ownership
    Writers retain full ownership of their content, giving them more control over their work.

Possible disadvantages of Substack

  • Revenue Share
    Substack takes a 10% cut of subscription revenues, which can add up for writers with a large subscriber base.
  • Limited Customization
    The platform has limited customization options compared to building a custom website or using more flexible CMS options.
  • Dependency on Platform
    Relying on Substack means depending on its policies and infrastructure, which could pose risks if the platform changes its terms or features.
  • Competition
    As more writers join Substack, it can become challenging to stand out amidst the growing competition.
  • Email Deliverability
    Writers may face issues with email deliverability, as some newsletters may end up in spam folders.
  • Payment Processing Fees
    Besides Substack's fee, payment processors like Stripe also take a percentage, further reducing net earnings for writers.

arXiv features and specs

  • Open Access
    arXiv offers free access to a wide range of scientific papers, providing open access to high-quality research without paywalls.
  • Rapid Dissemination
    Researchers can quickly share their findings with the global community, potentially accelerating scientific progress.
  • Large Repository
    With millions of papers in various fields such as physics, computer science, and mathematics, arXiv is a comprehensive resource for researchers.
  • Preprints
    Authors can share their manuscripts before formal peer review, which allows for immediate feedback and increased visibility.
  • Community and Collaborations
    arXiv fosters a collaborative environment where researchers can easily find and build on each other's work.

Possible disadvantages of arXiv

  • Lack of Peer Review
    Papers submitted to arXiv are not peer-reviewed, which means the quality and reliability of the content can vary.
  • Overwhelming Volume
    The sheer number of papers can make it difficult to find relevant and high-quality research.
  • Variable Quality
    Since submissions are not vetted through a rigorous peer review process, the quality of papers can range from excellent to poor.
  • Potential for Plagiarism
    The open nature of arXiv can sometimes lead to issues with plagiarism or uncredited use of ideas.
  • Not Recognized by Some Journals
    Some academic journals do not consider papers uploaded to arXiv as unpublished, which can affect a researcherโ€™s ability to publish in those journals.

Analysis of Substack

Overall verdict

  • Substack is a good choice for writers seeking autonomy and a straightforward way to monetize their content. However, it may not be the best fit for those who prefer working within the framework of a larger publication or those unfamiliar with the challenges of building and maintaining a subscriber base.

Why this product is good

  • Substack is a platform that allows writers, journalists, and content creators to publish and monetize their newsletters. It is praised for its ease of use, built-in subscription system, and direct-to-consumer model which enables writers to retain control over their audience and content. The platform has attracted both independent writers and established journalists seeking the freedom to monetize their work without traditional media constraints.

Recommended for

  • Independent writers and journalists
  • Content creators looking to monetize their work
  • Individuals seeking a direct relationship with their audience
  • Those who appreciate simplicity in publishing

Analysis of arXiv

Overall verdict

  • Yes, arXiv is considered good, especially for academics and researchers who need access to the latest research developments or want to share their work broadly and promptly.

Why this product is good

  • arXiv is a highly respected open-access repository for scholarly articles in fields such as physics, computer science, mathematics, statistics, and more. It allows researchers to share their findings quickly and receive feedback from the global academic community. As a preprint server, it aids in the rapid dissemination of research, which can be critical in rapidly evolving fields and during public health crises.

Recommended for

    Students, researchers, and academics in scientific fields who are looking for early access to research outputs or wish to publish their own preprints for peer feedback. It's also beneficial for anyone interested in staying up-to-date with cutting-edge developments in science and technology.

Substack videos

Monetizing Podcasts and Newsletters - Chris Best of Substack and Jonathan Gill of Backtracks

More videos:

  • Review - E1016 Substack CEO Chris Best empowers writers via email newsletter platform, raised $15M from a16z
  • Review - Why EVERYONE should be on Substack | What it is, How it Works, $$$
  • Review - Beehiiv vs Substack (2024) - Which is Better?
  • Review - My Experience with SUBSTACK: An Honest Review of Substack

arXiv videos

How to submit a paper to arxiv

More videos:

  • Review - Do Research on arXiv
  • Review - RNAAS banned on arXiv

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Substack and arXiv)
Blogging
100 100%
0% 0
Education
0 0%
100% 100
CMS
100 100%
0% 0
Ebooks
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Substack and arXiv. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Substack and arXiv

Substack Reviews

25+ Medium Alternative Platforms for Publishing Articles
Substack offers writers of all experience levels the ability to write an email newsletter thatโ€™s profitable through subscriptions. Substack provides purpose-built web and newsletter publishing tools to enable writers to monetize their newsletters. It is a service often favoured by readers because itโ€™s a convenient all-in-one solution for writing a successful podcast that...
Source: forgefusion.io
10 Best Medium Alternatives for Reading and Publishing
What sะตts Substack apart is its sะตamlะตss intะตgration of contะตnt crะตation and subscription-basะตd monะตtization. Substackโ€™s usะตr-friะตndly intะตrfacะต, distribution tools, and support for various contะตnt formats make it a popular choice for indะตpะตndะตnt crะตators looking to connะตct dirะตctly with thะตir audiะตncะต and turn thะตir passion into a sustainablะต incomะต strะตam.
9 Best Medium Alternatives for Making Money With Your Writing in 2023
Substack and Medium differ primarily in their monetization methods. Medium pays creators based on reader engagement, while Substack enables writers to monetize directly through paid subscriptions to their newsletters. This business model allows Substack users to build a direct relationship with their readers via their email inboxes, whereas Medium interactions primarily...
11 Patreon Alternatives for Audience Monetization in 2023
Like a few of the other platforms weโ€™ve looked at, Substack takes a cut of your earnings rather than charging a 10% platform fee.
Source: www.uscreen.tv
Any good Mailchimp alternatives?
My question for you is, what is keeping you from making $31 per month from your list? Are you using any feature that Substack (free until you get paid) can't handle?

arXiv Reviews

We have no reviews of arXiv yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, arXiv should be more popular than Substack. It has been mentiond 334 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Substack mentions (102)

  • Writing by Hand is Good for your Brain
    It's ironic that the article that caused him to write this post (https://substack.com/@justindeschamps/note/c-261265212?utm_source=notes-share-action&r=7y05q) is written by AI. I see this style of informational writing all over the place now. - Source: Hacker News / 5 days ago
  • Ask HN: What are your favorite blogs not about AI?
    Https://substack.com/@yelluwcomedy. - Source: Hacker News / 8 days ago
  • Kids (With Phones) Are Alright
    Sure there was basically a cartel in social media. You saw coordinated censorship campaigns to ban the former president of the United States for example. But I wouldn't discount the amount of political interference there as well. The last administration admitted to flagging individual posts for the social media companies. But it's also true there is a lot of coordinated censorship even without state interference.... - Source: Hacker News / 17 days ago
  • Financing the AI boom: from cash flows to debt [pdf]
    Manhattan Project: $36B, 5 years โ–ซ Apollo Program: $257B, 14 years โ–ซ Interstate Highway System: $620B, 37 years โ–ซ AI data centers: $930B, 6 years and still accelerating From: https://substack.com/@rubendominguez/note/c-244929068. - Source: Hacker News / 13 days ago
  • SpaceX to buy Cursor AI coding agent operator Anysphere for $60B
    The thing is, even the center of the road academics who refrain from such comparisons are noting the similarity. The MAGA movement meets the traditional defining characteristics of fascio. We can be rigid and say that only Mussoliniโ€˜s political movement can be properly be called fascist. But if we call Hitler and the Nazis fascists as well, then we open the door to any movement that meets the criteria. And Trump... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
View more

arXiv mentions (334)

  • How to Evaluate AI Agents: 3 Framework Comparison
    The evaluation landscape for AI agents saw 45+ new research papers in the past 6 months on arXiv (Cornell University's open-access preprint repository), proposing new metrics for trajectory quality (TRACE), hallucination detection (LSC), and cost-performance tradeoffs (KAMI). But when it comes to implementing these evaluations, which framework should you use? - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • I Built a $0 Search Engine on Real Web Data (No Algolia or Elasticsearch)
    I depend heavily on arxiv papers for this. Using a SERP API (Bright Data) for Google, running site:arxiv.org plus a well-framed query gets me recent, relevant papers. Iโ€™d run four or five of these, collate the resultsโ€ฆand then inevitably get bogged down scrolling JSON, opening new tabs, running grep. Just godawful UX for what is, at its core, a search problem (not data). - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Adiรณs a Agile en 2026: el auge del Spec-Driven Development con IA
    ArXiv โ€” Repositorio del paper "Spec-Driven Development: From Code to Contract in the Age of AI" (enero 2026). - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Should You Be Using RAG in 2026?
    Research shows that hallucinations remain prevalent in complex reasoning and open-domain factual recall, where error rates can exceed 33%. In a customer-facing application, that is not a product quirk. That is a liability. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • LLM Fine-Tuning: The Complete Guide to Customizing Language Models (2026)
    This guide synthesizes the technical depth of Unsloth, the security perspective of Lakera, and the academic rigor of the arXiv comprehensive survey โ€” with an enterprise decision framework and cost analysis that none of them provide. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Substack and arXiv, you can also consider the following products

Ghost - Ghost is a fully open source, adaptable platform for building and running a modern online publication. We power blogs, magazines and journalists from Zappos to Sky News.

SCI-HUB - It provides mass and public access to tens of millions of research papers

Medium - Welcome to Medium, a place to read, write, and interact with the stories that matter most to you.

Google Scholar - Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text of scholarly...

MailChimp - MailChimp is the best way to design, send, and share email newsletters.

PubMed.gov - PubMed comprises more than 29 million citations for biomedical literature from MEDLINE, life science journals, and online books. Citations may include links to full-text content from PubMed Central and publisher web sites.