Submittable VS git-sizer

• User-Friendly Interface
  Submittable offers an intuitive and easy-to-use interface for both submitters and reviewers, which simplifies the submission and review process.
• Streamlined Workflow
  The platform supports a streamlined workflow with automated email notifications, task assignments, and status tracking, improving efficiency in managing submissions.
• Customizable Forms
  Users can create fully customizable submission forms tailored to their specific needs, allowing for more precise data collection.
• Collaboration Tools
  Submittable provides robust collaboration tools, allowing multiple reviewers to provide feedback, discuss submissions, and make collective decisions.
• Analytics and Reporting
  The platform offers detailed analytics and reporting features, enabling users to track submission trends, reviewer activity, and overall performance.

Possible disadvantages

• Pricing
  Submittable can be expensive, especially for smaller organizations or individuals, as pricing scales with the volume of submissions and additional features.
• Limited Free Plan
  The free plan offered by Submittable is quite limited in terms of features and submission volume, necessitating an upgrade for more robust needs.
• Learning Curve
  While the interface is user-friendly, there can be a learning curve for new users to fully utilize all the advanced features and functionalities.
• Customization Limitations
  Although forms are customizable, some users may find limitations in customizing the broader workflow and integration aspects to fit their unique requirements.
• Dependency on Internet
  As a cloud-based platform, Submittable requires a reliable internet connection for access, which can be a drawback in areas with poor connectivity.

• Comprehensive Repository Analysis
  git-sizer analyzes many different dimensions of a Git repository including commit count, tree size, blob size, history depth, and reference counts, providing a holistic view of repository health and potential scaling issues.
• Easy to Use
  The tool is simple to run with minimal setup—just execute it within a git repository—and it produces clear, human-readable output that highlights potential problem areas without requiring complex configuration.
• Identifies Performance Bottlenecks
  It helps identify specific issues that could degrade Git performance, such as excessively large blobs, deep history, large trees, or too many references, which is valuable before migrating or scaling repositories.
• Open Source and Maintained by GitHub
  Being an official GitHub project, it benefits from credibility, community trust, and ongoing maintenance, and it is well documented with clear explanations of what each metric means.
• Useful for Pre-Migration Checks
  It's particularly helpful for teams migrating repositories to new platforms or consolidating repos, as it flags potential issues that could cause problems during migration or with hosting providers' limits.

Possible disadvantages

• No Automatic Remediation
  git-sizer only identifies and reports issues but does not offer any built-in tools or automated processes to fix problems like large blobs or excessive history depth—users must use separate tools like BFG Repo-Cleaner or git-filter-repo.
• Output Can Be Overwhelming for Beginners
  While detailed, the output includes many metrics and threshold levels that may be confusing for users unfamiliar with Git internals, requiring some learning curve to fully interpret results.
• Limited to Local Analysis
  The tool analyzes a local clone of the repository, so it requires users to have a full local copy of the repo (or at least enough history) to get accurate results, which can be time-consuming for very large repositories.
• No Real-Time Monitoring
  It functions as a one-time analysis tool rather than providing continuous or real-time monitoring of repository health, requiring manual reruns to track changes over time.
• Command-Line Only Interface
  The tool lacks a graphical user interface, which may be less accessible for users who prefer visual dashboards or are less comfortable with command-line tools.

Submittable: Accept and review any digital content

More videos

No git-sizer videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

• Looking for art zines

  Try checking out Submittable https://submittable.com/ and Chillsubs https://chillsubs.com/ to look for journals, zines and other publications that are seeking art :) Good luck! Source: about 4 years ago

• [HELP] How to publish as a new poet.

  You send them into literary magazines & journals. chillsubs.com + submittable.com + duotrope.com are good places to start. Source: over 4 years ago

• [help]

  You'll need a Submittable account for most mainstream submissions these days. Source: over 4 years ago

View more

• how to keep github repos small?

  Also there’s a cool project from GitHub you can use to help understand the size of git’s objects in your git repo https://github.com/github/git-sizer. This might help you determine what the best cloning strategy could be. Source: almost 5 years ago