Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Strong.app VS D (Programming Language)

Compare Strong.app VS D (Programming Language) and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Strong.app logo Strong.app

Strenght training logger.

D (Programming Language) logo D (Programming Language)

D is a language with C-like syntax and static typing.
  • Strong.app Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-30
  • D (Programming Language) Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-09

Strong.app features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    Strong.app offers an intuitive and clean user interface that makes it easy for users to navigate and use the app effectively.
  • Comprehensive Workout Tracking
    The app allows users to track various aspects of their workouts, including sets, reps, weight, and rest times, enabling detailed progress monitoring.
  • Customizable Workout Routines
    Users can create and customize their own workout routines, which allows for flexibility and personalization in their fitness plans.
  • Extensive Exercise Library
    Strong.app includes a large database of exercises with descriptions and animations, helping users perform movements correctly and discover new exercises.
  • Progress Visualization
    The app provides charts and graphs to visualize progress over time, helping users stay motivated and track their improvements.
  • Cloud Synchronization
    Workout data is synced across devices via the cloud, ensuring that progress is always up-to-date and accessible from different platforms.

Possible disadvantages of Strong.app

  • Cost
    While Strong.app offers a free version, access to premium features requires a subscription, which might be a deterrent for budget-conscious users.
  • Limited Integration
    The app has limited integration with other fitness and health tracking apps, which could be a drawback for users who want a more interconnected fitness ecosystem.
  • Data Entry
    Manual entry of workout data can be time-consuming, particularly for users performing complex routines with multiple exercises.
  • Learning Curve
    New users may experience a learning curve in getting accustomed to all the features and functionalities Strong.app offers.
  • No Guided Workouts
    The app lacks guided workout sessions, which might be a limitation for beginners who prefer step-by-step instructions.

D (Programming Language) features and specs

  • Performance
    D is designed to be a high-performance systems programming language, offering performance comparable to C and C++ through native machine code compilation.
  • Expressiveness
    D features a rich standard library and modern language constructs, such as garbage collection, first-class arrays, and advanced templating, making it easier to write expressive and maintainable code.
  • Memory Safety
    D offers optional garbage collection along with manual memory management. This hybrid approach can help in developing safer applications by reducing memory-related errors.
  • Interoperability
    D can easily interoperate with C API, enabling seamless integration with existing C libraries and systems. It also supports better C++ interoperability compared to other languages.
  • Built-in Unit Testing
    D has built-in support for unit tests, allowing developers to write and run tests as part of the language itself, facilitating test-driven development.
  • Concurrency
    D offers built-in concurrency support with message passing, similar to the actor model found in languages like Erlang, making it easier to write concurrent and parallel programs.

Possible disadvantages of D (Programming Language)

  • Adoption
    D is not as widely adopted as other languages like C, C++, or Java. This limited adoption means fewer libraries, frameworks, and community support.
  • Toolchain Maturity
    While D's compilers and tools have improved over the years, they may still lack the maturity and feature set of more established languages, which can affect developer productivity.
  • Learning Curve
    D's richness and combination of paradigms (such as imperative, object-oriented, and functional programming) can present a steep learning curve for new developers.
  • Garbage Collection
    Although D offers optional garbage collection, its reliance on it for memory safety might be seen as a drawback for real-time system development where deterministic memory management is crucial.
  • Ecosystem
    The ecosystem for D is less vibrant compared to more popular languages, leading to potentially fewer third-party libraries, tools, and resources.
  • Standard Library Documentation
    The standard library documentation can be inconsistent or less comprehensive compared to other languages, making it difficult for developers to fully utilize all features of the language.

Analysis of D (Programming Language)

Overall verdict

  • Overall, D is a solid programming language choice that balances performance with productivity. It may not be as widely adopted as some other languages, but it has a dedicated community and continues to evolve, making it a viable option for various programming tasks.

Why this product is good

  • The D programming language is considered good by many developers for various reasons. It combines the performance and low-level control of C/C++ with the expressive power and ease of use found in modern languages. D offers features like garbage collection, first-class functions, and compile-time function execution, providing both speed and flexibility. Its interoperability with C, the convenience of a powerful standard library (Phobos), and the availability of packages via the DUB package manager make it a practical choice for systems programming, application development, and rapid prototyping.

Recommended for

  • System programming enthusiasts looking for an alternative to C/C++
  • Developers interested in writing high-performance applications
  • Programmers who appreciate modern language features and strong community support
  • Projects requiring seamless C integration
  • Individuals looking for a language that supports easy code maintenance and scalability

Strong.app videos

12 Strong - Movie Review

More videos:

  • Review - 12 Strong Movie Review from a Former Action Guy
  • Review - 12 STRONG MOVIE REVIEW (Starring Chris Hemsworth and Michael Shannon)
  • Review - THE BEST WORKOUT TRACKING APP 2018 -- "Strong"

D (Programming Language) videos

D Language Tutorial

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Strong.app and D (Programming Language))
Health And Fitness
100 100%
0% 0
Programming Language
0 0%
100% 100
Sport & Health
100 100%
0% 0
OOP
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Strong.app and D (Programming Language). For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Strong.app and D (Programming Language)

Strong.app Reviews

9 Best Weightlifting Apps for Strength Training 2023 โ€“ Tried & Tested
The aptly named โ€œStrongโ€ is a simple but effective weightlifting app, offering an intuitive way to track and record your workouts. Available on Apple Watch as well as mobile devices, its value proposition is quite simpleโ€ฆ keep it simple.
Source: fitnessdrum.com
10 best fitness tracker apps for Android
Strong: Exercise Gym Log is a gym log similar to FitNotes. You can input all of your exercise routines and track them over time. It includes some unique tools like a warm-up calculator and tips on how to improve strength from your previous numbers. It has a few extra features from something like FitNotes, but you sacrifice a little bit of ease of use in the process. The UI...

D (Programming Language) Reviews

We have no reviews of D (Programming Language) yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, D (Programming Language) seems to be a lot more popular than Strong.app. While we know about 60 links to D (Programming Language), we've tracked only 3 mentions of Strong.app. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Strong.app mentions (3)

  • Workout Tracker
    I'm using Strava to track endurance work and strong.app for lifting. I'm pretty happy with Strong, but it is a subscription app if you want to save more than three custom workout routines (they also have some of the popular beginner programs pre-populated). Source: over 4 years ago
  • How to lose weight tho you hate intense workouts?
    You should all workouts with a app like strong.app or any other you find. Fitbod also seems to have good stuff now. Check their reviews etc. Source: over 4 years ago
  • I made a community sourced fitness routine database
    Looks like a great app! I run 5/3/1 and this is perfect. Currently I use https://strong.app but I'd love to see a way to see my weekly volume per muscle group. Is that something you are planning to add on Hardy? - Source: Hacker News / about 5 years ago

D (Programming Language) mentions (60)

  • Ask HN: What is your (AI) dev tech stack / workflow? (June 2026)
    I've spent 2 weeks (2-4h per day) to make D language[1] version of Sciter SDK [2] Choice of AI "tooling" was by accident - typed something like "how to define copy constructor in D for custom structure" in Microsoft's Copilot in Edge browser that gives context for AI. The answer was good enough for me and so I went with it further. [1] D language HQ : https://dlang.org/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
  • Rue: Higher level than Rust, lower level than Go
    > Mostly, I am not really trying to compete with C/C++/Rust on speed, but I'm not going to add a GC either. So I'm somewhere in there. Out of curiosity, how would you compare the goals of Rue with something like D[0] or one of the ML-based languages such as OCaml[1]? 0 - https://dlang.org/ 1 - https://ocaml.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • Pony: An actor-model, capabilities-secure, high-performance programming language
    The D language home page has something similar with a drop down with code examples https://dlang.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago
  • Show HN: D++lang โ€“ A new systems programming language with Python-like syntax
    What is this? There's a lot of red flags here. * The name "D" for a programming language was taken in 1999: https://dlang.org/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Koto Programming Language
    >For me the biggest gap in programming languages is a rust like language with a garbage collector, instead of a borrow checker. I cannot agree more that's the much needed sweet spot/Goldilock/etc. Personally I have been advocating this approach for some times. Apparently the language is already widely available and currently has stable and wide compiler support including the venerable GNU compiler suite (GDC). It... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Strong.app and D (Programming Language), you can also consider the following products

Hevy - Simple workout logging, insightful analytics, and a growing community of gym athletes.

C++ - Has imperative, object-oriented and generic programming features, while also providing the facilities for low level memory manipulation

Fitbod - Personalized Strength-Training powered by Machine Learning

Nim (programming language) - The Nim programming language is a concise, fast programming language that compiles to C, C++ and JavaScript.

MyFitnessPal - Track the number of calories that you consume each day with MyFitnessPal. The app also lets you create a diet and track the exercise that you complete each day whether it's walking, running or some other type of program.

V (programming language) - Simple, fast, safe, compiled language for developing maintainable software.