Strict Workflow VS Commit Together by Github

• Productivity Enhancement
  Strict Workflow helps improve productivity by enforcing the Pomodoro Technique, which involves working in focused bursts with scheduled breaks.
• Distraction Blocking
  The extension automatically blocks distracting websites during work sessions, helping users stay focused on their tasks without getting sidetracked.
• Easy to Use
  With a simple interface, Strict Workflow is easy to set up and use, requiring minimal configuration to get started with a structured workflow.
• Customizable Settings
  Users can customize work and break durations as well as add or remove websites from the block list, tailoring the tool to their specific needs.

Possible disadvantages

• Limited Browser Support
  Strict Workflow is primarily designed for Chrome, which means users of other browsers might not be able to utilize the extension.
• Inflexible Break Enforcement
  The extension enforces breaks strictly according to the timer, which can be a drawback for users who might need to work longer stretches or take unscheduled breaks.
• Potential Over-reliance
  Users might become dependent on the extension to maintain productivity, potentially struggling to focus without it.
• Basic Features
  While effective, the extension offers relatively basic features compared to other productivity tools that might offer additional insights or functionalities.

• Enhanced Collaboration
  Commit Together allows multiple authors to be credited in a single commit, which fosters a more collaborative environment and ensures everyone involved receives recognition for their contributions.
• Improved Code Review Process
  With multiple authors clearly listed, reviewers can better understand who contributed to which parts of the code, facilitating more directed questions and discussions.
• Accountability
  By attributing every change to the respective author, teams can easily track who made specific changes, which helps in accountability and understanding the history of a project.
• Efficiency in Pair Programming
  When pair programming, both developers can be credited for their combined effort, streamlining the process of sharing code ownership during collaborative sessions.

Possible disadvantages

• Complex Commit History
  Having multiple authors for a single commit may lead to a more complex commit history, making it harder to pinpoint individual contributions over time.
• Potential Workflow Conflicts
  Teams that are used to single-author commits may experience workflow conflicts or require adjustments in practices to accommodate multi-author contributions.
• Initial Setup Overhead
  Learners and new users might face a learning curve or require additional setup to understand and correctly implement the multi-author commit feature.
• Tooling Compatibility
  Some third-party tools and extensions might not fully support or display multi-author commits, leading to inconsistencies in those environments.

Strict Workflow Demo

More videos

No Commit Together by Github videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

• To Software folks here - how do you take care of your health (eyes and back especially)? Long work hours in a software role is straining my eyes and hurting my back due to sitting in front of the screen for that long. How do you all manage?

  As a reminder for taking breaks at regular intervals. I use this chrome extension https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/strict-workflow/cgmnfnmlficgeijcalkgnnkigkefkbhd . Set it up based on your requirement. You can also go for a... Source: over 4 years ago

• Ask HN: Do you rewrite pull requests?

  There is "Co-authored-by" which is supported on GitHub [1] and seems appropriate if the maintainer is basing the solution on someone's code. [1] https://github.blog/2018-01-29-commit-together-with-co-authors/. - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago