Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

Stillindexed VS git-sizer

Compare Stillindexed VS git-sizer and see what are their differences

Stillindexed

Know before Google does. SEO disaster alerts for clients.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Paid $39 / Monthly (Starter)
Alternatives Is it good?
git-sizer

Compute various size metrics for a Git repository, flagging those that might cause problems - github/git-sizer

Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
Status.io
Status.io is a hosted status page platform for incident communication and uptime monitoring. Keep your customers informed with real-time status updates, maintenance alerts, and transparent system notifications. sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, git-sizer seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 1 time since March 2021.

social mentions
0 vs 1
SEO Tools popularity
100% vs 0%

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Stillindexed
git-sizer
Website stillindexed.com github.com
Pricing
Paid $39 / Monthly (Starter) Official pricing
—
Platforms
Web
—
Company Startup from Turkey · 1 - 9 employees · 2026 —
Listed in
SEO Monitoring SEO Tools Technical SEO Website Monitoring SEO Agency Tools Website Migration +3
Git Code Collaboration Git Tools

About Stillindexed and git-sizer

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

Stillindexed
git-sizer

SEO disaster monitor for freelance technical SEOs and small agencies. Checks robots.txt, meta robots, X-Robots-Tag, canonicals, status codes, redirect chains, title and H1, sitemap, SSL and domain expiry every 15 or 30 minutes per URL, then alerts by Telegram and email with what changed, where,...

Read more about Stillindexed

No description of git-sizer yet.

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Stillindexed 17 features
git-sizer 5 features
  • Indexability monitoring
    Meta robots, X-Robots-Tag header and robots. txt evaluated per URL, so a noindex is caught whether it is in the HTML or a response header.
  • 15 or 30 minute check cadence per monitored URL (Agency / Starter)
    Site-level checks (robots.txt, sitemap, TLS) daily; domain expiry weekly.
  • Canonical and redirect monitoring
    Canonical target, HTTP status, and the full redirect chain, hop by hop.
  • Sitemap health
    Reachable, valid XML, URL count; sitemap index expansion.
  • Certificate Warnings
    SSL certificate and domain expiry warnings via TLS and RDAP.
  • False-positive suppression
    Critical change is confirmed by a second fetch before it alerts; flapping is held back.
  • Alerts by Telegram, Email and Slack
    Stating what changed, where, when, and the before/after. One incident, one alert, one resolved notice.
  • Weekly report per site
    Weekly "we watched, nothing broke" report per site; white-label on Agency so it can be forwarded to a client unedited.
  • Coverage shown
    Checks attempted vs pages actually loaded, per site, per week.
  • No site access needed
    Public URLs only. No Google account, no snippet, no credentials.
  • Bulk URL import
    Paste the list your audit produced; every line gets a decision, nothing is dropped silently.
  • Published crawler identity
    Fixed user agent and allowlisting guide at /bot.
  • Public canary
    A page that breaks itself every four hours and a live log of every check and alert, with measured detection latency.
  • Free checkers
    Indexability, X-Robots-Tag, robots. txt, canonical, redirects, sitemap, title/meta, H1, SSL and domain expiry, bulk (20 URLs), crawler-vs-browser diff.
  • MCP server
    The same checkers callable from Claude Code, Cursor, Codex or any MCP client, no key.
  • SEO skill generator
    SKILL.md for any host with its expected state, platform traps and a re-check runbook.
  • Migration Watch (Agency)
    14-day window with 5-minute cadence and a daily digest around a site migration.
  • Comprehensive Repository Analysis
    git-sizer analyzes many different dimensions of a Git repository including commit count, tree size, blob size, history depth, and reference counts, providing a holistic view of repository health and potential scaling issues.
  • Easy to Use
    The tool is simple to run with minimal setup—just execute it within a git repository—and it produces clear, human-readable output that highlights potential problem areas without requiring complex configuration.
  • Identifies Performance Bottlenecks
    It helps identify specific issues that could degrade Git performance, such as excessively large blobs, deep history, large trees, or too many references, which is valuable before migrating or scaling repositories.
  • Open Source and Maintained by GitHub
    Being an official GitHub project, it benefits from credibility, community trust, and ongoing maintenance, and it is well documented with clear explanations of what each metric means.
  • Useful for Pre-Migration Checks
    It's particularly helpful for teams migrating repositories to new platforms or consolidating repos, as it flags potential issues that could cause problems during migration or with hosting providers' limits.

Possible disadvantages

  • No Automatic Remediation
    git-sizer only identifies and reports issues but does not offer any built-in tools or automated processes to fix problems like large blobs or excessive history depth—users must use separate tools like BFG Repo-Cleaner or git-filter-repo.
  • Output Can Be Overwhelming for Beginners
    While detailed, the output includes many metrics and threshold levels that may be confusing for users unfamiliar with Git internals, requiring some learning curve to fully interpret results.
  • Limited to Local Analysis
    The tool analyzes a local clone of the repository, so it requires users to have a full local copy of the repo (or at least enough history) to get accurate results, which can be time-consuming for very large repositories.
  • No Real-Time Monitoring
    It functions as a one-time analysis tool rather than providing continuous or real-time monitoring of repository health, requiring manual reruns to track changes over time.
  • Command-Line Only Interface
    The tool lacks a graphical user interface, which may be less accessible for users who prefer visual dashboards or are less comfortable with command-line tools.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Stillindexed
git-sizer

No analysis of Stillindexed yet.

Overall verdict

  • git-sizer is a solid, focused open-source tool that effectively analyzes Git repositories to identify size and structural issues that could cause performance problems or hosting limits, making it a valuable diagnostic utility for repository maintenance.

Why this product is good

  • Quickly identifies large blobs, deep histories, and other repository bloat issues that impact performance
  • Simple command-line tool with no complex setup or dependencies required
  • Provides clear, actionable metrics about repository size and structure
  • Backed by GitHub, ensuring credibility and ongoing relevance to Git ecosystem needs
  • Helps proactively catch issues before they cause problems with hosting platforms or clone/fetch performance
  • Open source and actively maintained with community input

Recommended for

  • Repository administrators managing large or growing codebases
  • Teams migrating repositories to new hosting platforms with size limits
  • Developers troubleshooting slow clone, fetch, or checkout operations
  • DevOps engineers auditing repository health before major infrastructure changes
  • Organizations enforcing repository size policies or best practices
  • Anyone dealing with repositories that have accumulated large binary files or excessive history over time

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Stillindexed
git-sizer
100% 100%
SEO Tools
0% 0%
0% 0%
Git
100% 100%
100% 100%
SEO Monitoring
0% 0%
0% 0%
Code Collaboration
100% 100%

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing Stillindexed and git-sizer.

What makes your product unique?

Stillindexed's answer

It publishes its own evidence instead of adjectives. A public canary page breaks itself on a fixed schedule every four hours, and the log at api.stillindexed.com/canary/log shows every check and alert with the measured detection latency (median 16 minutes to detect, 18 to alert, on the slower plan). The crawler's identity and limits are published at /bot. Every check reads what the server actually returned, meta robots, X-Robots-Tag headers, robots.txt, canonicals, redirect chains, so a noindex in a response header is caught, not just one in the HTML. Pricing is public, there is no sales call, and no site access is required.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

Stillindexed's answer

Because it interprets a URL's indexability automatically at a self-serve price. Generic change monitors (Visualping, Hexowatch, changedetection.io) diff whatever selector you configure and leave you to decide what the change means. Audit suites (Screaming Frog, Sitebulb, Ahrefs, Semrush) crawl on a schedule you read later. The SEO-aware monitors that do interpret changes start at $199 a month (SEORadar) or hide pricing behind a sales process (Conductor Monitoring). Stillindexed checks every 15 or 30 minutes, confirms a critical change with a second fetch before alerting, sends the before/after to Telegram and email, and starts at $39 a month for 15 sites. When Little Warden or Oh Dear fits better, the comparison pages on the site say so.

How would you describe the primary audience of your product?

Stillindexed's answer

Freelance technical SEO consultants and agencies of two to ten people who manage 5 to 50 client sites on retainer, especially around site migrations. Their problem is finding out about a broken noindex, robots.txt or canonical from the client three days late. It is not built for enterprises, in-house teams at large companies, or developers who want uptime or cron monitoring.

What's the story behind your product?

Stillindexed's answer

An accidental noindex or robots.txt block typically sits live for 24 to 72 hours before anyone notices. Search Console reports it after the indexing damage, and its reports are often days behind. Recovery takes one to three weeks after the fix, and for an agency the cost is the client relationship. Existing tools were either enterprise crawlers with sales-led pricing, or generic page-diff monitors with no SEO semantics. Stillindexed was built as the narrow thing in between: plain HTTP fetches of the directives Google's indexing decision trusts first, on a short cycle, with an alert that names the change. It was built by one person and is designed to stay maintainable by one person, which is why it does one job and publishes its own proof.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

Stillindexed's answer

Go (stdlib net/http) for the API and the checker worker, PostgreSQL 17 with River for job scheduling, Astro for the marketing site, Vite and React with TypeScript for the app, plain CSS, Docker Compose behind Traefik, Polar for billing, Telegram and email for alerts.

User comments

Share your experience with using Stillindexed and git-sizer. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Stillindexed 0 mentions
git-sizer 1 mention

Tracking Stillindexed since Sep 2026.

  • how to keep github repos small?
    Also there’s a cool project from GitHub you can use to help understand the size of git’s objects in your git repo https://github.com/github/git-sizer. This might help you determine what the best cloning strategy could be. Source: almost 5 years ago

Alternatives to Stillindexed and git-sizer

When comparing Stillindexed and git-sizer, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...