Stacky VS dmenu

• Open Source
  Stacky is open source, allowing developers to contribute to and enhance the project according to their needs.
• Community Support
  As a GitHub-hosted project, it benefits from community collaboration, where users can share improvements, report issues, and request new features.
• Free to Use
  Being an open-source tool, Stacky can be used for free, which is advantageous for developers and companies looking to cut costs.
• Customizable
  Developers have the ability to fork the project and customize it to better fit their specific use cases and requirements.

Possible disadvantages

• Lack of Documentation
  Stacky may not have comprehensive documentation, making it challenging for new users to understand and implement the tool effectively.
• Potential for Bugs
  As with many open-source projects, there may be less rigorous testing, leading to the potential presence of unresolved bugs or issues.
• Limited Features
  Depending on the project's current state, it may have fewer features compared to more established alternatives, limiting its utility for some use cases.
• Maintenance Uncertainty
  The project's future updates and maintenance depend on the community or the project owner's interest, which could be inconsistent.

• Lightweight
  dmenu is known for its minimal use of system resources, ensuring fast performance even on older hardware.
• Flexibility
  dmenu can be easily integrated into scripts and customized to fit specific workflows, making it adaptable to various user needs.
• Minimalism
  Its minimalist design aligns with the philosophy of simplicity and efficiency, allowing for a straightforward user experience.
• Keyboard Driven
  dmenu is designed for efficiency with keyboard input, enabling quick navigation and selection without the need for a mouse.
• Scriptability
  Due to its simplicity and flexibility, it can be easily scripted and paired with other command-line tools for extended functionality.

Possible disadvantages

• Limited Features
  Compared to more comprehensive launchers, dmenu lacks advanced features such as fuzzy searching or GUI configuration options.
• Steep Learning Curve
  For users unfamiliar with command-line tools or scripting, setting up and customizing dmenu can be challenging.
• Aesthetic Limitations
  The minimalist interface may not appeal to users who prefer more visually rich interactions or customization options.
• Dependence on External Scripts
  To extend its functionality, users often need to rely on additional scripts, which might require extra maintenance and setup.
• No Built-in Menu Structure
  dmenu does not support a predefined hierarchical menu structure out of the box, which might be a drawback for users looking for an organized menu system.

Vertical Gardening with Mr. Stacky set up, seed planting, and review.

More videos

dmenu: Your own Custom Script Menus!

More videos

• My multi-monitor desktop setup (not pretty but useful)

  Programs (mostly free/sharewares): Google desktop apps: Google Chrome or MS Edge or whatever you use as a browser. And if you're lazy: https://chromeless.app/ to create the apps. Microsoft PowerToys:... Source: over 3 years ago

• Bspwm + Sxhkd + Polybar

  For dmenu modifications go to http://tools.suckless.org/dmenu/ and read about patching, or use some patched versions from github, like Luke Smiths https://github.com/LukeSmithxyz/dmenu. Source: almost 3 years ago

• Textual Web: TUIs for the Web

  Some features are nice to have. Give dmenu [0] a try, pipe it into other CLI utils and see how useful it can be to have drop-downs sometimes. [0] https://tools.suckless.org/dmenu/. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago

• Kera Desktop: open-source, cross-platform, web-based desktop environment

  This is a wonderful project! I've been thinking a lot about making such a unified desktop stack for a while now; web technology has matured to the point where I think it's feasible to build a complete environment a la Smalltalk/Symbolics... - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago

View more