
Simple Client Onboarding and Verification

Oryxblue
Breezy.hr
Trakstar
Recruitee
Teamtailor
TalentLyft
Greenhouse
Oryx helps growing teams run structured, consistent hiring processes - without enterprise overhead. Free to start. No training required.

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | stackgo.io | oryx.so |
| Pricing | ||
| Company | — | Startup from Switzerland · 1 - 9 employees · 2025 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of StackGo yet.
Hiring at a growing company usually breaks at the interview. Roles pile up, feedback scatters across inboxes, and the decision goes to whoever sounded most confident in the debrief. Oryx fixes that. Oryx is an applicant tracking system built around the interview itself, not just the pipeline. You...
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing StackGo and Oryx.
Oryx's answer:
the first or only HR/People person at a US SMB of roughly 20 to 300 employees, sitting between 5 and 15 open roles, with hiring managers who refuse to follow a process and a CEO who wants faster, better hires without buying Greenhouse.
Oryx's answer:
Bubble.io I Next JS
Oryx's answer:
How a failed hiring service became a SaaS product
The problem we kept seeing
I've watched good companies make bad hires over and over. Not because they didn't care, but because the hiring team walked into interviews without knowing what they were actually looking for. No structure, no alignment, no consistency. Just vibes and gut feel. The result: rough candidate experiences, misaligned expectations, and mis-hires that cost way more than anyone wants to admit.
We tried to solve it as a service first
Before oryx was a product, it was a hiring service. We called it HaaS, Hiring as a Service. We ran structured hiring processes for SMBs end to end: interview guides, scorecards, hiring manager alignment, the works. It worked. Clients got better hires. We got early revenue. But services don't scale. Revenue was inconsistent, delivery was time-intensive, and we hit a ceiling fast.
The pivot nobody planned
At some point we realized our clients weren't just buying outcomes. They were buying the process we'd built in-house. The interview guides, the scorecards, the way we got hiring managers to actually agree on what they wanted before talking to a single candidate. So we asked a simple question: what if they could just use the tool directly? That was the moment Oryx went from a service to a product.
What Oryx actually is
Most ATS tools are built around pipeline tracking. Move candidate from applied to interviewed to offered. That's it. We built Oryx around the interview itself, because that's where hires are won or lost. Structured interview guides, scorecards, and hiring manager alignment workflows. A professional hiring process without the enterprise overhead. It's for SMBs, companies with 20 to 300 employees who are serious about hiring but don't need (or want to pay for) Workday.
Oryx's answer:
Simplicity, UX, structured interviewing process built into customizable workflows
Oryx's answer:
Value for money - by far the most cost effective, with very fair pricing that is not difficult to follow, or forecast.
Share your experience with using StackGo and Oryx. For example, how are they different and which one is better?