SquareSpace VS Apache HTTP Server

SquareSpace Reviews

1. Team Wisdom

   | Small business Owner at SmokeHub | over 1 year ago
   Offers step-by-step video training to build website

   It has a sleek interface that makes it a simple platform to use.

   Squarespace enables non-programmers to create user-friendly websites. To assist novice users, the site offers step-by-step video training, which is amazing...

   🏁 Competitors: QPe

Apache HTTP Server Reviews

SquareSpace mentions (36)

• Best website builder?

  I highly recommend Squarespace, DM me if you want me to share some of my client's finished websites. Also, I am happy to answer any of your questions for free. Source: 11 months ago

• Squarespace is Hijacking my links

  I recently moved my website to squarespace and have added several text boxes with links to other pages on the site. However after clicking save and then testing the links, they always resolve back to squarespace.com. Upon reviewing the links they have been converted back to squarespace. Any advice? Source: 12 months ago

• Blogging help: How to start from a scratch?

  Or, you can try something like squarespace.com as well. Source: about 1 year ago

• SNI Dynamic Certificate

  I'm pulling my hair out here. Websites like wix.com, squarespace.com ...etc; can generate websites on the fly and still use SSL on every one of the millions of custom domains. Source: about 1 year ago

• Horse pics: now with anatomical cutaway!

  Are you selling this on your squarespace.com account? Source: about 1 year ago

Apache HTTP Server mentions (50)

• The 2024 Web Hosting Report

  Single-page applications (SPAs) existed before S3, but given that you still had to set up, scale, and maintain servers using something like Apache or NGINX in order to serve them, the advantages for “Ops” or “DevOps” were not so different to running a “real server” with a language like PHP, python, or Java. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

• Starlight vs. Docusaurus for building documentation

  Both Docusaurus and Starlight generate static sites. This means that theoretically, they can be deployed on any platform that supports deploying static sites (like Apache or NGINX). But both of them provide a significantly better developer experience if we deploy on their recommended platforms. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

• BCHS stack: BSD, C, httpd, SQLite

  Simiplicity is nice, but there are reasons why Perl and PHP were the popular choices for web stacks in the early 2000's--they are faster and easier to develop with than C and likely safer than C too. Mod_perl (https://perl.apache.org/) and mod_php (https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/plugins/servlet/mobile?contentId=115522403#content/view/115522403) helped to make Apache httpd (https://httpd.apache.org/) the... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago

• Apache HTTP Server: An Overview of the Open Source Web Server for Multiple Platforms

  The Apache HTTP Server project was initially launched in 1995 by a group of web developers and administrators who sought to improve upon the existing web server software available at the time. The project has since evolved into a collaborative effort, with contributors from around the world working together to maintain and enhance the server. Today, the Apache HTTP Server is managed by the Apache Software... Source: about 1 year ago

• Selfmade PVE-Rack

  Apache websites of friends and acquaintances. Source: about 1 year ago