
Hugo
Publii
Sitepins
Quarto
Zim Wiki
Here.com
TinaCMS
Spinal CMS is a beautiful and minimal CMS for static site generators. Nothing to install, but powered by GitHub. Built for small teams that value human quality over automated quantity.

Bludit
WonderCMS
HTMLy
PhileCMS
Grav
GetSimple CMS
Backdrop CMS
Flat file CMS for building simple websites and blogs.
Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Spinal CMS seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 5 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | spinalcms.com | boidcms.github.io |
| Pricing | ||
| Company | Startup from The Netherlands · 1 - 9 employees · 2022 | 2022 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


Spinal is a minimal and beautiful CMS for static site generators, from Jekyll, to Docusaurus and Bridgetown. Create content alone or with your team. Schedule and publish without any Git(Hub) knowledge. Features like the calendar provides a birds-eye overview of all scheduled and published...
BoidCMS is a free and open-source flat file CMS for building simple websites and blogs in seconds, developed using PHP and uses JSON as a database.
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


No features have been listed yet.
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing Spinal CMS and BoidCMS.
Spinal CMS's answer
No tedious set up, connect your GitHub repo and you and your team are publishing on your site in minutes.
BoidCMS's answer:
BoidCMS stands out for its unique combination of simplicity, flexibility, and robustness.
Spinal CMS's answer
For 4+ years Spinal has a small, bootstrapped team, helped hundreds of small businesses with its easy to setup dashboard, beautiful and minimal UI and features built for teams that value human content over automated slop.
Spinal CMS's answer
Small bushiness, mostly software/SaaS companies.
Share your experience with using Spinal CMS and BoidCMS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


There's a lot of ways to convert MD to HTML, but fewer tools to collaborate with non-devs to edit and maintain those markdown files. I've been considering Spinal[0] (no association) to bridge that gap, any others I should be looking at?... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
There are a few SSG that come with a (local, ie. Run it locally) CMS. A better option, imo, is to choose any SSG you like, written in a language you know and add Spinal as the CMS. Makes editing content as simple as WordPress. If you... Source: over 3 years ago
Just want to offer that at Spinal (a CMS for static site generators, like the ones mentioned in the comments) we offer a free tier for open source projects. Feel free to reach for any questions. ✌️. Source: over 3 years ago
Tracking BoidCMS since Aug 2022.
When comparing Spinal CMS and BoidCMS, you can also consider the following products.

Hugo is a general-purpose website framework for generating static web pages.
Compare Hugo to Spinal CMS or BoidCMS:

Bludit is a web application to build your own website or blog in seconds, it's completely free and open source. Markdown support.
Compare Bludit to Spinal CMS or BoidCMS:


WonderCMS is the smallest flat file CMS. Completely free, open source, privacy oriented for over 12 years.
Compare WonderCMS to Spinal CMS or BoidCMS:

An open-source headless CMS for websites that live in Git.
Compare Sitepins to Spinal CMS or BoidCMS:

HTMLy is an open source databaseless blogging platform. A Flat-File Blog and Flat-File CMS written in PHP prioritizes simplicity and speed.
Compare HTMLy to Spinal CMS or BoidCMS: