Software Alternatives & Startups

speedtest-cli VS Graphwake

Compare speedtest-cli VS Graphwake and see what are their differences

speedtest-cli

Test your download speed using SpeedTest on the command-line

Rating
0 reviews
Graphwake

Graphwake maps who consumes each endpoint of your OpenAPI specs, shows the impact of every breaking change and alerts only the affected teams, before the change merges.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source Paid Free trial $99 / Monthly

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, speedtest-cli seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 13 times since March 2021.

social mentions
13 vs 0
Developer Tools popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
90 vs 4

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

speedtest-cli
Graphwake
Website github.com graphwake.com
Pricing —
Open source Paid Free trial $99 / Monthly Official pricing
Company — 2026
Listed in

About speedtest-cli and Graphwake

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

speedtest-cli
Graphwake

No description of speedtest-cli yet.

Graphwake shows who consumes each endpoint of your OpenAPI specs and tells only those teams when a change is about to break them. When one team changes its API, the teams that call it often don't hear about it until something breaks in production. Diff tools tell you what changed, and...

Read more about Graphwake

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

speedtest-cli 5 features
Graphwake 9 features
  • Open Source
    Speedtest-cli is open-source, meaning the source code is freely available for anyone to inspect, modify, and enhance.
  • Command Line Interface
    Allows users to run internet speed tests from the command line, which can be useful for automation, scripting, and use on headless servers.
  • Platform Independent
    Runs on multiple systems including Windows, macOS, and Linux, making it versatile for use across different environments.
  • Integration Capabilities
    Can be easily integrated with other applications and monitoring systems for automated performance tracking and reporting.
  • No Ads
    Unlike web-based speed test services, speedtest-cli does not display any advertisements, offering a cleaner user experience.

Possible disadvantages

  • Requires Terminal Knowledge
    Users need to be familiar with the command line interface, which might be a barrier for those who are accustomed to graphical user interfaces.
  • No Graphical Output
    Lacks a visual representation of the speed test results, which can be a disadvantage for users who prefer graphical data.
  • Limited Server Selection
    Automated server selection might not always choose the best server for testing, potentially affecting the accuracy of results.
  • Dependencies
    Speedtest-cli relies on Python and the 'pip' package manager, which may require additional setup steps for some users.
  • Feature Limitations
    Not all features of the web-based Speedtest service (like detailed historical data) are available in the CLI version.
  • Breaking change alerts
    Detects breaking changes in your OpenAPI specs and alerts only the teams that call the changed endpoints.
  • Alert channels
    Slack, Microsoft Teams and email. Each team picks its own channel.
  • Impact score
    Every pull request gets an explainable 0–100 score, plus the list of affected teams and what breaks for each one.
  • Service graph
    A map of who owns and who consumes every endpoint. Orphan endpoints are flagged.
  • Endpoint subscriptions
    Consumer teams subscribe to the endpoints they call. Producers don't maintain a consumer list.
  • CI/CD integration
    One step in GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Azure DevOps or Jenkins checks every pull request.
  • Spec URL monitoring
    Watches a published OpenAPI spec URL and checks it every 30 minutes.
  • Change history
    Append-only record of API changes, subscriptions and ownership changes for incident reviews.
  • Security
    Reads your OpenAPI spec, not your code. Nothing runs in production. SSO with Entra ID on Pro.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

speedtest-cli
Graphwake

Overall verdict

  • Speedtest-cli is a reliable and effective tool for quickly assessing internet speed from the command line. It is well-regarded in the tech community for personal use, troubleshooting, and integration into network monitoring solutions.

Why this product is good

  • Speedtest-cli is a popular command-line tool that allows users to measure Internet bandwidth performance by using the Speedtest.net infrastructure. It is favored for its simplicity, ease of use, and ability to function on systems without a graphical user interface. It supports automated testing through scripts, making it suitable for batch processing and integration into monitoring systems.

Recommended for

  • System administrators who need a tool to monitor bandwidth performance across different machines.
  • Developers who require automation of speed tests in scripts.
  • Users who prefer command-line interfaces instead of graphical user interfaces.
  • Individuals seeking a lightweight and straightforward way to test internet speed without additional software installations.

No analysis of Graphwake yet.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

speedtest-cli 2 videos + Add
Graphwake 0 videos + Add

Testing Internet Bandwidth From The Terminal Using Speedtest-cli

More videos

  • - Test internet bandwidth using speedtest-cli

No Graphwake videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
speedtest-cli
Graphwake
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing speedtest-cli and Graphwake.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

Graphwake's answer:

  • Backend: .NET 10 API and workers
  • Database: PostgreSQL with row-level security per tenant
  • Frontend: Next.js and React
  • Breaking change detection: oasdiff
  • CI agent: Go, for GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Azure DevOps, Bitbucket Pipelines and Jenkins
  • Hosting: Docker

What makes your product unique?

Graphwake's answer:

Most API tools stop at the diff: they tell you what changed. Graphwake also knows who calls each endpoint.

  • Team-level dependency map: who owns and who consumes every endpoint
  • Routed alerts: only the consumer teams that call a changed endpoint are alerted, in Slack, Microsoft Teams or email. Every other team stays quiet.
  • Impact score: every pull request gets an explainable 0–100 score and the list of teams it affects
  • Append-only history of changes, subscriptions and ownership, for incident reviews

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

Graphwake's answer:

  • Diff tools (oasdiff, Optic) show what changed and reach the pull request author. Graphwake reaches the consumer teams it breaks.
  • Docs and changelog tools (Bump.sh) broadcast to everyone. Graphwake sends each alert only to the teams that call the changed endpoint.
  • Contract testing (Pact, Specmatic) needs test code from every consumer. Graphwake works from the OpenAPI specs you already have.

Setup is one CI step or a spec URL. Producers don't maintain a consumer list. Graphwake reads your spec, not your code, and nothing runs in production.

How would you describe the primary audience of your product?

Graphwake's answer:

Engineering organisations with 20+ developers, several teams that depend on each other's APIs, and OpenAPI specs.

  • Buyers: engineering leads, CTOs, VPs of Engineering and platform teams who want fewer incidents caused by cross-team API changes
  • Consumer-team developers: want to hear about a breaking change before it reaches production
  • Producer-team developers: want to ship changes knowing exactly who they will affect

What's the story behind your product?

Graphwake's answer:

I built Graphwake after another team changed an API my app depended on without telling us, and we found out in production.

The change itself was fine. The problem was that the news never reached the people it would break:

  • Producer teams can't keep an accurate list of who calls each endpoint
  • Company-wide announcement channels are too noisy for anyone to read

Graphwake fixes that. Every endpoint knows its consumers, and "every alert has an address"

User comments

Share your experience with using speedtest-cli and Graphwake. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

speedtest-cli 13 mentions
Graphwake 0 mentions
  • CLI Tools every Developer should know
    Or, you can follow the installation instructions on the official GitHub repository: SpeedTest-CLI Installation Guide. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • Routing table confusion, or did Kirkland move to Kansas?
    That's a community cli client https://github.com/sivel/speedtest-cli rather than the official cli client https://www.speedtest.net/apps/cli. Source: over 3 years ago
  • running script via cron does not provide full output
    If you read the docs for Speedtest-CLI you will see that the program timeouts after 10 seconds. Try using this for default timeout of 1 minute and also redirect errors to the same file. Speedtest-cli --timeout 60 >>... Source: almost 4 years ago

View more

Tracking Graphwake since Nov 2026.

Alternatives to speedtest-cli and Graphwake

When comparing speedtest-cli and Graphwake, you can also consider the following products.