Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

Speedtest.net VS Graphwake

Compare Speedtest.net VS Graphwake and see what are their differences

Speedtest.net

Test your Internet connection bandwidth to locations around the world with this interactive broadband speed test from Ookla

Rating
0 reviews
Promote on VibeVoted
Alternatives Is it good?
Graphwake

Graphwake maps who consumes each endpoint of your OpenAPI specs, shows the impact of every breaking change and alerts only the affected teams, before the change merges.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source Paid Free trial $99 / Monthly
Promote on VibeVoted
Support its launch · 0 supporters
Alternatives Is it good?
PDFGate
Generate, process, and sign documents with a single API. sponsored

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Speedtest.net seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 2939 times since March 2021.

social mentions
2,939 vs 0
Speed Test popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
156 vs 4

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Speedtest.net
Graphwake
Website speedtest.net graphwake.com
Pricing —
Open source Paid Free trial $99 / Monthly Official pricing
Company Startup from the United States 2026
Listed in
Speed Test Networking Developer Tools Internet +1
API Tools Developer Tools DevOps Tools Continuous Integration Continuous Deployment API Documentation Monitoring Tools Team Collaboration +5

About Speedtest.net and Graphwake

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

Speedtest.net
Graphwake

No description of Speedtest.net yet.

Graphwake shows who consumes each endpoint of your OpenAPI specs and tells only those teams when a change is about to break them. When one team changes its API, the teams that call it often don't hear about it until something breaks in production. Diff tools tell you what changed, and...

Read more about Graphwake

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Speedtest.net 6 features
Graphwake 9 features
  • User-Friendly Interface
    Speedtest.net offers a straightforward, visually appealing interface that makes it easy for users of all technical skill levels to measure their internet speed quickly.
  • Global Server Network
    The platform has a vast network of test servers around the world, ensuring accurate results by connecting to the closest server to minimize latency and other external factors.
  • Detailed Results
    Provides comprehensive details including download, upload speeds, and ping, giving users a full picture of their internet performance.
  • Mobile App Availability
    Speedtest.net offers mobile applications for both iOS and Android, allowing users to test their internet speed on various devices.
  • Graphical Data Representation
    The service includes visual representations of speed test data over time, aiding users in understanding their internet performance history.
  • Comparative Data
    Users can compare their results with average speeds for their ISP, city, or country, providing context for their performance.

Possible disadvantages

  • Advertisements
    The free version of Speedtest.net includes ads, which can be distracting and potentially slow down the webpage.
  • Limited Free Features
    Advanced features, such as detailed analysis and tracking, are only available in the premium version.
  • Potential Bias Toward ISPs
    Some critics argue that Speedtest.net may show favorable results for certain ISPs due to partnerships and server locations.
  • Data Privacy
    As a third-party service, there are concerns about how user data is collected, stored, and potentially shared with advertisers or partners.
  • Single-Purpose
    Speedtest.net focuses purely on speed testing and doesn't offer broader network diagnostics tools, limiting its utility for more in-depth troubleshooting.
  • Requires Strong Internet for Accurate Results
    In cases of very poor connectivity, the results may not be accurate or the test might fail to complete, leaving users without valuable insights.
  • Breaking change alerts
    Detects breaking changes in your OpenAPI specs and alerts only the teams that call the changed endpoints.
  • Alert channels
    Slack, Microsoft Teams and email. Each team picks its own channel.
  • Impact score
    Every pull request gets an explainable 0–100 score, plus the list of affected teams and what breaks for each one.
  • Service graph
    A map of who owns and who consumes every endpoint. Orphan endpoints are flagged.
  • Endpoint subscriptions
    Consumer teams subscribe to the endpoints they call. Producers don't maintain a consumer list.
  • CI/CD integration
    One step in GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Azure DevOps or Jenkins checks every pull request.
  • Spec URL monitoring
    Watches a published OpenAPI spec URL and checks it every 30 minutes.
  • Change history
    Append-only record of API changes, subscriptions and ownership changes for incident reviews.
  • Security
    Reads your OpenAPI spec, not your code. Nothing runs in production. SSO with Entra ID on Pro.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Speedtest.net
Graphwake

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Speedtest.net is considered a good tool for testing internet speeds due to its reliability, ease of use, and comprehensive features.

Why this product is good

  • Speedtest.net is a well-known tool for measuring internet connection speeds, providing accurate data on download and upload speeds and ping. It has a large network of testing servers worldwide, which helps in getting reliable results. The user interface is straightforward and easy to use, even for non-technical users. It also offers historical data tracking and is available on multiple platforms, including web, mobile apps, and APIs for integration into other services.

Recommended for

    Individuals who want to check their internet speed quickly and easily, IT professionals who need to diagnose network issues, developers who require speed testing integration into their applications, and businesses that need consistent and reliable network performance assessment.

No analysis of Graphwake yet.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Speedtest.net
Graphwake
100% 100%
Speed Test
0% 0%
0% 0%
DevOps Tools
100% 100%
100% 100%
Developer Tools
0% 0%
0% 0%
API Tools
100% 100%

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing Speedtest.net and Graphwake.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

Graphwake's answer:

  • Backend: .NET 10 API and workers
  • Database: PostgreSQL with row-level security per tenant
  • Frontend: Next.js and React
  • Breaking change detection: oasdiff
  • CI agent: Go, for GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Azure DevOps, Bitbucket Pipelines and Jenkins
  • Hosting: Docker

What makes your product unique?

Graphwake's answer:

Most API tools stop at the diff: they tell you what changed. Graphwake also knows who calls each endpoint.

  • Team-level dependency map: who owns and who consumes every endpoint
  • Routed alerts: only the consumer teams that call a changed endpoint are alerted, in Slack, Microsoft Teams or email. Every other team stays quiet.
  • Impact score: every pull request gets an explainable 0–100 score and the list of teams it affects
  • Append-only history of changes, subscriptions and ownership, for incident reviews

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

Graphwake's answer:

  • Diff tools (oasdiff, Optic) show what changed and reach the pull request author. Graphwake reaches the consumer teams it breaks.
  • Docs and changelog tools (Bump.sh) broadcast to everyone. Graphwake sends each alert only to the teams that call the changed endpoint.
  • Contract testing (Pact, Specmatic) needs test code from every consumer. Graphwake works from the OpenAPI specs you already have.

Setup is one CI step or a spec URL. Producers don't maintain a consumer list. Graphwake reads your spec, not your code, and nothing runs in production.

How would you describe the primary audience of your product?

Graphwake's answer:

Engineering organisations with 20+ developers, several teams that depend on each other's APIs, and OpenAPI specs.

  • Buyers: engineering leads, CTOs, VPs of Engineering and platform teams who want fewer incidents caused by cross-team API changes
  • Consumer-team developers: want to hear about a breaking change before it reaches production
  • Producer-team developers: want to ship changes knowing exactly who they will affect

What's the story behind your product?

Graphwake's answer:

I built Graphwake after another team changed an API my app depended on without telling us, and we found out in production.

The change itself was fine. The problem was that the news never reached the people it would break:

  • Producer teams can't keep an accurate list of who calls each endpoint
  • Company-wide announcement channels are too noisy for anyone to read

Graphwake fixes that. Every endpoint knows its consumers, and "every alert has an address"

User comments

Share your experience with using Speedtest.net and Graphwake. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Speedtest.net 2939 mentions
Graphwake 0 mentions

View more

Tracking Graphwake since Nov 2026.

Alternatives to Speedtest.net and Graphwake

When comparing Speedtest.net and Graphwake, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...