Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

LibreSpeed VS Graphwake

Compare LibreSpeed VS Graphwake and see what are their differences

LibreSpeed

Self-hosted Speedtest for HTML5. Easy setup, examples, configurable, mobile friendly.

Rating
0 reviews
Promote on VibeVoted
Alternatives Is it good?
Graphwake

Graphwake maps who consumes each endpoint of your OpenAPI specs, shows the impact of every breaking change and alerts only the affected teams, before the change merges.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source Paid Free trial $99 / Monthly
Promote on VibeVoted
Support its launch · 0 supporters
Alternatives Is it good?
PDFGate
Generate, process, and sign documents with a single API. sponsored

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, LibreSpeed seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 34 times since March 2021.

social mentions
34 vs 0
Speed Test popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
62 vs 4

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

LibreSpeed
Graphwake
Website github.com graphwake.com
Pricing —
Open source Paid Free trial $99 / Monthly Official pricing
Company — 2026
Listed in
Speed Test Networking Internet Developer Tools +1
API Tools Developer Tools DevOps Tools Continuous Integration Continuous Deployment API Documentation Monitoring Tools Team Collaboration +5

About LibreSpeed and Graphwake

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

LibreSpeed
Graphwake

No description of LibreSpeed yet.

Graphwake shows who consumes each endpoint of your OpenAPI specs and tells only those teams when a change is about to break them. When one team changes its API, the teams that call it often don't hear about it until something breaks in production. Diff tools tell you what changed, and...

Read more about Graphwake

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

LibreSpeed 5 features
Graphwake 9 features
  • Open Source
    LibreSpeed is open-source software, meaning anyone can view, modify, and distribute the code. This transparency helps in auditing the code for security issues and allows for community-driven improvements.
  • Free to Use
    LibreSpeed does not require any licensing fees, making it a cost-effective solution for both personal and commercial use.
  • Customizable
    Users can modify the source code to suit their specific needs, whether it is the user interface or the functionality of the speed test.
  • Self-Hosted
    Being self-hosted, LibreSpeed provides more control over data privacy and security, as users can run it on their own servers.
  • No External Dependencies
    LibreSpeed is built to work without relying on third-party services or external dependencies, enhancing reliability and independence.

Possible disadvantages

  • Technical Expertise Required
    Setting up and customizing LibreSpeed may require a good degree of technical knowledge, particularly in web development and server management.
  • Maintenance
    Self-hosting LibreSpeed implies that the user is responsible for maintaining the server and updating the software, which could be cumbersome for some.
  • Limited Community Support
    Although it is open source, LibreSpeed may not have as large a user base or as robust community support as more established, proprietary solutions.
  • No Built-In Analytics
    LibreSpeed does not come with built-in advanced analytics or reporting capabilities, so users might need to integrate it with other analytics tools for deeper insights.
  • Initial Setup Complexity
    Configuring the server and ensuring that it works optimally can be complex, particularly for users who are not familiar with server-side configurations.
  • Breaking change alerts
    Detects breaking changes in your OpenAPI specs and alerts only the teams that call the changed endpoints.
  • Alert channels
    Slack, Microsoft Teams and email. Each team picks its own channel.
  • Impact score
    Every pull request gets an explainable 0–100 score, plus the list of affected teams and what breaks for each one.
  • Service graph
    A map of who owns and who consumes every endpoint. Orphan endpoints are flagged.
  • Endpoint subscriptions
    Consumer teams subscribe to the endpoints they call. Producers don't maintain a consumer list.
  • CI/CD integration
    One step in GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Azure DevOps or Jenkins checks every pull request.
  • Spec URL monitoring
    Watches a published OpenAPI spec URL and checks it every 30 minutes.
  • Change history
    Append-only record of API changes, subscriptions and ownership changes for incident reviews.
  • Security
    Reads your OpenAPI spec, not your code. Nothing runs in production. SSO with Entra ID on Pro.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

LibreSpeed 2 videos + Add
Graphwake 0 videos + Add

Self-host your own internet speed test with LibreSpeed!

More videos

  • - Tech Demo How To : Self Hosted Speed Test : libreSpeed

No Graphwake videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
LibreSpeed
Graphwake
100% 100%
Speed Test
0% 0%
0% 0%
DevOps Tools
100% 100%
100% 100%
Developer Tools
0% 0%
0% 0%
API Tools
100% 100%

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing LibreSpeed and Graphwake.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

Graphwake's answer:

  • Backend: .NET 10 API and workers
  • Database: PostgreSQL with row-level security per tenant
  • Frontend: Next.js and React
  • Breaking change detection: oasdiff
  • CI agent: Go, for GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Azure DevOps, Bitbucket Pipelines and Jenkins
  • Hosting: Docker

What makes your product unique?

Graphwake's answer:

Most API tools stop at the diff: they tell you what changed. Graphwake also knows who calls each endpoint.

  • Team-level dependency map: who owns and who consumes every endpoint
  • Routed alerts: only the consumer teams that call a changed endpoint are alerted, in Slack, Microsoft Teams or email. Every other team stays quiet.
  • Impact score: every pull request gets an explainable 0–100 score and the list of teams it affects
  • Append-only history of changes, subscriptions and ownership, for incident reviews

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

Graphwake's answer:

  • Diff tools (oasdiff, Optic) show what changed and reach the pull request author. Graphwake reaches the consumer teams it breaks.
  • Docs and changelog tools (Bump.sh) broadcast to everyone. Graphwake sends each alert only to the teams that call the changed endpoint.
  • Contract testing (Pact, Specmatic) needs test code from every consumer. Graphwake works from the OpenAPI specs you already have.

Setup is one CI step or a spec URL. Producers don't maintain a consumer list. Graphwake reads your spec, not your code, and nothing runs in production.

How would you describe the primary audience of your product?

Graphwake's answer:

Engineering organisations with 20+ developers, several teams that depend on each other's APIs, and OpenAPI specs.

  • Buyers: engineering leads, CTOs, VPs of Engineering and platform teams who want fewer incidents caused by cross-team API changes
  • Consumer-team developers: want to hear about a breaking change before it reaches production
  • Producer-team developers: want to ship changes knowing exactly who they will affect

What's the story behind your product?

Graphwake's answer:

I built Graphwake after another team changed an API my app depended on without telling us, and we found out in production.

The change itself was fine. The problem was that the news never reached the people it would break:

  • Producer teams can't keep an accurate list of who calls each endpoint
  • Company-wide announcement channels are too noisy for anyone to read

Graphwake fixes that. Every endpoint knows its consumers, and "every alert has an address"

User comments

Share your experience with using LibreSpeed and Graphwake. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

LibreSpeed 34 mentions
Graphwake 0 mentions
  • I open-sourced the internet speed data collected by my speed-test site
    I run internetspeedtest.net, a free, no-signup speed test built on the open-source LibreSpeed engine. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • Ask HN: Is Comcast ripping me off and how can I prove it?
    Try hosting a DIY speed test on a cloud server (like Google colab or the free oracle instances or whatever): https://github.com/librespeed/speedtest. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
  • SSLVPN - Fluctuating bandwith
    It should be DIA. They provide the internet connection to the company since 2 decades and it's a very small ISP, so it's very vague in terms of contract. Iperf was giving me very terrible results with TCP, UDP was giving me a couple of... Source: over 3 years ago

View more

Tracking Graphwake since Nov 2026.

Alternatives to LibreSpeed and Graphwake

When comparing LibreSpeed and Graphwake, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...