Spanning VS git-sizer

• Automated Backups
  Spanning provides automated backups for cloud applications like Google Workspace, Office 365, and Salesforce, ensuring that user data is consistently saved without manual intervention.
• Easy Restore
  The platform offers easy restore options, allowing users to quickly recover lost or corrupted data, thereby minimizing downtime and the risk of data loss.
• Security and Compliance
  Spanning includes robust security features and compliance certifications, ensuring that backed-up data is secure and adheres to industry regulations.
• User-Friendly Interface
  The service comes with an intuitive interface that makes it easy for users to manage their backups and perform restores, even without extensive technical knowledge.
• Comprehensive Coverage
  Spanning supports multiple cloud platforms, providing a comprehensive solution for organizations using various cloud services.

Possible disadvantages

• Cost
  The service can be expensive for small businesses or individuals compared to other backup solutions, especially when multiple user licenses are required.
• Limited Customization
  While it offers essential backup and restore functionalities, the platform may lack advanced customization options that might be available in other specialized backup solutions.
• Dependency on Cloud Services
  Spanning's effectiveness is inherently tied to the availability and performance of the cloud services it supports, which could be a limitation if those services experience downtime or issues.
• Integration Complexity
  For organizations with complex IT environments or legacy systems, integrating Spanning with existing infrastructure might require additional time and resources.
• Feature Set
  Some users may find that Spanning’s feature set is limited compared to more advanced or niche backup solutions that provide additional functionalities and options.

• Comprehensive Repository Analysis
  git-sizer analyzes many different dimensions of a Git repository including commit count, tree size, blob size, history depth, and reference counts, providing a holistic view of repository health and potential scaling issues.
• Easy to Use
  The tool is simple to run with minimal setup—just execute it within a git repository—and it produces clear, human-readable output that highlights potential problem areas without requiring complex configuration.
• Identifies Performance Bottlenecks
  It helps identify specific issues that could degrade Git performance, such as excessively large blobs, deep history, large trees, or too many references, which is valuable before migrating or scaling repositories.
• Open Source and Maintained by GitHub
  Being an official GitHub project, it benefits from credibility, community trust, and ongoing maintenance, and it is well documented with clear explanations of what each metric means.
• Useful for Pre-Migration Checks
  It's particularly helpful for teams migrating repositories to new platforms or consolidating repos, as it flags potential issues that could cause problems during migration or with hosting providers' limits.

Possible disadvantages

• No Automatic Remediation
  git-sizer only identifies and reports issues but does not offer any built-in tools or automated processes to fix problems like large blobs or excessive history depth—users must use separate tools like BFG Repo-Cleaner or git-filter-repo.
• Output Can Be Overwhelming for Beginners
  While detailed, the output includes many metrics and threshold levels that may be confusing for users unfamiliar with Git internals, requiring some learning curve to fully interpret results.
• Limited to Local Analysis
  The tool analyzes a local clone of the repository, so it requires users to have a full local copy of the repo (or at least enough history) to get accurate results, which can be time-consuming for very large repositories.
• No Real-Time Monitoring
  It functions as a one-time analysis tool rather than providing continuous or real-time monitoring of repository health, requiring manual reruns to track changes over time.
• Command-Line Only Interface
  The tool lacks a graphical user interface, which may be less accessible for users who prefer visual dashboards or are less comfortable with command-line tools.

Spanning Backup for Office 365: Product Demo

More videos

No git-sizer videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

• Who can I talk to at Kaseya so they stop billing me for a cancelled product?

  They still billed it. Then, while I was arguing with them about it, they turned me over to collections for non payment...at which point they said I could only talk to collections. Months went by of bitching at them every couple of days... Source: over 3 years ago

• Backup of Google Workspace?

  We use Spanning to backup staff accounts. It's very easy to set up, and the price seems reasonable. Source: over 4 years ago

• Syncro MSP Will Not Cancel My Account. I have been requesting this since November 2021.

  I tried to cancel some spanning.com tenants so I feel your pain. They either bill and autocharge a credit card and fail to renew the tenant and then turn you to collections even though they've been paid or you finally do cancel and they... Source: over 4 years ago

• how to keep github repos small?

  Also there’s a cool project from GitHub you can use to help understand the size of git’s objects in your git repo https://github.com/github/git-sizer. This might help you determine what the best cloning strategy could be. Source: almost 5 years ago