Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Smart Text Editor VS Editor.js

Compare Smart Text Editor VS Editor.js and see what are their differences

Smart Text Editor logo Smart Text Editor

The text editor that requires only a browser and a keyboard

Editor.js logo Editor.js

A block-styled editor with clean JSON output
Not present
  • Editor.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-24

Smart Text Editor features and specs

  • Intuitive Interface
    Smart Text Editor offers a user-friendly and modern interface that makes it easy for users to navigate and manage their documents efficiently.
  • Collaboration Features
    The editor supports real-time collaboration, allowing multiple users to work on the same document simultaneously, enhancing productivity and teamwork.
  • Advanced Formatting Tools
    It provides a wide range of formatting options, including various font styles, sizes, and colors, enabling users to customize their documents extensively.
  • Cloud Integration
    Smart Text Editor integrates seamlessly with popular cloud storage services, allowing users to save and sync their documents across different devices.
  • AI-Assisted Suggestions
    The editor includes AI-powered suggestions for grammar and style improvements, helping users enhance the quality of their writing.

Possible disadvantages of Smart Text Editor

  • Limited Offline Functionality
    The editor's offline capabilities are restricted, which can hinder productivity for users without reliable internet access.
  • Subscription Cost
    Smart Text Editor requires a subscription fee for access to its full range of features, which might be a drawback for budget-conscious users.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    While the basic features are easy to use, there is a learning curve involved in mastering more advanced tools and functionalities.
  • Dependency on Cloud Services
    The reliance on cloud services can be a concern for users who prioritize data privacy and prefer to keep their documents stored locally.
  • Performance on Low-End Devices
    The application may experience performance issues on older or less powerful devices, affecting smooth operation and efficiency.

Editor.js features and specs

  • Modular Architecture
    Editor.js is designed with a modular architecture, allowing users to add and remove tools (blocks) as needed, which provides flexibility and extensibility.
  • Block Style Editor
    The editor uses a block-style approach, where each type of content (paragraphs, images, videos, etc.) is treated as a separate block, making complex layouts easier to manage and edit.
  • Clean JSON Output
    Produces structured JSON data that is easy to parse and process, which is beneficial for storing content in a database or serving it via an API.
  • API Flexibility
    Offers a well-documented API that developers can use to create custom tools and extensions, enhancing the editor's functionality and adapting it to specific use cases.
  • Lightweight & Fast
    The editor is lightweight and performs well, offering a responsive experience for users, even on less powerful devices.
  • Open Source
    As an open-source project, Editor.js allows developers to contribute to its development and tailor it to their own needs without licensing fees.
  • Rich Plugin Ecosystem
    A variety of plugins are available that extend the core functionality of Editor.js, covering a wide range of use-cases from simple text editing to complex multimedia integration.

Possible disadvantages of Editor.js

  • Steep Learning Curve
    While powerful, the modular architecture can be confusing for new users who are not familiar with block-based editors.
  • Limited Built-In Tools
    Out-of-the-box, Editor.js provides only basic functionality, requiring additional plugins or custom development for more advanced features.
  • Dependency on JavaScript
    Editor.js heavily relies on JavaScript, which might be a limitation for environments where JavaScript is restricted or needs to be minimized.
  • Plugin Compatibility
    Since the ecosystem includes plugins developed by various contributors, there may be issues with compatibility or stability between different plugins.
  • Configuration Complexity
    Setting up and configuring Editor.js with all necessary tools and plugins can be time-consuming and complex, requiring a good understanding of JavaScript and its ecosystem.
  • Lack of Native Features
    Some features that are standard in other rich-text editors, like WYSIWYG capabilities, are not natively available in Editor.js, necessitating additional development.
  • Accessibility Concerns
    Ensuring the editor meets accessibility standards (e.g., WCAG) might require extra effort, as not all plugins and customizations may adhere to best practices.

Analysis of Editor.js

Overall verdict

  • Editor.js is considered a good choice for developers who need a flexible, modern content editing solution that prioritizes structured data. It is particularly beneficial for projects where content needs to be presented in various ways or integrated with complex data models. However, it might not be the best fit for those seeking a traditional, more intuitive text editing experience out-of-the-box.

Why this product is good

  • Editor.js is designed to be a block-styled editor, which provides a clean and flexible way to handle content. It focuses on modern use cases such as creating structured data content, offering a unique approach compared to traditional WYSIWYG editors. Its emphasis on separation of data and views makes it easy to present the content in different formats. Additionally, it offers a highly pluggable architecture, enabling developers to extend its functionality with custom blocks.

Recommended for

  • Developers building applications requiring structured data
  • Projects where content must be easily re-purposed or presented differently
  • Teams who benefit from a highly customizable and extendable editor
  • Use cases involving complex integrations with data-driven systems

Smart Text Editor videos

No Smart Text Editor videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Editor.js videos

Editor.js - An Awesome Next Gen Block Styled Content Editor!

More videos:

  • Review - umbraCoffee #079 - Editor.js, tide flows, and Codegarden blues

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Smart Text Editor and Editor.js)
Text Editors
61 61%
39% 39
Productivity
100 100%
0% 0
Rich Text Editor
0 0%
100% 100
IDE
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Smart Text Editor and Editor.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Smart Text Editor and Editor.js

Smart Text Editor Reviews

We have no reviews of Smart Text Editor yet.
Be the first one to post

Editor.js Reviews

14 Best Open Source WYSIWYG HTML Editors
Editor.js gives you the perks of a block-style editor. The headings, paragraphs, and other items are all separate blocks, which makes them editable while not affecting the rest of the content.
Source: itsfoss.com

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Smart Text Editor and Editor.js, you can also consider the following products

Sublime Text - Sublime Text is a sophisticated text editor for code, html and prose - any kind of text file. You'll love the slick user interface and extraordinary features. Fully customizable with macros, and syntax highlighting for most major languages.

CKEditor - Real-time collaborative future-ready rich text editor

Redactor Text Editor - WYSIWYG html editor.

Quill - Powerful, API-driven rich text editor

Cleartext - A text editor that allows only the 1,000 most common words

Aloha Editor - Aloha Editor is an HTML5 WYSIWYG Editor that gives you a total new experience when editing.