Table of contents
Modular Architecture
Editor.js is designed with a modular architecture, allowing users to add and remove tools (blocks) as needed, which provides flexibility and extensibility.
Block Style Editor
The editor uses a block-style approach, where each type of content (paragraphs, images, videos, etc.) is treated as a separate block, making complex layouts easier to manage and edit.
Clean JSON Output
Produces structured JSON data that is easy to parse and process, which is beneficial for storing content in a database or serving it via an API.
API Flexibility
Offers a well-documented API that developers can use to create custom tools and extensions, enhancing the editor's functionality and adapting it to specific use cases.
Lightweight & Fast
The editor is lightweight and performs well, offering a responsive experience for users, even on less powerful devices.
Open Source
As an open-source project, Editor.js allows developers to contribute to its development and tailor it to their own needs without licensing fees.
Rich Plugin Ecosystem
A variety of plugins are available that extend the core functionality of Editor.js, covering a wide range of use-cases from simple text editing to complex multimedia integration.
Editor.js is considered a good choice for developers who need a flexible, modern content editing solution that prioritizes structured data. It is particularly beneficial for projects where content needs to be presented in various ways or integrated with complex data models. However, it might not be the best fit for those seeking a traditional, more intuitive text editing experience out-of-the-box.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if Editor.js is good.
Check the traffic stats of Editor.js on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of Editor.js on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of Editor.js's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of Editor.js on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about Editor.js on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
Do you know an article comparing Editor.js to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is Editor.js good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss Editor.js here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.
