Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Redactor Text Editor VS Editor.js

Compare Redactor Text Editor VS Editor.js and see what are their differences

Redactor Text Editor logo Redactor Text Editor

WYSIWYG html editor.

Editor.js logo Editor.js

A block-styled editor with clean JSON output
  • Redactor Text Editor Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-17
  • Editor.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-24

Redactor Text Editor features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    Redactor offers a clean and intuitive interface that makes it accessible for users of all levels, enhancing the user experience.
  • Lightweight
    The editor is highly optimized and doesn't add significant load to web pages, leading to faster loading times.
  • Customizability
    Developers can easily customize the editor to fit specific needs and integrate it seamlessly into various projects.
  • Cross-Browser Compatibility
    Redactor ensures consistency across different browsers, ensuring that the content looks the same regardless of where it is viewed.
  • Plugin Support
    The availability of a variety of plugins allows users to extend the functionality of the editor according to their specific requirements.

Possible disadvantages of Redactor Text Editor

  • License Cost
    Redactor is a commercial product, which means that it requires a purchase or subscription, potentially increasing project costs.
  • Limited Free Version
    The free version of Redactor may not include all features, which could be a limitation for users who need more advanced functionalities.
  • Lack of Advanced Features
    Compared to some competitors, Redactor may lack certain advanced features, which could be a drawback for users needing complex capabilities.
  • Learning Curve for Customization
    While customization is possible, it might require some time to learn how to effectively implement and manage it.
  • Dependence on JavaScript
    The editor heavily relies on JavaScript, which might be a consideration for projects that aim to minimize JavaScript usage.

Editor.js features and specs

  • Modular Architecture
    Editor.js is designed with a modular architecture, allowing users to add and remove tools (blocks) as needed, which provides flexibility and extensibility.
  • Block Style Editor
    The editor uses a block-style approach, where each type of content (paragraphs, images, videos, etc.) is treated as a separate block, making complex layouts easier to manage and edit.
  • Clean JSON Output
    Produces structured JSON data that is easy to parse and process, which is beneficial for storing content in a database or serving it via an API.
  • API Flexibility
    Offers a well-documented API that developers can use to create custom tools and extensions, enhancing the editor's functionality and adapting it to specific use cases.
  • Lightweight & Fast
    The editor is lightweight and performs well, offering a responsive experience for users, even on less powerful devices.
  • Open Source
    As an open-source project, Editor.js allows developers to contribute to its development and tailor it to their own needs without licensing fees.
  • Rich Plugin Ecosystem
    A variety of plugins are available that extend the core functionality of Editor.js, covering a wide range of use-cases from simple text editing to complex multimedia integration.

Possible disadvantages of Editor.js

  • Steep Learning Curve
    While powerful, the modular architecture can be confusing for new users who are not familiar with block-based editors.
  • Limited Built-In Tools
    Out-of-the-box, Editor.js provides only basic functionality, requiring additional plugins or custom development for more advanced features.
  • Dependency on JavaScript
    Editor.js heavily relies on JavaScript, which might be a limitation for environments where JavaScript is restricted or needs to be minimized.
  • Plugin Compatibility
    Since the ecosystem includes plugins developed by various contributors, there may be issues with compatibility or stability between different plugins.
  • Configuration Complexity
    Setting up and configuring Editor.js with all necessary tools and plugins can be time-consuming and complex, requiring a good understanding of JavaScript and its ecosystem.
  • Lack of Native Features
    Some features that are standard in other rich-text editors, like WYSIWYG capabilities, are not natively available in Editor.js, necessitating additional development.
  • Accessibility Concerns
    Ensuring the editor meets accessibility standards (e.g., WCAG) might require extra effort, as not all plugins and customizations may adhere to best practices.

Analysis of Editor.js

Overall verdict

  • Editor.js is considered a good choice for developers who need a flexible, modern content editing solution that prioritizes structured data. It is particularly beneficial for projects where content needs to be presented in various ways or integrated with complex data models. However, it might not be the best fit for those seeking a traditional, more intuitive text editing experience out-of-the-box.

Why this product is good

  • Editor.js is designed to be a block-styled editor, which provides a clean and flexible way to handle content. It focuses on modern use cases such as creating structured data content, offering a unique approach compared to traditional WYSIWYG editors. Its emphasis on separation of data and views makes it easy to present the content in different formats. Additionally, it offers a highly pluggable architecture, enabling developers to extend its functionality with custom blocks.

Recommended for

  • Developers building applications requiring structured data
  • Projects where content must be easily re-purposed or presented differently
  • Teams who benefit from a highly customizable and extendable editor
  • Use cases involving complex integrations with data-driven systems

Redactor Text Editor videos

(Easy Article Editor) How to EDIT Articles Online 2021 (Hemingway App)

Editor.js videos

Editor.js - An Awesome Next Gen Block Styled Content Editor!

More videos:

  • Review - umbraCoffee #079 - Editor.js, tide flows, and Codegarden blues

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Redactor Text Editor and Editor.js)
Text Editors
58 58%
42% 42
Rich Text Editor
50 50%
50% 50
IDE
100 100%
0% 0
IDEs And Text Editors
51 51%
49% 49

User comments

Share your experience with using Redactor Text Editor and Editor.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Redactor Text Editor and Editor.js

Redactor Text Editor Reviews

Looking for a CKEditor? Try these 10 Alternatives
Fortunately, plenty of free and paid options are available, making it easy to find an editor that fits your requirements and budget. Whether you choose TinyMCE for its simplicity and compatibility, Froala Editor for its customization options, or Redactor for its advanced features, there is an editor out there that can help you create professional-looking content for your...

Editor.js Reviews

14 Best Open Source WYSIWYG HTML Editors
Editor.js gives you the perks of a block-style editor. The headings, paragraphs, and other items are all separate blocks, which makes them editable while not affecting the rest of the content.
Source: itsfoss.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Redactor Text Editor seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Redactor Text Editor mentions (1)

  • is there any plugin that is similar? it is used for edit text, after user click on the text
    I use Article Editor and I love it. https://imperavi.com/article/. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • What is your go to page/block builder?
    I found https://imperavi.com/article/ but it looks a bit basic to me. Source: about 3 years ago
  • My pain building a WYSIWYG editor with contenteditable
    Costs money - but https://imperavi.com/redactor/ is the best I've used, tho I'm interested in tiptap if I can get the time to make it do what redactor does for us. Source: about 4 years ago

Editor.js mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Editor.js yet. Tracking of Editor.js recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Redactor Text Editor and Editor.js, you can also consider the following products

Smart Text Editor - The text editor that requires only a browser and a keyboard

CKEditor - Real-time collaborative future-ready rich text editor

Froala Editor - Froala Editor is a WYSIWYG HTML editorย that enables rich text editing capabilities for the applications.

Quill - Powerful, API-driven rich text editor

Aloha Editor - Aloha Editor is an HTML5 WYSIWYG Editor that gives you a total new experience when editing.

Sublime Text - Sublime Text is a sophisticated text editor for code, html and prose - any kind of text file. You'll love the slick user interface and extraordinary features. Fully customizable with macros, and syntax highlighting for most major languages.