Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Smart HTTPS VS Google Scholar

Compare Smart HTTPS VS Google Scholar and see what are their differences

Proton Drive for Business
End-to-end encrypted cloud storage built for teams. Keep all your business data private, fully secure, and under your complete control. No backdoors, no tracking, no compromises. Swiss privacy laws and zero-knowledge encryption protect what matters. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. ยป Base Details
  2. ยป Videos
  3. ยป Reviews
  4. ยป Alternatives

Smart HTTPS logo Smart HTTPS

Automatically changes HTTP addresses to the secure HTTPS, and if loading encounters error, reverts...

Google Scholar logo Google Scholar

Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text of scholarly...
  • Smart HTTPS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-27
  • Google Scholar Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-07

Smart HTTPS features and specs

  • Automatic Redirection to HTTPS
    Smart HTTPS automatically changes HTTP protocol to HTTPS, which enhances the security of your browsing by ensuring that the connection is encrypted.
  • Fallback to HTTP
    In cases where an HTTPS version of the site is not available, it can automatically revert back to HTTP, ensuring you can still access the website instead of facing a disruption.
  • Whitelist Feature
    Allows users to maintain a whitelist of websites that should always be accessed using HTTP, providing flexibility and control over the browsing experience.
  • Improved Privacy
    By automatically using HTTPS, it helps in protecting user data from eavesdroppers and enhances privacy while browsing the web.

Possible disadvantages of Smart HTTPS

  • Compatibility Issues
    Some websites may not function correctly over HTTPS, leading to potential misbehavior or broken features when accessed using Smart HTTPS.
  • Potential for Increased Loading Times
    Sometimes, redirecting to HTTPS can result in slightly longer loading times, especially if the server's configuration is not optimal for HTTPS.
  • Resource Intensive
    The addon might consume additional resources to check for HTTPS versions of every site, which could impact browser performance, especially on older systems.
  • Limited Control Over Redirection
    Users might have limited ability to control which sites are redirected to HTTPS if they haven't preemptively whitelisted specific HTTP sites.

Google Scholar features and specs

  • Accessibility
    Google Scholar is freely accessible to anyone with an internet connection, removing barriers to accessing academic research.
  • Wide Range of Sources
    It indexes scholarly articles from a broad range of disciplines and sources, including academic publishers, universities, and other scholarly websites.
  • Citation Tracking
    Google Scholar provides citation information, allowing users to see how often a paper has been cited and to track the influence of research over time.
  • Ease of Use
    The interface is user-friendly and familiar to anyone who has used Google, making it easy to search for and find scholarly papers.
  • Advanced Search Options
    Google Scholar offers advanced search capabilities, including the ability to search by author, date range, and specific journals.

Possible disadvantages of Google Scholar

  • Quality Control
    The inclusion criteria for sources indexed are not transparent, leading to variability in the quality of the materials available.
  • Coverage
    Although extensive, Google Scholar's coverage is not comprehensive, and some important journals and articles might be missing.
  • Duplicate Entries
    There can be multiple entries for the same document, making it difficult to determine the most authoritative version.
  • Limited Full-Text Availability
    Many articles listed in Google Scholar are behind paywalls, meaning full access often requires a subscription or purchase.
  • Inconsistent Metadata
    The metadata (author names, publication dates, etc.) can sometimes be inaccurate or incomplete, affecting search results and citation tracking.

Analysis of Google Scholar

Overall verdict

  • Overall, Google Scholar is considered a good resource for academic research. It is user-friendly, provides comprehensive search results, and includes useful features such as citation analysis and linking to full-text articles when available. However, it may not have access to all subscription-only content available through university libraries or specialized databases.

Why this product is good

  • Google Scholar is a valuable tool because it provides free access to a vast range of scholarly articles, theses, books, conference papers, and patents across various disciplines. It indexes content from academic publishers, research institutions, and other scholarly websites, making it a convenient resource for researchers, students, and academics. Its citation tracking feature is particularly useful for understanding the impact and relevance of specific works.

Recommended for

  • Students looking for scholarly articles for their assignments.
  • Researchers who want to track citations and research trends.
  • Academics needing access to a wide range of publications.
  • Anyone interested in finding reliable, peer-reviewed sources for information.

Smart HTTPS videos

No Smart HTTPS videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Google Scholar videos

+ Add

How to do a literature review using Google Scholar

More videos:

  • Tutorial - How To Use Google Scholar | Writing A Literature Review
  • Tutorial - How to use Google Scholar to find journal articles | Essay Tips

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Smart HTTPS and Google Scholar)

Smart HTTPS

Google Scholar

Chrome Extensions
100 100%
Chrome Extensions
0% 0
Digital Whiteboard
0 0%
Digital Whiteboard
100% 100
Tool
100 100%
Tool
0% 0
Research Tools
0 0%
Research Tools
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Smart HTTPS and Google Scholar. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Google Scholar seems to be a lot more popular than Smart HTTPS. While we know about 1004 links to Google Scholar, we've tracked only 2 mentions of Smart HTTPS. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Smart HTTPS mentions (2)

  • โ€œWe donโ€™t track you โ€ฆ except for when we get paid for it.โ€
    Smart HTTPS, site This tries to send you to https sites instead of http sites. Using http sites makes you venerable to man in the middle attacks. (dont use http on public wifis if possible). Source: about 4 years ago
  • question about non secure websites
    I'd recommend using Smart HTTPS which automatically makes your site's HTTPS if it can offer it so it will reduce these situations. Here's the site where you can choose whichever browser you use. https://mybrowseraddon.com/smart-https.html. Source: over 4 years ago

Google Scholar mentions (1004)

  • Who discovered grokking and why is the name hard to find?
    Https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.02177 This paper is not hard to find; it's the first result when you search for "grokking" with https://scholar.google.com. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • AI generated font using nano banana
    Definitely not the first AI generated font. One can find an enormous amount of research in AI font generation on https://scholar.google.com/ going back many years. This could possibly be the first one that used Nano Banana though. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • ChatGPT Search
    > Has google completely stopped working for anyone else? Yes. However, I found that https://scholar.google.com still works perfectly well. It feels just as the old Google without all the crap they've been adding in the last years. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Is Psychology Going to Cincinnati?
    He links to a meta analysis* that says CBT does cure depression well enough and does so consistently for many decades without any declines in effectiveness. Later for some reason, he says no single mental illness was ever cured. It seems the main point of the article is to say that nothing except "nudges" ever worked in psychology - this is nonsense that he himself contradicts as I mentioned above. Just use... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Ask HN: Where do you subscribe to published journal topics?
    If you mean articles: No, it would be unfeasible. According to Science [https://www.science.org/content/article/scienceadviser-scientists-are-publishing-too-many-papers-and-s-bad-science] there are about 2.82 million articles coming out every year. That's 5.3 papers every minute, 24/7. If you mean a list of titles, your best bet would probably be something like https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/ [PMC, life... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Smart HTTPS and Google Scholar, you can also consider the following products

HTTPS Everywhere - Chrome extension that encrypts and secures your browser

PubMed.gov - PubMed comprises more than 29 million citations for biomedical literature from MEDLINE, life science journals, and online books. Citations may include links to full-text content from PubMed Central and publisher web sites.

HTTPZ - HTTPZ is meant to be unobtrusive and lightweight.

SCI-HUB - It provides mass and public access to tens of millions of research papers

SSL Enforcer - SSL Enforcer - Force SSL/TLS encryption for any browser or app. Block all unsecure connections.

Forge - Static web hosting made simple

Loading...