Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Smart HTTPS VS arXiv

Compare Smart HTTPS VS arXiv and see what are their differences

Fluenta.space
The 6-signal founder validation companion. Score any startup idea on a 0-100 Launch Readiness Score across demand, pain, competition, money, funding, urgency. 1000+ ideas pre-scored. 200+ data sources. Daily refresh. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. ยป Base Details
  2. ยป Videos
  3. ยป Reviews
  4. ยป Alternatives

Smart HTTPS logo Smart HTTPS

Automatically changes HTTP addresses to the secure HTTPS, and if loading encounters error, reverts...

arXiv logo arXiv

arXiv is a free distribution service and an open-access archive for scholarly articles.
  • Smart HTTPS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-27
  • arXiv Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-23

Smart HTTPS features and specs

  • Automatic Redirection to HTTPS
    Smart HTTPS automatically changes HTTP protocol to HTTPS, which enhances the security of your browsing by ensuring that the connection is encrypted.
  • Fallback to HTTP
    In cases where an HTTPS version of the site is not available, it can automatically revert back to HTTP, ensuring you can still access the website instead of facing a disruption.
  • Whitelist Feature
    Allows users to maintain a whitelist of websites that should always be accessed using HTTP, providing flexibility and control over the browsing experience.
  • Improved Privacy
    By automatically using HTTPS, it helps in protecting user data from eavesdroppers and enhances privacy while browsing the web.

Possible disadvantages of Smart HTTPS

  • Compatibility Issues
    Some websites may not function correctly over HTTPS, leading to potential misbehavior or broken features when accessed using Smart HTTPS.
  • Potential for Increased Loading Times
    Sometimes, redirecting to HTTPS can result in slightly longer loading times, especially if the server's configuration is not optimal for HTTPS.
  • Resource Intensive
    The addon might consume additional resources to check for HTTPS versions of every site, which could impact browser performance, especially on older systems.
  • Limited Control Over Redirection
    Users might have limited ability to control which sites are redirected to HTTPS if they haven't preemptively whitelisted specific HTTP sites.

arXiv features and specs

  • Open Access
    arXiv offers free access to a wide range of scientific papers, providing open access to high-quality research without paywalls.
  • Rapid Dissemination
    Researchers can quickly share their findings with the global community, potentially accelerating scientific progress.
  • Large Repository
    With millions of papers in various fields such as physics, computer science, and mathematics, arXiv is a comprehensive resource for researchers.
  • Preprints
    Authors can share their manuscripts before formal peer review, which allows for immediate feedback and increased visibility.
  • Community and Collaborations
    arXiv fosters a collaborative environment where researchers can easily find and build on each other's work.

Possible disadvantages of arXiv

  • Lack of Peer Review
    Papers submitted to arXiv are not peer-reviewed, which means the quality and reliability of the content can vary.
  • Overwhelming Volume
    The sheer number of papers can make it difficult to find relevant and high-quality research.
  • Variable Quality
    Since submissions are not vetted through a rigorous peer review process, the quality of papers can range from excellent to poor.
  • Potential for Plagiarism
    The open nature of arXiv can sometimes lead to issues with plagiarism or uncredited use of ideas.
  • Not Recognized by Some Journals
    Some academic journals do not consider papers uploaded to arXiv as unpublished, which can affect a researcherโ€™s ability to publish in those journals.

Analysis of arXiv

Overall verdict

  • Yes, arXiv is considered good, especially for academics and researchers who need access to the latest research developments or want to share their work broadly and promptly.

Why this product is good

  • arXiv is a highly respected open-access repository for scholarly articles in fields such as physics, computer science, mathematics, statistics, and more. It allows researchers to share their findings quickly and receive feedback from the global academic community. As a preprint server, it aids in the rapid dissemination of research, which can be critical in rapidly evolving fields and during public health crises.

Recommended for

    Students, researchers, and academics in scientific fields who are looking for early access to research outputs or wish to publish their own preprints for peer feedback. It's also beneficial for anyone interested in staying up-to-date with cutting-edge developments in science and technology.

Smart HTTPS videos

No Smart HTTPS videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

arXiv videos

+ Add

How to submit a paper to arxiv

More videos:

  • Review - Do Research on arXiv
  • Review - RNAAS banned on arXiv

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Smart HTTPS and arXiv)

Smart HTTPS

arXiv

Chrome Extensions
100 100%
Chrome Extensions
0% 0
Education
0 0%
Education
100% 100
Tool
100 100%
Tool
0% 0
Ebooks
0 0%
Ebooks
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Smart HTTPS and arXiv. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, arXiv seems to be a lot more popular than Smart HTTPS. While we know about 334 links to arXiv, we've tracked only 2 mentions of Smart HTTPS. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Smart HTTPS mentions (2)

  • โ€œWe donโ€™t track you โ€ฆ except for when we get paid for it.โ€
    Smart HTTPS, site This tries to send you to https sites instead of http sites. Using http sites makes you venerable to man in the middle attacks. (dont use http on public wifis if possible). Source: about 4 years ago
  • question about non secure websites
    I'd recommend using Smart HTTPS which automatically makes your site's HTTPS if it can offer it so it will reduce these situations. Here's the site where you can choose whichever browser you use. https://mybrowseraddon.com/smart-https.html. Source: over 4 years ago

arXiv mentions (334)

  • How to Evaluate AI Agents: 3 Framework Comparison
    The evaluation landscape for AI agents saw 45+ new research papers in the past 6 months on arXiv (Cornell University's open-access preprint repository), proposing new metrics for trajectory quality (TRACE), hallucination detection (LSC), and cost-performance tradeoffs (KAMI). But when it comes to implementing these evaluations, which framework should you use? - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • I Built a $0 Search Engine on Real Web Data (No Algolia or Elasticsearch)
    I depend heavily on arxiv papers for this. Using a SERP API (Bright Data) for Google, running site:arxiv.org plus a well-framed query gets me recent, relevant papers. Iโ€™d run four or five of these, collate the resultsโ€ฆand then inevitably get bogged down scrolling JSON, opening new tabs, running grep. Just godawful UX for what is, at its core, a search problem (not data). - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Adiรณs a Agile en 2026: el auge del Spec-Driven Development con IA
    ArXiv โ€” Repositorio del paper "Spec-Driven Development: From Code to Contract in the Age of AI" (enero 2026). - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Should You Be Using RAG in 2026?
    Research shows that hallucinations remain prevalent in complex reasoning and open-domain factual recall, where error rates can exceed 33%. In a customer-facing application, that is not a product quirk. That is a liability. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • LLM Fine-Tuning: The Complete Guide to Customizing Language Models (2026)
    This guide synthesizes the technical depth of Unsloth, the security perspective of Lakera, and the academic rigor of the arXiv comprehensive survey โ€” with an enterprise decision framework and cost analysis that none of them provide. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Smart HTTPS and arXiv, you can also consider the following products

HTTPS Everywhere - Chrome extension that encrypts and secures your browser

SCI-HUB - It provides mass and public access to tens of millions of research papers

HTTPZ - HTTPZ is meant to be unobtrusive and lightweight.

Google Scholar - Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text of scholarly...

SSL Enforcer - SSL Enforcer - Force SSL/TLS encryption for any browser or app. Block all unsecure connections.

PubMed.gov - PubMed comprises more than 29 million citations for biomedical literature from MEDLINE, life science journals, and online books. Citations may include links to full-text content from PubMed Central and publisher web sites.

Loading...