Skyelight VS ClientForms.app

ClientForms.app's answer:

Frontend: Next.js 15 (React 19), Tailwind CSS Backend: Supabase (PostgreSQL, Row-Level Security) Authentication: Clerk Payments: Stripe Hosting: Vercel (Sydney region) Database hosting: Supabase (Australian data residency)

Skyelight's answer

Skyelight is for teams that review websites together and increasingly build them with AI coding agents. That includes agencies collecting client sign-off, product and design teams reviewing prototypes and staging builds, and developers who want feedback delivered straight to their coding agent. What they share is a mixed team: non-technical reviewers on one side, developers and agents on the other.

ClientForms.app's answer:

Psychologists who assess ADHD and autism. Typically private practice, solo or small group (1-5 clinicians), currently using paper forms and spending hours on admin per assessment. They want something that works and is secure.

Skyelight's answer

Skyelight turns website feedback into a conversation that both people and coding agents can work from. Reviewers press C and click any element on a live site, prototype, or staging build to start a thread, including menus, modals, and highlighted copy. Skyelight classifies each thread in real time as the discussion develops, captures a screenshot of the element, and connects it to your GitHub repo and branch previews so the feedback carries the source context behind it. From there, a thread can be assigned to a teammate or handed straight to a coding agent like Claude Code, Cursor, or Codex through the Skyelight MCP.

ClientForms.app's answer:

Neurodivergent-first design. Most digital forms just replicate paper online. ClientForms is built specifically for ADHD and autism patients - progress bars with time remaining (helps with time blindness), softer colours instead of harsh white, sticky headers so you always know where you are. The forms are designed to reduce anxiety and improve completion rates.

Skyelight's answer

Most website feedback tools were designed to collect reports and push them into a ticket queue, with agent support added later. Skyelight is built for teams where the next step after feedback is often an AI agent writing the fix. Comments stay as live threads that get classified as people talk them through, instead of one-off reports someone has to triage afterward. Each thread is tied to the element and the code behind it, so whoever picks it up, a developer or an agent, starts with the context already in place.

ClientForms.app's answer:

Most clinical software treats patients as an afterthought. ClientForms is designed specifically for neurodivergent users who are filling out the forms, progress indicators, time estimates, calmer colours, predictable layouts. One link, no signup required, works on any device. Patients just open and complete.

Skyelight's answer

I've spent 18 years designing and building for the web, from marketing sites to full applications. Across the table from product teams, engineers and clients, I kept hitting the same problem: feedback was hard to get, and once it came in it was scattered across screenshots, email threads and Slack messages. Then someone had to work out what each comment meant before anything could be fixed. I built Skyelight so feedback lands on the page it's about, with the context a developer or their AI agent needs to act on it.

Skyelight's answer

Skyelight is used by digital agencies running client website reviews, product and design teams reviewing prototypes and staging builds, and developers building with AI coding agents.