Website feedback tool for agencies, designers, engineers and product teams to annotate any element on a live page, from prototype to production, so teams or coding agents can act on it.
A startup from the United States, founded by Cory Shoaf and Matt Elsey.
This page is designed to help you find out whether Skyelight is good and if it is the right choice for you.
Skyelight is for agencies, designers, engineers and product teams who build live sites with clients and stakeholders. Reviewers pin comments directly on any part of a live site, prototype or preview, so each thread arrives tied to the exact element and source line. Comments are classified automatically as bug, feedback or idea. Each comment records the browser and any errors from just before it, plus an optional screenshot, so developers can send it straight to their AI coding tool to investigate, plan or fix. Reviewers are free on every plan, and on Pro and Team, guests can comment without an account.
Listed in
Pin Feedback
Pin comments on any live page with no code changes
Assign Agent Task
Let your agent investigate, plan or fix and open a PR
Organize Feedback
Auto-sort feedback into bugs, ideas, copy or custom types
Pass to Your Agent
Hand feedback to Claude Code, Cursor or Codex via MCP
Pinpoint Exact Element and Source Line
Capture browser, console errors and failed requests per pin
Free Reviewers
Invite clients and stakeholders as free
I've spent 18 years designing and building for the web, from marketing sites to full applications. Across the table from product teams, engineers and clients, I kept hitting the same problem: feedback was hard to get, and once it came in it was scattered across screenshots, email threads and Slack messages. Then someone had to work out what each comment meant before anything could be fixed. I built Skyelight so feedback lands on the page it's about, with the context a developer or their AI agent needs to act on it.
Skyelight is used by digital agencies running client website reviews, product and design teams reviewing prototypes and staging builds, and developers building with AI coding agents.
Skyelight turns website feedback into a conversation that both people and coding agents can work from. Reviewers press C and click any element on a live site, prototype, or staging build to start a thread, including menus, modals, and highlighted copy. Skyelight classifies each thread in real time as the discussion develops, captures a screenshot of the element, and connects it to your GitHub repo and branch previews so the feedback carries the source context behind it. From there, a thread can be assigned to a teammate or handed straight to a coding agent like Claude Code, Cursor, or Codex through the Skyelight MCP.
Most website feedback tools were designed to collect reports and push them into a ticket queue, with agent support added later. Skyelight is built for teams where the next step after feedback is often an AI agent writing the fix. Comments stay as live threads that get classified as people talk them through, instead of one-off reports someone has to triage afterward. Each thread is tied to the element and the code behind it, so whoever picks it up, a developer or an agent, starts with the context already in place.
Skyelight is for teams that review websites together and increasingly build them with AI coding agents. That includes agencies collecting client sign-off, product and design teams reviewing prototypes and staging builds, and developers who want feedback delivered straight to their coding agent. What they share is a mixed team: non-technical reviewers on one side, developers and agents on the other.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if Skyelight is good.
Check the traffic stats of Skyelight on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of Skyelight on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of Skyelight's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of Skyelight on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about Skyelight on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
Do you know an article comparing Skyelight to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is Skyelight good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss Skyelight here. The primary details have been verified within the last quarter. So they could be considered up to date. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.
