Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

SimpleServer:WWW VS SimpleHTTPServer

Compare SimpleServer:WWW VS SimpleHTTPServer and see what are their differences

This page does not exist

SimpleServer:WWW logo SimpleServer:WWW

One of the easiest to use and most versatile webservers out there.

SimpleHTTPServer logo SimpleHTTPServer

Serve a single directory over HTTP
  • SimpleServer:WWW Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-27
  • SimpleHTTPServer Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-22

SimpleServer:WWW features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    SimpleServer:WWW is user-friendly and easy to set up, making it ideal for beginners who need a simple web server solution.
  • Lightweight
    The software is lightweight and consumes minimal system resources, which is beneficial for running on older or less powerful hardware.
  • Freeware
    Being free to use, SimpleServer:WWW eliminates any cost barriers, allowing anyone to download and utilize it without financial investment.

Possible disadvantages of SimpleServer:WWW

  • Limited Features
    SimpleServer:WWW lacks many advanced features found in more robust web servers, such as detailed logging, extensive configuration options, and support for languages like PHP or databases.
  • Platform Dependency
    The software is designed for Windows operating systems, which limits its usage for users on other platforms like macOS or Linux.
  • Not Suitable for Production
    Due to its simplicity and lack of security features, SimpleServer:WWW is not recommended for use in a production environment where security and scalability are priorities.

SimpleHTTPServer features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    SimpleHTTPServer is extremely easy to use, requiring just a single command to spin up a basic web server, making it ideal for quick testing and development purposes.
  • No Installation Required
    As a standard module in Python 2.7, SimpleHTTPServer does not require any additional installation processes, reducing setup time for developers.
  • Platform Independent
    Being part of Python's standard library, it is platform-independent and can run on any system that supports Python.

Possible disadvantages of SimpleHTTPServer

  • Security
    SimpleHTTPServer lacks security features like HTTPS, authentication mechanisms, and protection against vulnerabilities, which makes it unsuitable for production environments.
  • Limited Functionality
    Designed for serving static files, SimpleHTTPServer lacks advanced functionalities like CGI scripting or integration with databases needed for dynamic content serving.
  • Obsolete
    Being a part of Python 2.7 which is no longer maintained, SimpleHTTPServer is obsolete, and users are encouraged to use Python 3, specifically the http.server module for better functionality and support.
  • Single Threaded
    By default, SimpleHTTPServer handles requests sequentially in a single-threaded manner, which can result in performance bottlenecks when handling multiple requests simultaneously.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to SimpleServer:WWW and SimpleHTTPServer)
Web Servers
44 44%
56% 56
Web And Application Servers
Application Server
40 40%
60% 60
Development Tools
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using SimpleServer:WWW and SimpleHTTPServer. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing SimpleServer:WWW and SimpleHTTPServer, you can also consider the following products

Apache HTTP Server - Apache httpd has been the most popular web server on the Internet since April 1996

nginx - A high performance free open source web server powering busiest sites on the Internet.

Microsoft IIS - Internet Information Services is a web server for Microsoft Windows

mini_httpd - mini_httpd is a small HTTP server for low or medium traffic sites.

lighttpd - A secure, fast, compliant, and very flexible web-server that has been optimized for high-performance environments

Abyss Webserver - Aprelium - Home