Software Alternatives & Startups

SignMyCode VS Typogram

Compare SignMyCode VS Typogram and see what are their differences

SignMyCode

Buy Code Signing Certificate at $219.99/yr and digitally sign the code of your executables, software & applications to build brand trust and increase software downloads.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Paid $219.99 / Annually
Typogram

Try our beginner-friendly logo design tool for startups.

Rating
0 reviews
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Typogram seems to be a lot more popular than SignMyCode. While we know about 30 links to Typogram, we've tracked only 1 mention of SignMyCode.

social mentions
1 vs 30
Code Signing Certificate popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
1 vs 191

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

SignMyCode
Typogram
Website signmycode.com typogram.co
Pricing
Paid $219.99 / Annually Official pricing
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

SignMyCode 5 features
Typogram 4 features
  • Wide Certificate Authority Support
    SignMyCode supports code signing certificates from major Certificate Authorities like Sectigo (Comodo), DigiCert, and Certum, giving users flexibility in choosing their preferred CA and certificate type.
  • Affordable Pricing
    SignMyCode offers competitive pricing on code signing certificates, often at discounted rates compared to purchasing directly from Certificate Authorities, making it a cost-effective option for developers and organizations.
  • Support for Multiple Platforms
    The service supports code signing for various platforms and file types including Microsoft Authenticode, Java, Adobe AIR, macOS, and more, allowing developers to sign code across different ecosystems.
  • EV Code Signing Available
    SignMyCode offers Extended Validation (EV) code signing certificates which provide enhanced trust, immediate SmartScreen reputation with Microsoft, and stronger security assurances compared to standard code signing certificates.
  • Easy Purchase and Renewal Process
    The platform provides a straightforward purchasing process with clear guidance on certificate selection, validation requirements, and renewal options, simplifying the often complex certificate acquisition workflow.

Possible disadvantages

  • Reseller, Not a Certificate Authority
    SignMyCode is a reseller rather than a direct Certificate Authority, meaning customers are adding a middleman which could potentially complicate support issues or certificate management compared to buying directly from the CA.
  • Validation Process Can Be Slow
    Like most code signing certificate providers, the validation process — especially for EV certificates — can take several days to complete, which may delay developers who need to sign code urgently.
  • Limited Advanced Tooling
    SignMyCode primarily focuses on selling certificates rather than providing advanced signing tools, CI/CD integrations, or automated signing workflows that some competing platforms offer as part of their service.
  • Support Availability Concerns
    Some users have reported that customer support response times can vary, and the level of technical assistance may not always match what is available directly from larger Certificate Authorities.
  • Less Brand Recognition
    Compared to well-established providers like DigiCert or GlobalSign, SignMyCode has less brand recognition and a smaller track record, which may make some enterprise customers hesitant to use the service.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    Typogram offers an intuitive interface that is easy for users of all skill levels to navigate, making the design process accessible to beginners and efficient for experienced designers.
  • Custom Branding Solutions
    The platform allows users to create tailored branding solutions, including logos and typography that are unique to their brand, enhancing brand identity.
  • Cost-Effective
    Typogram provides a cost-effective solution for startups and small businesses to develop professional-quality designs without the need for expensive design software or hiring designers.
  • Time-Saving Features
    The tool includes features that streamline the design process, enabling users to produce quality designs in less time compared to traditional design methods.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited Advanced Features
    Typogram might not include some advanced features that professional designers may require, limiting its use for complex design projects.
  • Potential Learning Curve
    Although the interface is user-friendly, users who are completely new to design tools may experience a learning curve when first using the platform.
  • Dependency on Internet Connection
    As an online tool, continuous access to the platform depends on a stable internet connection, which could be a limitation in areas with unreliable service.
  • Scalability Concerns for Large Projects
    Typogram may have limitations when scaling to accommodate large or complex design projects, making it less suitable for extensive branding overhauls.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

SignMyCode
Typogram

Overall verdict

  • SignMyCode is a legitimate authorized reseller of code signing certificates from trusted Certificate Authorities, offering competitive pricing and good customer support, making it a solid choice for developers and businesses seeking to sign their software.

Why this product is good

  • Authorized reseller of code signing certificates from major CAs like Sectigo and DigiCert
  • Offers both OV (Organization Validation) and EV (Extended Validation) code signing certificates
  • Competitive pricing compared to buying directly from Certificate Authorities
  • Provides customer support to assist with certificate installation and setup
  • Fast issuance process for OV certificates
  • Helps eliminate 'Unknown Publisher' warnings when installing software
  • Offers volume discounts for multiple certificate purchases

Recommended for

  • Independent software developers looking to sign their applications
  • Small to medium businesses distributing software
  • Companies needing to build trust with end users through verified publisher status
  • Developers who need to avoid Windows SmartScreen warnings
  • Organizations looking for cost-effective alternatives to direct CA purchases
  • Businesses requiring EV certificates for immediate reputation with Windows security systems

No analysis of Typogram yet.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
SignMyCode
Typogram
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using SignMyCode and Typogram. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

SignMyCode 1 mention
Typogram 30 mentions
  • EV Code Signing
    I used https://signmycode.com/ they were very helpful. Source: over 3 years ago
  • A long year of grinding for my saas
    This year has been long one for my logo design tool, Typogram: nice surprises, unexpected failures, and lots, lots of grind. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • I just found out that the saas that I'm building already exists
    I work on a logo design tool, so I have a bunch of competitors. Source: about 3 years ago
  • Ways to find problems and users that worked for me
    For example, for Typogram, we started with the problem of entrepreneurs trying to bootstrap / DIY their logos. I encountered this pain point directly from my professional experience as a designer. I had founder friends who used platforms... Source: about 3 years ago

View more

Alternatives to SignMyCode and Typogram

When comparing SignMyCode and Typogram, you can also consider the following products.