Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

ShareDrop VS Commit Together by Github

Compare ShareDrop VS Commit Together by Github and see what are their differences

ShareDrop

HTML5 clone of Apple's AirDrop - easy P2P file transfer powered by WebRTC

ShareDrop Landing page
Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
Alternatives Is it good?
Commit Together by Github

Now add co-authors to your commits

Commit Together by Github Landing page
Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
Monitask
Employee Monitoring Software with Screenshots, Internet, Activity and Time Tracking sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, ShareDrop seems to be a lot more popular than Commit Together by Github. While we know about 26 links to ShareDrop, we've tracked only 1 mention of Commit Together by Github.

social mentions
26 vs 1
File Sharing popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
202 vs 87

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

ShareDrop
Commit Together by Github
Website sharedrop.io github.blog
Pricing
Open source
—
Company Startup from the United States —
Listed in
File Sharing Cloud Storage File Sharing And Backup Secure File Sharing +1
Developer Tools Productivity Coding Crypto +1

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

ShareDrop 5 features
Commit Together by Github 4 features
  • Ease of Use
    ShareDrop offers a straightforward and intuitive interface, making it easy for users to transfer files without needing to install special software or understand complex protocols.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    The service works across different operating systems, including Windows, macOS, and Linux, facilitating seamless file sharing regardless of the device being used.
  • No Account Required
    Users can share files without the need to create an account, enhancing privacy and reducing the barrier to entry.
  • Encryption
    ShareDrop uses end-to-end encryption to ensure that the files being shared are secure and can only be accessed by the intended recipient.
  • Peer-to-Peer Transfer
    Files are transmitted directly between devices (peer-to-peer), which can result in faster transfer speeds compared to cloud-based solutions.

Possible disadvantages

  • Internet Connection Required
    Despite being a peer-to-peer service, an internet connection is still necessary to initiate the connection between devices.
  • Mobile Use Limitations
    While ShareDrop can be used on mobile browsers, the experience may not be as seamless or optimized as on desktop browsers, potentially leading to usability issues.
  • Size Limitations
    There may be limitations on the size of files that can be transferred, depending on browser capabilities and internet connection speed.
  • One-Time Use
    ShareDrop is designed for one-time file transfers and does not offer functionality for long-term storage or file history tracking.
  • Browser Dependence
    The service relies on browser capabilities and may not work optimally on older or less common browsers, limiting its accessibility.
  • Enhanced Collaboration
    Commit Together allows multiple authors to be credited in a single commit, which fosters a more collaborative environment and ensures everyone involved receives recognition for their contributions.
  • Improved Code Review Process
    With multiple authors clearly listed, reviewers can better understand who contributed to which parts of the code, facilitating more directed questions and discussions.
  • Accountability
    By attributing every change to the respective author, teams can easily track who made specific changes, which helps in accountability and understanding the history of a project.
  • Efficiency in Pair Programming
    When pair programming, both developers can be credited for their combined effort, streamlining the process of sharing code ownership during collaborative sessions.

Possible disadvantages

  • Complex Commit History
    Having multiple authors for a single commit may lead to a more complex commit history, making it harder to pinpoint individual contributions over time.
  • Potential Workflow Conflicts
    Teams that are used to single-author commits may experience workflow conflicts or require adjustments in practices to accommodate multi-author contributions.
  • Initial Setup Overhead
    Learners and new users might face a learning curve or require additional setup to understand and correctly implement the multi-author commit feature.
  • Tooling Compatibility
    Some third-party tools and extensions might not fully support or display multi-author commits, leading to inconsistencies in those environments.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

ShareDrop
Commit Together by Github

Overall verdict

  • ShareDrop is a good option for users looking for a simple, secure, and fast way to transfer files between devices over the same network. Its ease of use and lack of requirement for an account or software installation make it a convenient choice for many situations.

Why this product is good

  • ShareDrop is an open-source, browser-based application that facilitates the easy transfer of files between devices without the need for third-party software installation. It uses a peer-to-peer connection powered by WebRTC, ensuring that files are transferred securely and directly between devices, which can be particularly useful for users concerned about privacy.

Recommended for

    ShareDrop is recommended for individuals or teams who need to transfer files quickly and securely within a local network. It is especially useful for non-technical users who prefer a straightforward solution, and for those who prioritize privacy since it does not store files on external servers.

No analysis of Commit Together by Github yet.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

ShareDrop 1 video + Add
Commit Together by Github 0 videos + Add

SupraTouch #4: ShareDrop (análisis app/web)

No Commit Together by Github videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
ShareDrop
Commit Together by Github
100% 100%
File Sharing
0% 0%
0% 0%
Developer Tools
100% 100%
100% 100%
Cloud Storage
0% 0%
0% 0%
Productivity
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using ShareDrop and Commit Together by Github. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

ShareDrop 26 mentions
Commit Together by Github 1 mention
  • P2P local file transfer based on WebRTC
    Reminds me of https://sharedrop.io. - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago
  • Which web browser (apart from Firefox) do you use and why?
    Can you check if sharedrop.io is working on Mull? On my device, it can see the other party but it can't save file. Source: over 3 years ago
  • P2P File Transfer
    I googled about it, so im here to ask. Aren't there any APP that does P2P file sharing anymore? I found a website called sharedrop.io and it seems to work, but Im looking for alternatives. Source: over 3 years ago

View more

  • Ask HN: Do you rewrite pull requests?
    There is "Co-authored-by" which is supported on GitHub [1] and seems appropriate if the maintainer is basing the solution on someone's code. [1] https://github.blog/2018-01-29-commit-together-with-co-authors/. - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago

Alternatives to ShareDrop and Commit Together by Github

When comparing ShareDrop and Commit Together by Github, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...